Dynamic aspects of entitativity: From group perceptions to social interaction

Social Cognition Social Identity and Intergroup Relations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 27-52

  Hamilton, David L ^a   Chen, Jacqueline M ^a   Way, Nate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920582826     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203816790     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., & Banaji, M. R. (1998). Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 243-250.
2. Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Askevis-Leherpeux, F. (2005). For and against: Perceived entitativity of supportive and opposed opinion groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 27-37.
4. Brewer, M. B. (1979). Ingroup bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307-324.
5. Brewer, M. B., & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of per- ceiver motivation. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Brewer, M. B., Hong, Y., & Li, Q. (2004). Dynamic entitativity: Perceiving groups as actors. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essen- tialism (pp. 25-38). New York: Psychology Press.
7. Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., & Carini, B. (1995). Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 29-40.
8. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
9. Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (2005). Linking vs thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 884-898.
10. Castano, E., Sacchi, S., & Gries, P. H. (2003). The perception of the other in international relations: Evidence for the polarizing effect of entitativity. Political Psychology, 24, 449-468.
11. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of in-group entitativity on in-group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735-754.
12. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M.-P, & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore I exist: In-group identification, in-group entitativity, and in-group bias. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 28, 135-143.
13. Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). Perceived entitativ- ity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1076-1094.
14. Crump, S. A., Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Lickel, B., & Thakkar, V. (2010). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1212-1230.
15. Dasgupta, N., Banaji, M. R., & Abelson, R. P (1999). Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 991-1003.
16. Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Ethier, K. A. (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280-291.
17. Denson, T. F., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D. M., & Ames, D. R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 43-61.
18. Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., & O’Mara, M. M. (2008). When rejection by one fosters aggression against many: Multiple-victim aggression as a consequence of social rejection and perceived groupness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 958-970.
19. Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., Witt, M., & Orina, M. M. (2006). Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive in-group regard. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 426-439.
20. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Hamilton, D. L. (2007). Understanding the complexities of group perception: Broandening the domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1077-1101.
22. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
23. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name…: The role of entitativity in group perception. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 139-166). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., Crump, S. A., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2009). The role of entitativity in stereotyping: Processes and parameters. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 179-198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Maddox, K. B. (1999). Dualities and conti- nua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 606-626). New York: Guilford Press.
27. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Rodgers, J. S. (2004). Perceiving the group- ness of groups: Entitativity, homogeneity, essentialism, and stereotypes. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 39-60). New York: Psychology Press.
28. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
29. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2004). Essentialism and entitativity: Structures of beliefs about the ontology of social categories. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception (pp. 61-78). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
30. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
31. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
32. Hogg, M. A. (2004). The social identity perspective: Intergroup relations, selfconception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 246-276.
33. Hogg, M. A., Sherman, D. K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A. T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135-142.
34. Ip, G., Chiu, C., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381.
35. Johnson, A. L., Crawford, M. T., Sherman, S. J., Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., Ferreira, M., et al. (2006). A functional perspective on group memberships: Differential need fulfillment in a group typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 707-719.
36. Johnson, A. L., & Queller, S. (2003). The mental representations of high and low entitativity groups. Social Cognition, 21(2), 101-119.
37. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2001). Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relational styles, and the perception of group entitativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 129-140.
38. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
39. Lickel, B., Rutchick, A., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2006). Intuitive theories of group types and relational principles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 28-39.
40. Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194-204.
41. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Online and memory-based aspects of individual and group target judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 173-185.
42. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 750-762.
43. Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1999). Culture and the con- strual of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.
44. Moreland, R. L., & McMinn, J. G. (2004). Entitativity and social integration: Managing beliefs about the reality of groups. In V. Yzerbyt, C. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Contributions to the study of homogeneity, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 419-437). New York: Psychology Press.
45. Pickett, C. L. (2001). The effects of entitativity beliefs on implicit comparisons between group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 515-525.
46. Pickett, C. L., & Perrott, D. A. (2004). Shall I compare thee? Perceived enti- tativity and ease of comparison. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 283-289.
47. Pickett, C. L., Silver, M. D., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). The impact of assimilation and differentiation needs on perceived group importance and judgments of in-group size. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 546-568.
48. Pilialoha, B. R. U., & Brewer, M. B. (2006). Motivated entitativity: Applying balance theory to group perception. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 235-247.
49. Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common- interest and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
50. Rothbart, M., & Park, B. (2004). The mental representation of social categories: Category boundaries, entitativity, and essentialism. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 79-100). New York: Psychology Press.
51. Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11-36). London: Sage.
52. Rutchick, A. M., Hamilton, D. L., & Sack, J. D. (2008). Antecedents of entitativ- ity in categorically and dynamically construed groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 905-921.
53. Rydell, R. J., & McConnell, A. R. (2005). Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 99-110.
54. Sherman, D. K., Hogg, M. A., & Maitner, A. T. (2009). Perceived polarization: Reconciling in-group and intergroup perceptions under uncertainty. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 95-109.
55. Sherman, S. J., Castelli, L., & Hamilton, D. L. (2002). The spontaneous use of a group typology as an organizing principle in memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 328-342.
56. Sherman, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativ- ity and the social identity value of group memberships. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80-110). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
57. Sherman, S. J., & Johnson, A. L. (2003). Perceiving groups: How, what and why? In G. V. Bodenahusen & A. J. Lambert (Eds.), Foundations of social cognition: A Festschrift in honor of Robert S. Wyer, Jr. (pp. 155-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Spencer-Rodgers, J., Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The central role of entitativity in stereotypes of social categories and task groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 369-388.
59. Spencer-Rodgers, J., Williams, M. J., Hamilton, D. L., Peng, K., & Wang, L. (2007). Culture and group perception: Dispositional and stereotypic inferences about novel and national groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 525-543.
60. Taylor, S., Fiske, S., Etcoff, N., & Ruderman, A. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
61. Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: Evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1051-1065.
62. Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549-562.
63. Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2004). The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 482-493.
64. Uleman, J. S., Saribay, S. A., & Gonzalez, C. (2008). Spontaneous inferences, implicit impressions, and implicit theories. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 329-360.
65. Welbourne, J. L. (1999). The impact of perceived entitativity on inconsistency resolution for groups and individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 481-508.
66. Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (1998). Categorical and dynamic groups: Implication for social perception and intergroup behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67. Winter, L. & Uleman, J. S. (1984). When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 237-252.
68. Wyer, R. S., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Srull, T. K. (1984). The cognitive representation of persons and groups and its effect on recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 445-469.
69. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-Ph., & Paladino, P. (2000). The primacy of the in-group: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.
70. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Corneille, O., & Estrada, C. (2001). The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 141-155.
71. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Fiske, S. (1998). Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1090-1104