Intra- and Peri-Operative Outcomes Comparing Radical Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective, Randomised, Single-Surgeon Study

European Urology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 98-104

  Guazzoni, Giorgio ^a   Cestari, Andrea ^a   Naspro, Richard ^a   Riva, Matteo ^a   Centemero, Antonia ^a   Zanoni, Matteo ^a   Rigatti, Lorenzo ^a   Rigatti, Patrizio ^a  

^a VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOURETHROGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RECOVERY ROOM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTATECTOMY; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744933193     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.02.051     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Walsh P.C., Lepor H., and Eggleston J.C. Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4 (1983) 473-485
2. Walsh P.C. Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer provides durable cancer control with excellent quality of life: a structured debate. J Urol 163 (2000) 1802-1807
3. Salonia A., Crescenti A., Suardi N., et al. General versus spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: results of a prospective, randomised study. Urology 64 (2004) 95-100
4. Kundu S.D., Roehl K.A., Eggener S.E., Antenor J.A.V., Han M., and Catalona W.J. Potency, continence and complications in 3477 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 172 (2004) 2227-2231
5. Davis J.W., Kuban D.A., Lynch D.F., and Schellhammer P.F. Quality of life after treatment for localized prostate cancer: differences based on treatment modality. J Urol 166 (2001) 947-952
6. Schuessler W.W., Schulam P.G., Clayman R.V., and Kavoussi L.R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 50 (1997) 854-857
7. Guillonneau B., Cathelineau X., Barret E., Rozet F., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations. Eur Urol 36 (1999) 14-20
8. Omar A.M., and Townell N. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy a review of the literature and comparison with open techniques. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 7 (2004) 295-301
9. Hoznek A., Menard Y., Salomon L., and Abbou C.C. Current opinion may 2005 Update on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy. Curr Opin Urol 15 (2005) 173-180
10. Guillonneau B., Rozet F., Cathelineau X., et al. Perioperative complications of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris 3-year experience. J Urol 167 (2002) 51-56
11. Da Pozzo L.F., Colombo R., Montorsi F., Guazzoni G., and Rigatti P. An original balloon-expanding urethral suture guide for radical prostatectomy. Urology 46 (1995) 562-564
12. Heidenreich A., and Ohlmann Ch. The role of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol Update Series 3 (2005) 98-106
13. Guazzoni G., Montorsi F., Bergamaschi F., et al. Open surgical revision of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for staging of prostate cancer: the impact of laparoscopic learning curve. J Urol 151 (1994) 930-933
14. Cestari A., Guazzoni G., Bellinzoni P., Nava L., and Rigatti P. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical notes. J Endourol 14 (2000) A116 (abstract V5-6)
15. Aus G., Abbou C.C., Bolla M., et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 546-551
16. Montorsi F., Salonia A., Suardi N., et al. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 938-945
17. Slabaugh Jr. T.K., and Marshall F.F. A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 2545-2548
18. Scardino P.T. Continuing refinements in radical prostatectomy: more evidence that technique matters. J Urol 173 (2005) 338-339
19. Artibani W., Grosso G., Novara G., et al. Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 401-406
20. Rassweiler J., Seemann O., Schulze M., Teber D., Hatzinger M., and Frede T. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. J Urol 169 (2003) 1689-1693
21. El-Feel A., Davis J.W., Deger S., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 62 (2003) 314-318
22. Anastasiadis A.G., Salomon L., Katz R., Hoznek A., Chopin D., and Abbou C.C. Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of functional outcome. Urology 62 (2003) 292-297
23. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163 (2000) 418-422
24. Remzi M., Kilnger H.C., Tinzl M.V., et al. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 83-89
25. Bhayani S.B., Pavlovich C.P., Hsu T.S., Sullivan W., and Su L.M. Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61 (2003) 612-616
26. Atallah F., Khedis M., Seguin P., Fourcade O., and Samii K. Postoperative analgesia and recovery after open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 99 (2004) 1878-1879
27. Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M., and Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92 (2003) 205-210
28. Nadu A., Salomon L., Hoznek A., et al. Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 166 (2001) 1662-1664
29. Lepor H., Nieder A.M., and Fraiman M.C. Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 58 (2001) 425-429
30. Guillonneau B., Gupta R., El Fettouh H., Cathelineau X., Baumert H., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 169 (2003) 1694-1696
31. Wieder J.A., and Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160 (1998) 299-315
32. Eastham J.A., Kattan M.W., Riedel E., et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 170 (2003) 2292-2295
33. Dillenburg W., Poulakis V., Witzsch U., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the value of intraoperative frozen sections. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 614-621
34. Rassweiler J., Stolzenburg J., Sulser T., et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy-the experience of the German Laparoscopic Working Group. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 113-119
35. Fabrizio M.D., Tuerk I., and Schellhammer P.F. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: decreasing the learning curve using a mentor initiated approach. J Urol 169 (2003) 2063-2065