Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 120-121

  Porpiglia, F ^a   Morra, I ^a   Lucci Chiarissi, M ^a   Manfredi, M ^a   Mele, F ^a   Grande, S ^a   Ragni, F ^a   Poggio, M ^a   Fiori, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

CANCER PATIENT; CATHETER REMOVAL; CONTINENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HORMONAL THERAPY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE VOLUME; RADIOTHERAPY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84874534975     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F et al. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med 2011; 8:1503-12.
2. Touijer KA. The promise and challenges of randomized controlled trials for surgical interventions. Eur Urol 2012; Aug. 19 [epub ahead of print].
3. Porpiglia F, Fiori C. Reply from Authors re: Karim A. Touijer. The promise and challenges of randomized controlled trials for surgical interventions. Eur Urol 2012; Sep. 25 [epub ahead of print].