Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: A comparative study of postoperative complications

Korean Journal of Urology

Volumn 54, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 756-761

  Ryu, Jeman ^a   Kwon, Taekmin ^a   Kyung, Yoon Soo ^a   Hong, Sungwoo ^b   You, Dalsan ^a   Jeong, In Gab ^a   Kim, Choung Soo ^a  

^a University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Dankook University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Complications; Prostate; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST MEDIUM EXTRAVASATION; CYSTOGRAPHY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; URETHRAL CATHETERIZATION; URINE RETENTION;

EID: 84887517464     PISSN: 20056737     EISSN: 20056745     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.756     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10-29.
2. Mottrie A, Ficarra V. Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL evaluation. Eur Urol 2010;58:525-7.
3. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Novara G, Ficarra V. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control. Curr Opin Urol 2011;21:179-84.
4. Hu JC, Hevelone ND, Ferreira MD, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Sanda MG, et al. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. J Urol 2008;180:1969-74.
5. Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 2003;92: 205-10.
6. Farnham SB, Webster TM, Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 2006;67:360-3.
7. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002;60:864-8.
8. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280: 969-74.
9. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978;49:239-43.
10. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228-42.
11. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A, eds. AJCC cancer staging manual. 7th editions. New York: Springer; 2010:457-468.
12. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 1998;160(6 Pt 2):2418-24.
13. Van Velthoven RF, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis:the single knot method. Urology 2003;61:699-702.
14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
15. Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 2009;55:1037-63.
16. Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, et al. Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter? World J Urol 2007;25:149-60.
17. Boris RS, Kaul SA, Sarle RC, Stricker HJ. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches. Can J Urol 2007;14:3566-70.
18. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004;63:819-22.
19. Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, et al. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int 2009;104:534-9.
20. Philippou P, Waine E, Rowe E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon. J Endourol 2012;26:1002-8.
21. Kirsh EJ, Worwag EM, Sinner M, Chodak GW. Using outcome data and patient satisfaction surveys to develop policies regarding minimum length of hospitalization after radical prostatectomy. Urology 2000;56:101-6.
22. Leibman BD, Dillioglugil O, Abbas F, Tanli S, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1998;52:94-9.
23. Yamamoto S, Kunishima Y, Kanamaru S, Ito N, Kinoshita H, Kamoto T, et al. A multi-center prospective study for antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent perioperative infections in urologic surgery. Hinyokika Kiyo 2004;50:673-83.
24. Arai Y, Egawa S, Tobisu K, Sagiyama K, Sumiyoshi Y, Hashine K, et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: time trends, morbidity and mortality in Japan. BJU Int 2000;85:287-94.
25. Khemees TA, Novak R, Abaza R. Risk and prevention of acute urinary retention after robotic prostatectomy. J Urol 2013;189: 1432-6.
26. Nadu A, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Olsson LE, Saint F, de La Taille A, et al. Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001;166:1662-4.
27. Rabbani F, Yunis LH, Pinochet R, Nogueira L, Vora KC, Eastham JA, et al. Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:371-86.
28. Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, et al. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. Urology 2010;75: 1092-7.
29. Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Myers RP, Blute ML, et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int 2009;103:448-53.
30. Arai Y, Okada T, Egawa S, Matsumoto K, Tobisu K, Sagiyama K, et al. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: time trends, morbidity and mortality in Japan. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1999; 2(S3):S4.