Towards operational definitions of robustness that rely on biology: Nutrition;Vers des définitions opérationnelles de la robustesse s'appuyant sur des faits biologiques: L'exemple de la nutrition

Productions Animales

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 43-52

  Friggens, N C ^a,b   Sauvant, D ^a,b   Martin, O ^a,b  

^a Universite de Nantes   (France)

^b INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84856801668     PISSN: 09900632     EISSN: 11525428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bauman D.E., Currie W.B., 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. J. Dairy Sci., 63, 1514-1525.
2. Beerda B., Ouweltjes W., Šebek L.B.J., Windig J.J., Veerkamp R.F., 2007. Effects of genotype by environment interactions on milk yield, energy balance, and protein balance. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 219-228.
3. Bryan., J.R., Lopez-Villalobos N., Pryce J.E., Holmes C.W., Johnson D.L., 2006. Reaction norms used to quantify the responses of New Zealand dairy cattle of mixed breeds to nutritional environment. N. Z. J. Agric. Res., 49, 371-381.
4. Chilliard Y., 1986. Variations quantitatives et métabolisme des lipides dans les tissus adipeux et le foie au cours du cycle gestation-lactation. 1ère partie: chez la ratte. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 26, 1057-1103.
5. Codrea M.C., Højsgaard S., Friggens N.C., 2010. On the use of differential smoothing to identify health and feeding disturbances from time-series measurements. J. Anim. Sci., sous presse.
6. Coulon J.B., Rémond B., 1991. Variations in milk output and milk protein content in response to the level of energy supply to the dairy cow: a review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 29, 31-47.
7. David J.R., Gilbert P., Moreteau B., 2004. Evolution of reaction norms. In: Phenotypic plasticity. functional and conceptual approaches. DeWitt T.J., Scheiner S.M. (Eds). Oxford University Press, New York, USA, 50-63.
8. Desnoyers M., Giger-Reverdin S., Duvaux-Ponter C., Sauvant D., 2009. Modelling offfeed periods caused by subacute acidosis in intensive lactating ruminants: application to goats. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 3894-3906.
9. DeWitt T.J., Sih A., Sloan Wilson D., 1998. Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol., 13, 77-81.
10. Friggens N.C., Newbold J.R., 2007. Towards a biological basis for predicting nutrient partitioning: the dairy cow as an example. Animal, 1, 87-97.
11. Højsgaard S., Friggens N.C., 2010. Quantifying degree of mastitis from common trends in a panel of indicators for mastitis in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 582-592.
12. Kitano H., 2004. Biological robustness. Nature Rev. Genet., 5, 826-837.
13. Knap P.W., 2009. Robustness. In: Resource allocation theory applied to farm animal production. Rauw W.A. (Ed). CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 288-301.
14. Kolmodin R., Strandberg E., Jorjani H., Danell B., 2003. Selection in the presence of a genotype by environment interaction: response in environmental sensitivity. Anim. Sci., 76, 375-386.
15. Lewontin R.C., 1974. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 26, 400-411.
16. Martin O., Sauvant D., 2010a. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling. Animal, sous presse.
17. Martin O., Sauvant D., 2010b. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 2. Voluntary intake and energy partitioning. Animal, sous presse.
18. Monod J., 1970. Le hasard et la nécessité: essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Le Seuil, Paris, France, 244p.
19. NRC, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
20. Oldham J.D., Emmans G.C., 1989. Prediction of responses to required nutrients in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 72, 3212-3229.
21. Ramsay J.O., Silverman B.W., 2005. Functional data analysis. Springer, N.Y., 430p.
22. Sauvant D., 1992. La modélisation systémique en nutrition. Rep. Nutr. Dev., 32, 217-230.
23. Sauvant D., 1999. Le concept de lois de réponses multiples aux régimes, trait d'union entre les domaines techniques et économiques de l'élevage. Renc. Rech. Rum., 11-17.
24. Sauvant, D., 2003. Modélisation des effets des interactions entre aliments sur les flux digestifs et métaboliques chez les bovins. Renc. Rech. Rum., 151-158.
25. Sauvant D., Giger-Reverdin S., 2010. Modélisation des interactions digestives et de la production de méthane chez les ruminants. INRA Prod. Anim., 22, 375-384.
26. Sauvant, D., Martin, O., 2010. Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité...les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d'élevage: définitions systémique et biologique des différents concepts. In: Robustesse, rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité, résilience... les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d'élevage. Sauvant D., Perez J.M. (Eds). Dossier Inra Prod. Anim., 23, 5-10.
27. Sauvant D., Soyeux Y., Chilliard Y., 1983. Réflexions sur l'étiopathogénie des maladies de la nutrition. Bull. Tech. CRZV Theix, 53, 117-121.
28. Sauvant D., Martin O., Mertens D.R., 2000. Mise au point d'un modèle empirique de réponses multiples de la digestion du bovin aux régimes. Renc. Rech. Rum., 341.
29. Sauvant D., Martin O., Mertens D.R., 2009, Influence of dietary NDF on energy partitioning in dairy cows, Annual ADSA-ASA meeting, Abstract, 790.
30. Strandberg E., 2009. The role of environmental sensitivity and plasticity in breeding for robustness: lessons from evolutionary genetics. EAAP Publication (Eds), Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 17-34.
31. Theilgaard,P., Sánchez J., Pascual J.J., Berg P., Friggens N.C., Baselga M., 2007. Late reproductive senescence in a rabbit line hyper selected for reproductive longevity, and its association with body reserves. Genet. Sel. Evol., 39, 207-223.
32. Van der Waaij E.H., 2004. Aresource allocation model describing consequences of artificial selection under metabolic stress. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 973-981.
33. Van Es A.J.H., Vermorel M., Bickel H., 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants: new energy systems in the Netherlands, France and Switzerland. Livest. Prod. Sci., 5, 327-330.
34. Waddington C.H., 1957. The strategy of the genes. A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. George Allen and Unwin, London, UK, 262p.