Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Daetwyler, Hans D ^a,b   Swan, Andrew A ^b,c   Van Der Werf, Julius Hj ^b,c   Hayes, Ben J ^a,b,d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES   (Australia)

^b Sheep CRC   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

^d LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ANCESTRY; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CARRION; CHROMOSOME; DATA INTERPRETATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FOOD QUALITY; GENETIC MARKER; GENOMICS; MEAT; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION SIZE; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELECTIVE BREEDING; SHEEP;

OVIS ARIES;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; FOOD QUALITY; GENETICS; GENOME; MEAT; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PEDIGREE; POPULATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHEEP; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; FOOD QUALITY; GENOME; MEAT; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; PEDIGREE; POPULATION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT, HERITABLE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHEEP, DOMESTIC;

EID: 84868651956     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-33     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. The Australian sheep industry-undergoing transformation. Rowe JB, Anim Prod Sci 2010 50 991 997 10.1071/AN10142
2. Australian prime lamb-a vision for 2020. Pethick D, Banks RG, Hales J, Ross JR, Int J Sheep Wool Sci 2006 54 66 73 (Pubitemid 44752465)
3. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733 (Pubitemid 32298846)
4. Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population. Daetwyler HD, Hickey JM, Henshall JM, Dominik S, Gredler B, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Anim Prod Sci 2010 50 1004 1010 10.1071/AN10096
5. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Wolc A, Stricker C, Arango J, Settar P, Fulton JE, O'Sullivan NP, Preisinger R, Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick DJ, Lamont SJ, Dekkers JC, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 5 10.1186/1297-9686-43-5 21255418
6. Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation. Saatchi M, McClure MC, McKay SD, Rolf MM, Kim J, Decker JE, Taxis TM, Chapple RH, Ramey HR, Northcutt SL, Bauck S, Woodward B, Dekkers JC, Fernando RL, Schnabel RD, Garrick DJ, Taylor JF, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 40 10.1186/1297-9686-43-40 22122853
7. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 433 443 10.3168/jds.2008-1646 19164653
8. A common reference population from four European Holstein populations increases reliability of genomic predictions. Lund MS, de Ross APW, de Vries AG, Druet T, Ducrocq V, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Guldbrandtsen B, Liu Z, Reents R, Schrooten C, Seefried F, Su G, Genet Sel Evol 2011 43 43 10.1186/1297-9686-43-43 22152008
9. Economic evaluation of whole genome selection, using meat sheep as a case study. Banks RG, van der Werf JHJ, Proceedings of the 18th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics: 28 September-1 October 2009; Barossa Valley AAABG Distributors, Armidale, Australia 2009 430 433
10. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. VanRaden PM, Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD, Taylor JF, Schenkel FS, J Dairy Sci 2009 92 16 24 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 19109259
11. Assessment of cross-validation strategies for genomic prediction in cattle. Erbe M, Pimentel ECG, Sharifi AR, Simianer H, 9th World Congress of Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 1-6 August 2009; Leipzig Gesellschaft für Tierzuchtwissenschaften e. V, Giessen, Germany 2010
12. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Legarra A, Robert-Granié C, Manfredi E, Elsen JM, Genetics 2008 180 611 618 10.1534/genetics.108.088575 18757934
13. Accuracy of genomic predictions of residual feed intake and 250-day body weight in growing heifers using 625,000 single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Pryce JE, Arias J, Bowman PJ, Davis SR, Macdonald KA, Waghorn GC, Wales WJ, Williams YJ, Spelman RJ, Hayes BJ, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 2108 2119 10.3168/jds.2011-4628 22459856
14. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 5 10.1186/1297-9686-42-5 20170500
15. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and implications for the makeup of reference populations in livestock breeding schemes. Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, Van der Werf JHJ, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 4 10.1186/1297-9686-44-4 22321529
16. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Pszczola M, Strabel T, Mulder HA, Calus MP, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 389 400 10.3168/jds.2011-4338 22192218
17. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian Red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Luan T, Woolliams JA, Lien S, Kent M, Svendsen M, Meuwissen THE, Genetics 2009 183 1119 1126 10.1534/genetics.109.107391 19704013
18. Predicting unobserved phenotypes for complex traits from whole-genome SNP data. Lee SH, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Visscher PM, PLoS Genet 2008 4 1000231 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000231 18949033
19. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Fisher RA, Biometrika 1915 10 507 521
20. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Henderson CR, Biometrics 1975 31 423 447 10.2307/2529430 1174616
21. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population. Daetwyler HD, Kemper KE, van der Werf JHJ, Hayes BJ, JAnim Sci 2012 90 3375 3384
22. Design and role of an information nucleus in sheep breeding programs. van der Werf JHJ, Kinghorn BP, Banks RG, Anim Prod Sci 2010 50 998 1003 10.1071/AN10151
23. Design and phenotyping procedures for recording wool, skin, parasite resistance, growth, carcass yield and quality traits of the SheepGENOMICS mapping flock. White JD, Allingham PG, Gorman CM, Emery DL, Hynd P, Owens J, Bell A, Siddell J, Harper G, Hayes BJ, Daetwyler HD, Usmar J, Goddard ME, Henshall JM, Dominik S, Brewer H, van der Werf JHJ, Nicholas FW, Warner R, Hofmyer C, Longhurst T, Fisher T, Swan P, Forage R, Oddy VH, Anim Prod Sci 2012 52 157 171 10.1071/AN11085
24. Using Australian sheep breeding values to increase lean meat yield percentage. Gardner GE, Williams A, Siddell J, Ball AJ, Mortimer S, Jacob RH, Pearce KL, Hocking Edwards JE, Rowe JB, Pethick DW, Anim Prod Sci 2010 50 1098 1106 10.1071/AN10144
25. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Scheet P, Stephens M, Am J Hum Genet 2006 78 629 644 10.1086/502802 16532393
26. A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals. Browning BL, Browning SR, AmJ Hum Genet 2009 84 210 223 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.01.005
27. Gilmour AR, Gogel B, Cullis BR, Thompson R, 2009 ASReml user guide release 3.0 VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead 2009
28. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, Goddard ME, Visscher PM, Nat Genet 2010 42 565 569 10.1038/ng.608 20562875
29. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with high density SNP panels. Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswani S, Bowman PJ, Reich CM, Mason BA, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 4114 4129 10.3168/jds.2011-5019 22720968
30. International Sheep Genomics Consortium: Genome-wide analysis of the World's sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection. Kijas JW, Lenstra JA, Hayes B, Boitard S, Porto Neto LR, San Cristobal M, Servin B, McCulloch R, Whan V, Gietzen K, Paiva S, Barendse W, Ciani E, Raadsma H, McEwan J, Dalrymple B, PLoS Biol 2012 10 1001258 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001258 22346734
31. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genetics 2010 185 1021 1031 10.1534/genetics.110.116855 20407128
32. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, PLoS ONE 2008 3 3395 10.1371/journal.pone.0003395 18852893
33. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard ME, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696
34. Identification of a missense mutation in the bovine ABCG2 gene with a major effect on the QTL on chromosome 6 affecting milk yield and composition in Holstein cattle. Cohen-Zinder M, Seroussi E, Larkin DM, Loor JJ, Everts-van der Wind A, Lee JH, Drackley JK, Band MR, Hernandez AG, Shani M, Lewin HA, Weller JI, Ron M, Genome Res 2005 15 936 944 10.1101/gr.3806705 15998908 (Pubitemid 40994213)
35. Cloning, mapping and association studies of the ovine ABCG2 gene with facial eczema disease in sheep. Duncan EJ, Dodds KG, Henry HM, Thompson MP, Phua SH, Anim Genet 2007 38 126 131 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2006.01557.x 17403009 (Pubitemid 46525313)
36. In vitro and in vivo developmental capacity of oocytes from prepubertal and adult sheep. O'Brien JK, Catt SL, Ireland KA, Maxwell WM, Evans G, Theriogenology 1997 47 1433 1443 10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00134-9 16728089 (Pubitemid 28137040)
37. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. Meuwissen THE, J Anim Sci 1997 75 934 940 9110204 (Pubitemid 127441682)
38. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Grundy B, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Genet Res 1998 72 159 168 10.1017/S0016672398003474 (Pubitemid 28563163)
39. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding. Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 27 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27 22898324
40. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information. Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, J Dairy Sci 2012 95 377 388 10.3168/jds.2011-4254 22192217
41. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Meuwissen T, Goddard M, Genetics 2010 185 623 631 10.1534/genetics.110.116590 20308278
42. Using whole-genome sequence data to predict quantitative trait phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Ober U, Ayroles JF, Stone EA, Richards S, Zhu D, Gibbs RA, Stricker C, Gianola D, Schlather M, Mackay TFC, Simianer H, PLoS Genet 2012 8 1002685 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685 22570636
43. Daetwyler HD, Genome-wide evaluation of populations PhD thesis. Wageningen University 2009 ISBN: 978-90-8585-528-6