Approaches to Studying Among Deaf Students in Higher Education

Deaf Cognition: Foundations and Outcomes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Richardson, John T E ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

College students; Deaf students; Learning; Studying

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921258262     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195368673.003.0014     Document Type: Chapter

References (56)

1. Barnes, L. (2006). Formal qualifications for language tutors in higher education: A case for discussion. Deafness and Education International, 8, 106-124.
2. Braxton, J. M. & Hargens, L. L. (1996). Variations among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1-46). New York: Agathon Press.
3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cokely, D. (2005). Shifting positionality: A critical examination of the turning point in the relationship of interpreters and the Deaf Community. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 3-28). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge, U.K.:Cambridge University Press.
6. Dean, R. K., & Pollard, R. Q., Jr. (2005). Consumers and service effectiveness in interpreting work: A practice profession perspective. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 259-282). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23, 231-254.
8. Estes, D. M. (1999, August). Issues in problem-based learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration, Jackson Hole, WY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450469.)
9. Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255-275.
10. Kurz, K. B., & Langer, E. C. (2004). Student perspectives on educational interpreting:Twenty deaf and hard of hearing students offer insights and suggestions. In E. A. Winston (Ed.), Educational interpreting: How it can succeed (pp. 9-47). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
11. Laurillard, D. (1979). The processes of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395-409.
12. Lawless, C. J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257-282.
13. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 285-298.
14. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C., & Seewagen, R. (2005). Educational interpreting: Access and outcomes. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 57-83). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., & Seewagen, R. (2005). Preface. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education:Directions for research and practice (pp. v-x). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Martin, E., & Ramsden, P. (1987). Learning skills, or skill in learning? In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 155-167). Milton Keynes, U.K.: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
17. Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications of an alternative view of learning. In N. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education (pp. 32-42). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
18. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300.
19. Metzger, M. (1999). Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
20. Morgan, A., Gibbs, G., & Taylor, E. (1981). What do Open University students initially understand about learning? (Study Methods Group Report No. 8). Milton Keynes: The Open University, Institute of Educational Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 203 748.)
21. Napier, J. (2002). University interpreting: Linguistic issues for consideration. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7, 281-301.
22. Newman, M. (2004). Problem-based learning: An exploration of the method and evaluation of its effectiveness in a continuing nursing education programme. London:Middlesex University.
23. Norton, L., Richardson, J. T. E., Hartley, J., Newstead, S., & Mayes, J. (2005). Teachers' beliefs and intentions concerning teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 50, 537-571.
24. Pollitt, K. (2000). On babies, bathwater and approaches to interpreting. Deaf Worlds, 16, 60-64.
25. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1993). Development of an Approaches to Teaching questionnaire. Research and Development in Higher Education, 15, 468-473.
26. Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1997). Relations between perceptions of the teaching environment and approaches to teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 25-35.
27. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129-150.
28. Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368-383.
29. Ramsey, C. L. (1997). Deaf children in public schools: Placement, context, and consequences. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
30. Richardson, J. T. E. (1996). Measures of effect size. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 12-22.
31. Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham, U.K.: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
32. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005a). Students' approaches to learning and teachers' approaches to teaching in higher education. Educational Psychology, 25, 673-680.
33. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005b). Students' perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying in distance education. British Educational Research Journal, 31, 7-27.
34. Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Perceptions of academic quality and approaches to studying among technology students in distance education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31, 421-433.
35. Richardson, J. T. E. (2007). Mental models of learning in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 253-270.
36. Richardson, J. T. E., Barnes, L., & Fleming, J. (2004). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Deafness and Education International, 6, 100-122.
37. Richardson, J. T. E., MacLeod-Gallinger, J., McKee, B. G., & Long, G. L. (2000). Approaches to studying in deaf and hearing students in higher education. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5, 156-173.
38. Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45-56.
39. Roy, C. B. (1993). The problem with definitions, descriptions, and the role metaphors of interpreters. Journal of Interpretation, 6, 127-154.
40. Roy, C. B. (2000). Interpreting as a discourse process. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253-274.
42. Salevsky, H. (1993). The distinctive nature of interpreting studies. Target, 5, 149-167.
43. Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner's perspective: I. Some common-sense assumptions (Report No. 76). Göteborg, Sweden: University of Göteborg, Institute of Education.
44. Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453-472.
45. Seal, B. C. (2004). Best practices in educational interpreting (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46. Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Bentley, R. J., & Martens, G. G. (1990). Disciplinary differences in course planning. Review of Higher Education, 13, 141-165.
47. Stark, J. S., Lowther, M. A., Ryan, M. P., & Genthon, M. (1988). Faculty reflect on course planning. Research in Higher Education, 29, 219-240.
48. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1993). Approaches adopted by teachers of first year university science courses. Research and Development in Higher Education, 14, 223-228.
49. Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1996). Changing approaches to teaching: A relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 21, 275-284.
50. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37, 57-70.
51. Turner, G. H., & Harrington, F. J. (2001). The campaign for real interpreting. In F. J. Harrington & G. H. Turner (Eds.), Interpreting interpreting (pp. vi-xiv). Coleford, U.K.:Douglas McLean.
52. Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-83.
53. Van Rossum, E. J., & Taylor, I. P. (1987, April). The relationship between conceptions of learning and good teaching: A scheme of cognitive development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
54. Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37, 1-21.
55. Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 33-53.
56. Winston, E. A. (2005). Designing a curriculum for American Sign Language/English interpreting educators. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Sign language interpreting and interpreter education: Directions for research and practice (pp. 208-234). New York: Oxford University Press.