More robust animals: A major challenge for sustainable development of livestock production implying the blossoming of fine and highthroughput phenotyping;Des animaux plus robustes: Un enjeu majeur pour le développement durable des productions animales nécessitant l'essor du phénotypage fin et à haut débit

Productions Animales

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 181-194

  Phocas, F ^a   Bobe, J ^b   Bodin, L ^a,c   Charley, B ^d   Dourmad, J Y ^a   Friggens, N C ^a   Hocquette, J F ^a,e   Le Bail, P Y ^b   Le Bihan Duval, E ^f   Mormede P ^a,c   Quere P ^a   Schelcher, F ^g,h  

^a Universite de Nantes   (France)

^b Campus de Beaulieu   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^d INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^e UMR1213 HERBIVORES   (France)

^f STATION DE RECHERCHES AVICOLES   (France)

^g IHAP   (France)

^h UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84920833264     PISSN: 09900632     EISSN: 11525428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Amer P.R., 2012. Turning science on robust cattle into improved genetic selection decisions. Animal, 6, 551-556.
2. Bateson P., Gluckman P., 2011. Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. p156.
3. Beilharz R.G., 1998. Environmental limit to genetic change. An alternative theorem of natural selection. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 115, 433-437.
4. Berckmans D., 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/seminars/docs/290212_d2s4b_2_daniel_berckmans.pdf.
5. Blanc F., Ollion E., Puillet L., Delaby L., Ingrand S., Tichit M., Friggens N.C., 2013. Evaluation quantitative de la robustesse des animaux et du troupeau: quels principes retenir? Renc. Rech. Rum., 265-272.
6. Bobe J., Labbé C., 2010. Egg and sperm quality in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 165, 535-548. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19272390.
7. th Ann. Meet. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Warsaw, Pologne, 24-27.
8. Bodin L., Bolet G., Garcia M., Garreau H., Larzul C., David I., 2010. Robustesse et canalisation: vision de généticiens. In: Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience. les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d'élevage. Sauvant D., Perez J.M. (Eds). Dossier, Inra Prod. Anim., 23, 11-21.
9. Boer H.M.T., Apri M., Molenaar J., Stötzel C., Veerkamp R.F., Woelders H., 2012. Candidate mechanisms underlying atypical progesterone profiles as deduced from parameter perturbations in a mathematical model of the bovine estrous cycle. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 3837-3851.
10. Bonnet E., Fostier A., Bobe J., 2007. Characterization of rainbow trout egg quality: a case study using four different breeding protocols, with emphasis on the incidence of embryonic malformations. Theriogenology, 67, 786-794. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17118435.
11. Bordas A., Tixier-Boichard M., Merat P., 1992. Direct and correlated responses to divergent selection for residual food intake in Rhode island red laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 33, 741-754.
12. Brière S., Brillard J.P., Panheleux M., Froment P., 2011. Alimentation, fertilité et bien-être des oiseaux reproducteurs domestiques: des liens complexes. In: Bien-être du poulet de chair. Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 24, 171-180.
13. Bronson F.H., 1989. Mammalian reproductive biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. p325.
14. Brooks S., Tyler C.R., Sumpter J.P., 1997. Egg quality in fish: what makes a good egg? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 7, 387-416. Available at: ISI:A1997YK79300001.
15. Calenge F, Martin C, Le Floch N., Phocas F., Morgavi D., Rogel-Gaillard C., Quéré P. 2014. Intégrer la caractérisation du microbiote digestif dans le phénotypage de l'animal de rente: vers un nouvel outil de maîtrise de la santé en élevage? In: Phénotypage des animaux d'élevage. Phocas F. (Ed) Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 27, 209-222.
16. Canario L., Mignon-Grasteau S., Dupont-Nivet M., Phocas F., 2013. Genetics of behavioural adaptation of livestock to farming conditions. Animal, 7, 357-377.
17. Celi P., 2011. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in ruminant medicine. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol., 33, 233-40.
18. Chaussabel D., Pascual, V. Banchereau J., 2010. Assessing the human immune system through blood transcriptomics. Bmc Biology 8, 8, 84: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/84.
19. Codrea M.C., Højsgaard S., Friggens N.C., 2011. Differential smoothing of time-series measurements to identify disturbances in performance and quantify animal response characteristics: an example using milk yield profiles in dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci., 89, 3089-3098.
20. Cole S.W., 2010. Elevating the perspective on human stress genomics. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35, 955-962.
21. Contreras V., Urien C., Guiton R., Alexandre Y., Manh T.P.V., Andrieu T., Crozat K., Jouneau L., Bertho N., Epardaud M., Hope J., Savina A., Amigorena S., Bonneau M., Dalod M., Schwartz-Cornil I., 2010. Existence of CD8 alpha-like dendritic cells with a conserved functional specialization and a common molecular signature in distant mammalian species. J. Immunol., 185, 3313-3325.
22. Crozat K., Guiton R., Contreras V., Feuillet V., Dutertre CA, Ventre E., Manh T.P.V., Baranek T., Storset AK, Marvel J., Boudinot P., Hosmalin A., Schwartz-Cornil I., Dalod M., 2010. The XC chemokine receptor 1 is a conserved selective marker of mammalian cells homologous to mouse CD8 alpha(+) dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med., 207, 1283-1292.
23. Dantzer R., Mormède P., 1983. Stress in farm animals: a need for reevaluation. J. Anim. Sci., 57, 6-18.
24. David I., Bodin L., Gianola D., Legarra A., Manfredi E., Robert-Granie C., 2009. Product versus additive threshold models for analysis of reproduction outcomes in animal genetics. J. Anim. Sci., 87, 2510-2518.
25. David I., Carabano M. J., Tusell L., Diaz C., Gonzalez-Recio O., de Maturana E.L., Piles M., Ugarte E., Bodin L., 2011. Product versus additive model for studying artificial insemination results in several livestock populations. J. Anim. Sci., 89, 321-328.
26. de Verdal H., Mignon-Grasteau S., Jeulin C., Le Bihan-Duval E., Leconte M., Mallet S., Martin C., Narcy A., 2010. Digestive tract measurements and histological adaptation in broiler lines divergently selected for digestive efficiency. Poult. Sci., 89, 1955-1961.
27. Dourmad J.Y., Canario L., Gilbert H., Merlot E., Quesnel H., Prunier A., 2010. Évolution des performances et de la robustesse des animaux en élevage porcin. In: Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience,. les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d'élevage. Sauvant D., Perez J.M. (Eds). INRA Prod. Anim., 23, 53-64.
28. Evans R.D., Wallace M., Garrick D.J., Dillon P., Berry D.P., Olori V., 2006. Effects of calving age, breed fraction and month of calving on calving interval and survival across parities in Irish spring-calving dairy cows. Livest. Sci., 100, 216-230.
29. Fossum C., Wattrang E., Fuxler L., Jensen K.T., Wallgren P., 1998. Evaluation of various cytokines (IL-6, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-α) as markers for acute bacterial infection in swine -a possible role for serum interleukin-6. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 64, 161-172.
30. Foury A., Tribout T., Bazin C., Billon Y., Bouffaud M., Gogué J.M., Bidanel J.P., Mormède P., 2009. Estimation of genetic trends from 1977 to 2000 for stress-responsive systems in French Large White and Landrace pig populations using frozen semen. Animal, 3, 1681-1687.
31. Friggens N.C., 2003. Body lipid reserves and the reproductive cycle: towards a better understanding. Livest. Prod. Sci., 83, 219-226.
32. Friggens N.C., van der Waaij E.H., 2009. Modelling of resource allocation patterns. In Resource Allocation Theory Applied to Farm Animal Production. Rauw W.A. (Ed). 302-320. CABI, Wallingford, U.K.
33. Friggens N.C., Disenhaus C., Petit H.V., 2010a. Nutritional sub-fertility in the dairy cow: towards improved reproductive management through a better biological understanding. Animal, 4, 1197-1213.
34. Friggens N.C., Sauvant D., Martin O., 2010b. Vers des définitions opérationnelles de la robustesse s'appuyant sur des faits biologiques: l'exemple de la nutrition. In: Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience... les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d'élevage. Sauvant D., Perez J.M. (Eds). Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 23, 43-52.
35. Gilbert H., Bidanel J.P., Gruand J., Caritez J.C., Billon Y., Guillouet P., Lagant H., Noblet J., Sellier P., 2007. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits. J. Anim. Sci., 85, 3182-3188.
36. Goff J.P., 2006. Major advances in our understanding of nutritional influences on bovine health. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 1292-301.
37. Grégoire J., Bergeron R., D'Allaire S., Meunier-Salaün M.C., Devillers N., 2013. Assessment of lameness in sows using gait, footprints, postural behaviour and foot lesion analysis. Animal, 7, 1163-1173.
38. Grimard B., Fréret S., Chevallie, A., Ponsart C., Humblot P., 2006. Genetic and environmental factors influencing first service conception rate and late embryonic/foetal mortality in low fertility dairy herds. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 91, 31-44.
39. Hansen J., Sato M., Ruedy R., 2011. Public perception of climate change and the new climate dice. ArXiv, http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1204/1204.1286.pdf.
40. Hocquette J.F., Capel C., David V., Guéméné D., Bidanel J., Ponsart C., Gastinel P.L., Le Bail P.Y., Monget P., Mormède P., Barbezant M., Guillou F, Peyraud J.L., 2012. Objectives and applications of phenotyping network set-up for livestock. Animal, 83, 517-528.
41. Højsgaard S., Friggens N.C., 2010. Quantifying degree of mastitis from common trends in a panel of indicators for mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 582-592.
42. Kay V.J., Robertson L., 1998. Hyperactivated motility of human spermatozoa: a review of physiological function and application in assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod., 4, 776-786.
43. Kirkwood T.B.L., Kapahi P., Shanley D.P., 2000. Evolution, stress and longevity. J. Anat., 197, 587-590.
44. Kitano H., 2004. Biological robustness. Nature Rev. Genet., 5, 826-837.
45. Knap P.W., 2005. Breeding robust pigs. Austral. J. Exp. Agric., 45, 763-773.
46. Kolmodin R., Strandberg E., Madsen P., Jensen J., Jorjani H., 2002. Genotype by environment interaction in nordic dairy cattle studied using reaction norms. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section A -Anim. Sci., 52, 11-24.
47. Koolhaas, J.M., de Boer, S.F., Coppens, C.M., Buwalda B., 2010. Neuroendocrinology of coping styles: Towards understanding the biology of individual variation. Front. Neuroendocrinol., 31, 307-321.
48. Koolhaas J.M., Bartolomucci A., Buwalda B., de Boer S.F., Flugge G., Korte S.M., Meerlo P., Murison R., Olivier B., Palanza P., Richter-Levin G., Sgoifo A., Steimer T., Stiedl O., van Dijk G., Wöhr M., Fuchs E., 2011. Stress revisited: A critical evaluation of the stress concept. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 35, 1291-1301.
49. Labas V., Bourin M.C., Cahier K., Grasseau I., Teixeira A.P., Terlot J.D., Gérard N., Blesbois E., 2012. Analyse protéomique du sperme de coq: profil MALDI-TOF du plasma séminal et des spermatozoïdes congelés/décongelés afin de caractériser des biomarqueurs de la qualité de la semence et les interactions entre cellules et fluides. SFEAP, Rouen, France, p98.
50. Lamy E., Mau M., 2012. Saliva proteomics as an emerging, non-invasive tool to study livestock physiology, nutrition and diseases. J. Proteomics, 75, 4251-4258.
51. Larzul C., Terenina E., Foury A.F., Billon Y., Louveau I., Merlot E., Mormède P., 2014 Variabilité génétique de l'activité corticotrope chez le porc Large White et sélection divergente pour l'étude des caractères de robustesse. J. Rech. Porcine, sous presse.
52. Le Bail P.Y., Bugeon J., Dameron O., Fatet A., Golik W., Hocquette J.F., Hurtaud C., Hue I., Jondreville C., Joret L., Meunier-Salaun M.C., Vernet J., Nédellec C., Reichstadt M., Chemineau P., 2014. Un langage de référence pour le phénotypage des animaux d'élevage: l'ontologie ATOL. In: Phénotypage des animaux d'elevage. Phocas F. (Ed) Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 27, 195-208.
53. Le Bihan-Duval E., Talon R., Brochard M., Gautron J., Lefevre F., Larzul C., Baéza E., Hocquette J.F., 2014. Le phénotypage de la qualité des produits: enjeux et innovations. In: Phénotypage des animaux d'elevage. Phocas F. (Ed) Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 27, 223-234.
54. LeBlanc S.J., 2010. Monitoring metabolic health of dairy cattle in the transition period. J. Reprod. Dev., 56, S29-35.
55. LeBlanc S.J., 2012. Interactions of metabolism, inflammation, and reproductive tract health in the postpartum period in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 47, supl. 5, 18-30.
56. Li Z.Y., Wang Y.H., Kong W.J., Li C.F., Wang Z.X., Fu Z.F., 2013. Highly sensitive nearsimultaneous assay of multiple "lean meat agent" residues in swine urine using a disposable electrochemiluminescent immunosensors array. Biosens. Bioelectron., 39, 311-314.
57. Luxford B.G., Buis R.C., Beilharz R.G., 1990. Lifetime reproductive performance of lines of mice after long term selection for first parity litter size at birth. J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 107, 188-195.
58. Marchadier E., Carballido-Lopez R., Brinster S., Fabret C., Mervelet P., Bessieres P., Noirot-Gros M.F., Fromion V., Noirot P., 2011. An expanded protein-protein interaction network in Bacillus subtilis reveals a group of hubs: Exploration by an integrative approach. Proteomics, 11, 2981-2991.
59. Martin O., Sauvant D., 2010a. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling. Animal, 4, 2030-2047.
60. Martin O., Sauvant D., 2010b. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 2. Voluntary intake and energy partitioning. Animal, 4, 2048-2056.
61. Martin O., Blanc F., Agabriel J., Disenhaus C., Dupont J., Ponsart C., Paccard P., Pires J., Fréret S., Elis S., Gatien J., Salvetti P., Friggens N.C., 2012. A bovine reproductive physiology model to predict interactions between nutritional status and reproductive management. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 92, 551-565.
62. Mehta P.H., Gosling S.D., 2008. Bridging human and animal research: A comparative approach to studies of personality and health. Brain Behav. Immun., 22, 651-661.
63. Mormède P., Terenina E., 2012. Molecular genetics of the adrenocortical axis and breeding for robustness. Domestic Anim. Endocrinol., 43, 116-131.
64. Mormède P., Andanson S., Auperin B., Beerda B., Guemene D., Malmkvist J., Manteca X., Manteuffel G., Prunet P., Reenen C.G.V., Richard S., Veissier I., 2007. Exploration of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function as a tool to evaluate animal welfare. Physiol. Behav., 92, 317-339.
65. Mormède P., Foury A., Barat P., Corcuff J.B., Terenina E., Marissal-Arvy N., Moisan M.P. 2011. Molecular genetics of hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis activity and function. Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 1220, 127-136.
66. Nagai J., Harris D.L., McAllister A.J., 1980. Growth, feed efficiency and lifetime performance of crosses between lines selected for nursing ability and/or adult weight in mice. Genetics, 88, 761-780.
67. O'Donovan A., Sun B., Cole S., Rempel H., Lenoci M., Pulliam L., Neylan T., 2011. Transcriptional control of monocyte gene expression in post-traumatic stress disorder. Disease Markers, 30, 123-132.
68. Pei X.M., Zhang B., Tang J., Liu B.Q., Lai W.Q., Tang D.P., 2013. Sandwich-type immunosensors and immunoassays exploiting nanostructure labels: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta, 758, 1-18.
69. Phocas F., Agabriel J., Dupont-Nivet M., Geurden I., Médale F., Grasteau S., Gilbert H., Dourmad J.Y., 2014. Le phénotypage de l'efficacité alimentaire et de ses composantes, une nécessité pour accroître l'efficience des productions animales. In: Phénotypage des animaux d'elevage. Phocas F. (Ed) Dossier, INRA Prod. Anim., 27, 235-248.
70. Pinard-van der Laan M.H., 2002. Immune modulation: the genetic approach. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol., 87, 199-205.
71. Plaizier J.C., Krause D.O., Gozho G.N., McBride B.W., 2008. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: the physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet. J., 176, 21-31.
72. Pulendran B., 2009. Learning immunology from the yellow fever vaccine: innate immunity to systems vaccinology Nat. Rev. Immunol., 9, 741-747.
73. Quillet E., Dorson M., Le Guillou S., Benmansour A., Boudinot P., 2007. Wide range of susceptibility to rhabdoviruses in homozygous clones of rainbow trout. Fish Shellfish Immunol., 22, 510-519.
74. Ramos A., Mormède P., 1998. Stress and emotionality: a multidimensional and genetic approach. Neuroscience Biobehav. Rev., 22, 33-57.
75. Rauw W.M., Kanis E., Noordhuizen-Stassen E.N., Grommers F.J., 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 56, 15-33.
76. Roberts T., Chapinal N., Leblanc S.J., Kelton D.F., Dubuc J., Duffield T.F., 2012. Metabolic parameters in transition cows as indicators for early-lactation culling risk. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 3057-3063.
77. Royal M.D., Pryce J.E., Woolliams J.A., Flint A.P.F., 2002. The genetic relationship between commencement of luteal activity and calving interval, body condition score, production, and linear type traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 3071-3080.
78. Rupp R., Bergonier D., Dion S., Hygoneng M.C., Aurel M.R., Robert-Granié C., Foucras G., 2009. Response to somatic cell count-based selection for mastitis resistance in a divergent selection experiment in sheep. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 1203-1219.
79. Schadt E.E., 2009. Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases. Nature, 461, 218-223.
80. Soleimani A.F., Zulkifli I., Omar A.R., Raha A.R., 2011. Physiological responses of 3 chicken breeds to acute heat stress. Poult. Sci., 90, 1435-1440.
81. Star L., Ellen E.D., Uitdehaag K., Brom F.W.A., 2008. A plea to implement robustness into a breeding goal: Poultry as an example. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 21, 109-125.
82. Stearns S.C., 1992. The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford. p262.
83. Theilgaard P., Sánchez J., Pascual J.J., Berg P., Friggens N.C., Baselga M., 2007. Late reproductive senescence in a rabbit line hyper selected for reproductive longevity, and its association with body reserves. Gen. Sel. Evol., 39, 207-223.
84. Theilgaard P., Baselga M., Blas E., Friggens N.C., Cervera C., Pascual J.J., 2009. Differences in productive robustness in rabbits selected for reproductive longevity or litter size. Animal, 3, 637-646.
85. Thorup V.M., Edwards D., Friggens N.C., 2012. On-farm estimation of energy balance in dairy cows using only frequent body weight measurements and body condition score. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 1784-1793.
86. rd Ann. Meet. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Bratislava, Slovakia, 338.
87. Weiler U., Claus R., Schnoebelen-Combes S., Louveau I., 1998. Influence of age and genotype on endocrine parameters and growth performance: a comparative study in Wild boars, Meishan and Large White boars. Livest. Prod. Sci., 54, 21-31.
88. West-Eberhard M.J., 2003. Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. p814.
89. Wu S., Jin L., Vence L., Radvanyi L.G., 2010. Development and application of 'phosphoflow' as a tool for immunomonitoring. Expert review of vaccines, 9, 631-643.
90. Zdunczyk Z., Pareek C.S., 2009. Application of nutrigenomics tools in animal feeding and nutritional research. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 18, 3-16.
91. Zuccotti M., Merico V., Cecconi S., Redi CA, Garagna S., 2011. What does it take to make a developmentally competent mammalian egg? Hum. Reprod., 17, 525-540.