Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines using non-linear regression models

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Huang, Heyun ^a   Windig, Jack J ^a   Vereijken, Addie ^b   Calus, Mario P L ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Hendrix Genetics   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMEBIRD; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; HETEROGENEITY; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHICKEN; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EGG; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; INBRED STRAIN; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, INBRED STRAINS; CHICKENS; EGGS; FEMALE; GENOMICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84920754081     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-014-0075-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. de los Campos G, Hickey JM, Pong-Wong R, Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL: Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics 2013, 193:327-345.
2. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME: Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001, 157:1819-1829.
3. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA: Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3395.
4. Yan SC, Xu D, Zhang B.Y., Zhang HJ, Yang Q, Lin S: Graph embedding and extensions: A general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2007, 29:40-51.
5. Lin Y-Y, Liu T-L, Fuh C-S: Multiple kernel learning for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2011, 33:1147-1160.
6. Dadousis C, Veerkamp RF, Heringstad B, Pszczola M., Calus MPL: A comparison of principal component regression and genomic REML for genomic prediction across populations. Genet Sel Evol, 46:60.
7. Solberg TR, Sonesson AK, Woolliams J.A., Meuwissen THE: Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet Sel Evol 2009, 41:29.
8. Weber KL, Thallman RM, Keele J.W., Snelling WM, Bennett GL, Smith TPL, McDaneld TG, Allan MF, Van Eenennaam AL, Kuehn LA: Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes. J Anim Sci 2012, 90:4177-4190.
9. Daetwyler HD, Swan AA, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ: Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation. Genet Sel Evol 2012, 44:33.
10. Makgahlela ML, Mantysaari EA, Stranden I, Koivula M., Nielsen US, Sillanpaa MJ, Juga J: Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 2013, 130:10-19.
11. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli L.K., Goswami S., Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME: Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:4114-4129.
12. De Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME: Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics 2009, 183:1545-1553.
13. Schölkopf B, Smola AJ: A short introduction to learning with kernels. In Advanced Lectures on Machine Learning. Edited by Bousquet O, Rätsch G. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003:41-64.
14. Karoui S, Carabano MJ, Diaz C, Legarra A: Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol 2012, 44:39.
15. Legarra A, Baloche G, Barillet F., Astruc JM, Soulas C, Aguerre X, Arrese F., Mintegi L, Lasarte M, Maeztu F, Beltrán de Heredia I, Ugarte E: Within- and across-breed genomic predictions and genomic relationships for Western Pyrenees dairy sheep breeds Latxa, Manech, and Basco-Béarnaise. J Dairy Sci 2014, 97:3200-3212.
16. Olson KM, VanRaden PM, Tooker ME: Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss. J Dairy Sci 2012, 95:5378-5383.
17. Gianola D, van Kaam JBCHM: Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 2008, 178:2289-2303.
18. Morota G, Koyama M, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Gianola D: Predicting complex traits using a diffusion kernel on genetic markers with an application to dairy cattle and wheat data. Genet Sel Evol 2013, 45:17.
19. Gönen M, Alpaydin E: Supervised learning of local projection kernels. Neurocomputing 2010, 73:1694-1703.
20. Gönen M, Alpaydin E: Localized algorithms for multiple kernel learning. Pattern Recogn 2013, 46:795-807.
21. Sun Y, Todorovic S, Goodison S: Local-learning-based feature selection for high-dimensional data analysis. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2010, 32:1610-1626.
22. Calus MPL, Huang H, Vereijken A., Visscher J, Ten Napel J, Windig JJ: Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods. Genet Sel Evol 2014, 46:57.
23. Saunders C, Gammerman A, Vovk V: Ridge regression learning algorithm in dual variables. In ICML-1998 Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning. San Franciso: Morgan Kaufmann; 1998:515-521.
24. Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL, Pong-Wong R, de los Campos G, Hickey JM: Genomic prediction in animals and plants: simulation of data, validation, reporting, and benchmarking. Genetics 2013, 193:347-365.
25. Golub GH, Van Loan CF: Matrix computations. Ithaca, New York: JHU Press; 2012.
26. VanRaden PM: Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 2008, 91:4414-4423.
27. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis B.R., Thompson R: ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd: Hemel Hempstead; 2009.
28. Aguilar I, Misztal I, Johnson D.L., Legarra A., Tsuruta S, Lawlor TJ: Hot topic: a unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. J Dairy Sci 2010, 93:743-752.
29. de los Campos G, Gianola D, Rosa GJM, Weigel KA, Crossa J: Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet Res 2010, 92:295-308.
30. Men CQ, Wang WJ: Selection of Gaussian Kernel Parameter for SVM Based on Convex Estimation. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2008, 5263:709-714.
31. Wang J, Lu H, Plataniotis K.N., Lu JW: Gaussian kernel optimization for pattern classification. Pattern Recogn 2009, 42:1237-1247.
32. Prato M, Zanni L: A practical use of regularization for supervised learning with kernel methods. Pattern Recogn Lett 2013, 34:610-618.
33. Sotak GE Jr, Boyer KL: The Laplacian-of-Gaussian kernel: a formal analysis and design procedure for fast, accurate convolution and full-frame output. Comput Vision Graph 1989, 48:147-189.
34. Chen L, Ng R: On the marriage of Lp-norms and edit distance. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB Endowment, Volume 30. 2004:792-803.
35. Hofmann T, Schölkopf B, Smola AJ: Kernel methods in machine learning. Ann Stat 2008, 36:1171-1220.
36. Groenen MA, Megens H-J, Zare Y, Warren W.C., Hillier LW, Crooijmans RP, Vereijken A, Okimoto R, Muir WM, Cheng HH: The development and characterization of a 60 K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 2011, 12:274.
37. Canty A, Ripley B: boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.2-34. 2009.
38. Mäntysaari E, Liu Z, VanRaden P: Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations. Interbull Bull 2010, 41:17-22.
39. Liu Y, Liu Y, Chan KCC: Dimensionality reduction for heterogeneous dataset in rushes editing. Pattern Recogn 2009, 42:229-242.
40. Breiman L: Bagging predictors. Mach Learn 1996, 24:123-140.
41. Gianola D, Weigel KA, Kramer N, Stella A., Schon CC: Enhancing genome-enabled prediction by bagging genomic BLUP. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e91693.
42. Heslot N, Yang H-P, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L: Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci 2012, 52:146-160.
43. Wientjes YCJ, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL: The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics 2013, 193:621-631.