Location of positive surgical margins after retropubic, perineal, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer

Urology

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 386-390

  Salomon, Laurent ^a   Anastasiadis, Aristotelis G ^b   Levrel, Olivier ^b   Katz, Ran ^b   Saint, Fabien ^b   De La Taille, Alexandre ^b   Cicco, Antony ^b   Vordos, Dimitri ^b   Hoznek, Andras ^b   Chopin, Dominique ^b   Abbou, Clement Claude ^b  

^a Herbert Irving Pavilion ^*  (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ANTIGEN DETECTION; ARTICLE; BLADDER NECK; CANCER LOCALIZATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORGAN WEIGHT; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMINAL VESICLE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0037322643     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02255-0     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Walsh P.C., Lepor H., Eggleston J.D. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function anatomical and pathological considerations . Prostate. 4:1983;473-485.
2. Young H.H. The early diagnosis and radical cure of carcinoma of the prostate being a study of 40 cases and presentation of a radical operation which was carried out in four cases . Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 16:1905;315-319.
3. Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy initial short experience . Urology. 50:1997;854-857.
4. Epstein J., Partin A.W., Sauvageot J., et al. Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy a multivariate analysis of 721 men with long-term follow-up . Am J Surg Pathol. 20:1996;286-292.
5. Wieder J.A., Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 160:1998;299-315.
6. Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy the Créteil experience . Eur Urol. 40:2001;38-45.
7. Weldon V.E., Tavel F.R. Potency-sparing radical perineal prostatectomy anatomy, surgical technique and initial results . J Urol. 140:1988;559-562.
8. Stamey T.A., McNeal J.E., Freiha F.S., et al. Morphometric and clinical studies on 68 consecutive radical prostatectomies. J Urol. 139:1988;1235-1241.
9. for the International Union Against Cancer Sobin L.H., Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 5th ed:1997;170-173 Wiley-Liss, New York.
10. Soh S., Kattan M.W., Berckman S., et al. Has there been a recent shift in the pathological features and prognosis of patients treated with radical prostatectomy? J Urol. 157:1997;2212-2218.
11. Stamey T.A., Donaldson A.N., Yemoto C.E., et al. Histological and clinical findings in 896 consecutive prostates treated only with radical retropubic prostatectomy epidemiologic significance of annual changes . J Urol. 160:1998;2412-2417.
12. Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Seay T.M., et al. Pathologic classification of prostate carcinoma the impact of margin status . Cancer. 82:1998;902-908.
13. Blute M.L., Bostwick D.G., Bergstralh E.J., et al. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology. 50:1997;733-739.
14. Villers A., McNeal J.F., Redwine E.A., et al. The role of perineural space invasion in the local spread of prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Urol. 142:1989;763-768.
15. Boccon-Gibod L., Ravery V., Vordos D., et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer perineal approach increases risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions . J Urol. 160:1998;1383-1385.
16. Weldon V.E. Letters to editor response to "Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incision" J Urol. 161:1999;1287.
17. Teichman J.M., Reddy P.K., Hulbert J.C. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Urology. 5:1995;823-830.
18. Frazier H.A., Robertson J.E., Paulson D.F. Radical prostatectomy the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach . J Urol. 147:1992;888-890.
19. Haab F., Boccon-Gibod L., Delmas V., et al. Perineal versus retropubic radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer. Br J Urol. 74:1994;626-629.
20. Kahn S.A., Tiwari A., Narayan P. Radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy a clinical comparison . J Urol. 159:(suppl):1998;61.
21. Lance R.S., Freidrichs P.A., Kane C., et al. A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group. BJU Int. 87:2001;61-65.
22. Walther P.J. Radical perineal vs. retropubic prostatectomy a review of optimal application and technical consideration in the utilization of these procedures . Eur Urol. 24:1998;34-38.
23. Guillonneau B., Vallencien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy the Montsouris technique . J Urol. 163:2000;1643-1649.
24. Rassweiler J., Sentker L., Zeeman O., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique an analysis of the first 180 cases . J Urol. 166:2001;2101-2108.
25. Türk I., Deger S., Winkelmann B., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technical aspects and experience with 125 cases . Eur Urol. 40:2001;46-53.
26. Imperato P.J., Waisman J., Jenner R.P. Radical prostatectomy specimens among Medicare patients in New York State a review of pathologists' reports . Arch Pathol Lab Med. 122:1998;966-971.
27. Hall G.S., Kramer C.E., Epstein J.I. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens a comparative analysis of sampling methods . Am J Surg Pathol. 16:1992;315-324.
28. Carter H.B., Sauvageot J., Walsh P.C., et al. Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1c adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Urol. 157:1997;2206-2209.
29. Weldon V.E., Tavel F.R., Neuwirth H., et al. Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol. 153:1995;1565-1569.
30. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Schlesselman J.J., et al. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 20:2002;1853-1858.