Limiting flux and critical transmembrane pressure determination using an exponential model: The effect of concentration factor, temperature, and cross-flow velocity during casein micelle concentration by microfiltration

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 414-425

  Astudillo Castro, Carolina L ^a  

^a PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALPARAÍSO   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROFILTRATION;

CONCENTRATION FACTORS; CROSSFLOW VELOCITIES; DIRECT DETERMINATION; EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE; EXPONENTIAL MODELS; PROCESS PARAMETERS; RESISTANCE MODELING; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

FLOW VELOCITY;

EID: 84921033910     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie5033292     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Daufin, G.; Merin, U. Cleaning of Inorganic Membranes after Whey and Milk Ultrafiltration. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991, 38, 82.
2. Ishigami, T.; Fuse, H.; Asao, S.; Saeki, D.; Ohmukai, Y.; Kamio, E.; Matsuyama, H. Permeation of Dispersed Particles through a Pore and Transmembrane Pressure Behavior in Dead-End Constant-Flux Microfiltration by Two-Dimensional Direct Numerical Simulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 4650.
3. Brans, G.; Schroën, C. G. P. H.; van der Sman, R. G. M.; Boom, R. M. Membrane Fractionation of Milk: State of the Art and Challenges. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243, 263.
4. Goudédranche, H.; Fauquant, J.; Maubois, J. Fractionation of Globular Milk Fat by Membrane Microfiltration. Lait 2000, 80, 93.
5. Henning, D. R.; Baer, R. J.; Hassan, A. N.; Dave, R. Major Advances in Concentrated and Dry Milk Products, Cheese, and Milk Fat-Based Spreads. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 1179.
6. Skrzypek, M.; Burger, M. Isoflux Ceramic Membranes-Practical Experiences in Dairy Industry. Desalination 2010, 250, 1095.
7. Beolchini, F.; Vegho, F.; Barba, D. Microfiltration of Bovine and Ovine Milk for the Reduction of Microbial Content in a Tubular Membrane: A Preliminary Investigation. Desalination 2004, 161, 251.
8. Guerra, A.; Jonsson, G.; Rasmussen, A.; Nielsena, E. W.; Edelsten, D. Low Cross-Flow Velocity Microfiltration of Skim Milk for Removal of Bacterial Spores. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7, 849.
9. Hoffmann, W.; Kiesner, C.; Clawin-Rädecker, I.; Martin, D.; Eihoff, K.; Lorenzen, P.; Meisel, H.; Hammer, P.; Suhren, G.; P, T. Processing of Extended Shelf Life Milk Using Microfiltration. Int. J. Dairy Technol. 2006, 59, 229.
10. Lawrence, N. D.; Kentish, S. E.; O'Connor, a. J.; Barber, a. R.; Stevens, G. W. Microfiltration of Skim Milk Using Polymeric Membranes for Casein Concentrate Manufacture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 60, 237.
11. Pafylias, I.; Cheryan, M.; Mehaia, M.; Saglam, N. Microfiltration of Milk with Ceramic Membranes. Food Res. Int. 1996, 29, 141.
12. Tan, T. J.; Wang, D.; Moraru, C. I. A Physicochemical Investigation of Membrane Fouling in Cold Microfiltration of Skim Milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 4759.
13. Barukčić, I.; Božanić, R.; Kulozik, U. Effect of Pore Size and Process Temperature on Flux, Microbial Reduction and Fouling Mechanisms during Sweet Whey Cross-Flow Microfiltration by Ceramic Membranes. Int. Dairy J. 2014, 39, 8.
14. Cheryan, M. Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1998; pp 1-615.
15. Brans, G.; van der Sman, R. G. M.; Schroën, C. G. P. H.; van der Padt, A.; Boom, R. M. Optimization of the Membrane and Pore Design for Micro-Machined Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278, 239.
16. Field, R. W.; Wu, D.; Howell, J. a.; Gupta, B. B. Critical Flux Concept for Microfiltration Fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 100, 259.
17. Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Field, R. Critical and Sustainable Fluxes: Theory, Experiments, and Applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 281, 42.
18. Baruah, G. L.; Belfort, G. A Predictive Aggregate Transport Model for Microfiltration of Combined Macromolecular Solutions and Poly-Disperse Suspensions: Model Development. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 1524.
19. Belfort, G.; Davis, R.; Zydney, A. The Behavior of Suspensions and Macromolecular Solutions in Crossflow Microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1994, 96, 1.
20. Samuelsson, G.; Huisman, I.; Träga˚rdh, G.; Paulsson, M. Predicting Limiting Flux of Skim Milk in Crossflow Microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 129, 277.
21. Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P. Critical Fouling Conditions Induced by Colloidal Surface Interaction: From Causes to Consequences. Desalination 2005, 175, 21.
22. Grandison, A.; Youravong, W.; Lewis, M. Hydrodynamic Factors Affecting Flux and Fouling during Ultrafiltration of Skimmed Milk. Lait 2000, 80, 165.
23. Espinasse, B.; Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P. On an Experimental Method to Measure Critical Flux in Ultrafiltration. Desalination 2002, 146, 91.
24. Pollice, A.; Brookes, A.; Jefferson, B.; Judd, S. Subcritical Flux Fouling in Membrane Bioreactors - A Review of Recent Literature. Desalination 2005, 174, 221.
25. Youravong, W.; Grandison, A. S.; Lewis, M. J. The Effects of Physicochemical Changes on Critical Flux of Skimmed Milk Ultrafiltration. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2002, 24, 929.
26. Guo, W.; Vigneswaran, S.; Ngo, H. H.; Ben Aim, R. Evaluating the Efficiency of Pretreatment to Microfiltration: Using Critical Flux as a Performance Indicator. In 5th International Membrane Science and Technology Conference, Sydney, Australia; 2003.
27. Bessiere, Y.; Abidine, N.; Bacchin, P. Low Fouling Conditions in Dead-End Filtration: Evidence for a Critical Filtered Volume and Interpretation Using Critical Osmotic Pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264, 37.
28. Stoller, M.; Chianese, A. Influence of the Adopted Pretreatment Process on the Critical Flux Value of Batch Membrane Processes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 2249.
29. Espinasse, B.; Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P. Filtration Method Characterizing the Reversibility of Colloidal Fouling Layers at a Membrane Surface: Analysis through Critical Flux and Osmotic Pressure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 320, 483.
30. Howell, J. Subcritical Flux Operation of Microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 107, 165.
31. Guglielmi, G.; Saroj, D. P.; Chiarani, D.; Andreottola, G. Subcritical Fouling in Membrane Bioreactor for Municipal Waterwaste Treatment: Experimental Investigation and Mathematical Modeling. Water Res. 2007, 41, 3093.
32. Schutyser, M.; Belfort, G. Dean Vortex Membrane Microfiltration Non-Newtonian Viscosity Effects. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 25, 494.
33. Ho, C.; Zydney, A. L. Protein Fouling of Asymmetric and Composite Microfiltration Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1412.
34. Bouzid, H.; Rabiller-Baudry, M.; Paugam, L.; Rousseau, F.; Derriche, Z.; Bettahar, N. E. Impact of Zeta Potential and Size of Caseins as Precursors of Fouling Deposit on Limiting and Critical Fluxes in Spiral Ultrafiltration of Modified Skim Milks. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 314, 67.
35. Gésan, G.; Daufin, G.; Merin, U.; Labbé, J.; Quemerais, A. Fouling during Constant Flux Crossflow Microfiltration of Pretreated Whey. Influence of Transmembrane Pressure Gradient. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 80, 131.
36. Youravong, W.; Lewis, M.; Grandison, A. Critical Flux in Ultrafiltration of Skimmed Milk. Food Bioprod. Process. 2003, 81, 3.
37. Astudillo, C.; Parra, J.; González, S.; Cancino, B. A New Parameter for Membrane Cleaning Evaluation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2010, 73, 286.
38. Ryan, T. P. Modern Experimental Design; John Wiley & Sons, I., Ed.; Wiley: NJ, 2007; p 601 pp.
39. Montgomery, D. Analysis and Experimental Design, 5th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2001; p 699.
40. Willmott, C. J.; Matsuura, K. Advantages of the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) over the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in Assessing Average Model Performance. Clim. Res. 2005, 30, 79.
41. Yeh, H. M. Exponential Model Analysis of Permeate Flux for Ultrafiltration in Hollow-Fiber Modules by Momentum Balance. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 147, 202.
42. Mallubhotla, H.; Belfort, G. Semiempirical Modeling of Cross- Flow Microfiltration with Periodic Reverse Filtration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 2920.
43. Bacchin, P. A Possible Link between Critical and Limiting Flux for Colloidal Systems: Consideration of Critical Deposit Formation along a Membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228, 237.
44. Hurt, E.; Zulewska, J.; Newbold, M.; Barbano, D. M. Micellar Casein Concentrate Production with a 3x, 3-Stage, Uniform Transmembrane Pressure Ceramic Membrane Process at 50 °C. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 5588.
45. Lawrence, N.; Kentish, S.; O'Connor, A.; Stevens, G.; Barber, A. Microfiltration of Skim Milk for Casein Concentrate Manufacture. Desalination 2006, 200, 305.
46. Samuelsson, G.; Dejmek, P.; Träga˚rdh, G.; Paulsson, M. Minimizing Whey Protein Retention in Cross-Flow Microfiltration of Skim Milk. Int. Dairy J. 1997, 7, 237.
47. Nordin, A.-K.; Jönsson, A.-S. Flux Decline along the Flow Channel in Tubular Ultrafiltration Modules. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2009, 87, 1551.
48. Le Berre, O.; Daufin, G. Skimmilk Crossflow Microfiltration Performance versus Permeation Flux to Wall Shear Stress Ratio. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 117, 261.
49. Jönsson, A.-S.; Jönsson, B. Ultrafiltration of Colloidal Dispersions - A Theoretical Model of the Concentration Polarization Phenomena. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 180, 504.
50. Wu, D.; Howell, J.; Field, R. Critical Flux Measurement for Model Colloids. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 152, 89.
51. Carić, M.; Milanović, S.; Krstić, D.; Tekić, M. Fouling of Inorganic Membranes by Adsorption of Whey Proteins. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 165, 83.
52. Vincent-Vela, M.-C.; Cuartas-Uribe, B.; Álvarez-Blanco, S.; Lora-García, J. Analysis of an Ultrafiltration Model: Influence of Operational Conditions. Desalination 2012, 284, 14.
53. Zhang, W.; Zhu, Z.; Jaffrin, M.; Ding, L. Hydraulic Conditions on Effluent Quality, Flux Behavior, and Energy Consumption in a Shear-Enhanced Membrane Filtration Using Box - Behnken Response Surface. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 7176.
54. Alexiadis, A.; Bao, J.; Fletcher, D. F.; Wiley, D. E.; Clements, D. J. Analysis of the Dynamic Response of a Reverse Osmosis Membrane to Time-Dependent Transmembrane Pressure Variation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 7823.
55. Krstić, D. M.; Koris, A. K.; Tekić, M. N. Do Static Turbulence Promoters Have Potential in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration Applications? Desalination 2006, 191, 371.
56. Gebreyohannes, A. Y.; Mazzei, R.; Curcio, E.; Poerio, T.; Drioli, E.; Giorno, L. Study on the In Situ Enzymatic Self-Cleansing of Microfiltration Membrane for Valorization of Olive Mill Wastewater. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 10396.
57. Bacchin, P.; Aimar, P.; Sanchez, V. Model for Colloidal Fouling of Membranes. AIChE J. 1995, 41, 368.
58. Lipnizki, J.; Casani, S.; Jonsson, G. Optimization of Ultrafiltration of a Highly Viscous Protein Solution Using Spiral-Wound Modules. Desalination 2005, 180, 15.
59. Chang, D.-J.; Hsu, F.-C.; Hwang, S.-J. Steady-State Permeate Flux of Cross-Flow Microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 98, 97.
60. Huisman, I.; Träga˚rdh, G.; Träga˚rdh, C. Particle Transport in Crossflow Microfiltration II. Effects of Particle - Particle Interactions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 281.
61. Huisman, I.; Träga˚rdh, C. Particle Transport in Crossflow Microfiltration I. Effects of Hydrodynamics and Diffusion. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54, 271.
62. Hwang, K.-J.; Chou, F.-Y.; Tung, K.-L. Effects of Operating Conditions on the Performance of Cross-Flow Microfiltration of Fine Particle/Protein Binary Suspension. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 274, 183.
63. Sethi, S.; Wiesner, M. Modeling of Transient Permeate Flux in Cross-Flow Membrane Filtration Incorporating Multiple Particle Transport Mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 136, 191.
64. Vera, L.; Delgado, S.; Elmaleh, S. Dimensionless Numbers for the Steady-State Flux of Cross-Flow Microfifiltration and Ultrafiltration with Gas Sparging. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 3419.
65. Field, R. W.; Pearce, G. K. Critical, Sustainable and Threshold Fluxes for Membrane Filtration with Water Industry Applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 164, 38.
66. Wemsy Diagne, N.; Rabiller-Baudry, M.; Paugam, L. On the Actual Cleanability of Polyethersulfone Membrane Fouled by Proteins at Critical or Limiting Flux. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 425-426, 40.
67. Baruah, G. L.; Couto, D.; Belfort, G. A Predictive Aggregate Transport Model for Microfiltration of Combined Macromolecular Solutions and Poly-Disperse Suspensions: Testing Model with Transgenic Goat Milk. Biotechnol. Prog. 2003, 19, 1533.
68. Gésan-Guiziou, G.; Boyaval, E.; Daufin, G. Critical Stability Conditions in Crossflow Microfiltration of Skimmed Milk: Transition to Irreversible Deposition. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 158, 211.
69. Gésan-Guiziou, G.; Daufin, G.; Boyaval, E. Critical Stability Conditions in Skimmed Milk Crossflow Microfiltration: Impact on Operating Modes. Lait 2000, 80, 129.
70. Piry, A.; Kuhnl, W.; Grein, T.; Tolkach, A.; Ripperger, S.; Kulozik, U. Length Dependency of Flux and Protein Permeation in Crossflow Microfiltration of Skimmed Milk. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325, 887.
71. Bacchin, P.; Espinasse, B.; Aimar, P. Distributions of Critical Flux: Modelling, Experimental Analysis, and Consequences for Cross- Flow Membrane Filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 250, 223.