The Primacy of the Ingroup: The Interplay of Entitativity and Identification

European Review of Social Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 257-295

  Yzerbyt, Vincent ^a   Castano, Emanuele ^a   Leyens, Jacques Philippe ^a   Paladino, Maria Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899873553     PISSN: 10463283     EISSN: 1479277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14792772043000059     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Abelson, R. P., Dasgupta, N., Park, J., and Banaji, M. R., 1998. Perceptions of the collective other. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2: 243–50.
2. Allport, F. H., 1924. Social Psychology Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Allport, G. W., 1954. The Nature of Prejudice Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Allport, G. W., and Kramer, B. M., 1946. Some roots of prejudice. Journal of Psychology, 22: 9–39.
5. Bartsch, R. A., and Judd, C. M., 1995. Majority-minority status and perceived ingroup variability revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23: 471–83.
6. Baumeister, R. F., and Leary, M. R., 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117: 497–529.
7. Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., and Billings, L. S., 1999. Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 523–42.
8. Blascovich, J., Wyer, N. A., Swart, L. A., and Kibler, J. L., 1997. Racism and social categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 1364–72.
9. Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., and Coleman, J., 1993. In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19: 381–8.
10. Brewer, M. B., 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86: 61–79.
11. Brewer, M. B., 1991. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17: 475–82.
12. Brewer, M. B., and Brown, R. J., 1998. “ Intergroup relations ”. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn, Edited by: Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G., Vol. 2, 554–94. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
13. Brewer, M. B., and Harasty, A. S., 1996. “ Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation ”. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition, Edited by: Sorrentino, R. M., and Higgins, E. T., Vol. 3, New York: Guilford.
14. Brewer, M. B., Weber, J. G., and Carini, B., 1995. Person memory in intergroup contexts: Categorization versus individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 9–40.
15. Campbell, D. T., 1958. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of person as social entities. Behavioural Science, 3: 14–25.
16. Capozza, D., and Volpato, C., 1990. Categorical differentiation and intergroup relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29: 93–5.
17. Capozza, D., Dazzi, C., and Minto, B., 1996. Ingroup overexclusion: A confirmation of the effect. International Review of Social Psychology, 9: 7–18.
18. Capozza, D., Voci, A., and Toaldo, A., 1998. Judgments of categorical belonging in an inferior status group Unpublished manuscript, University of Padua
19. Carter, L. F., 1948. The identification of “racial membership”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43: 279–86.
20. Castano, E., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1998. The high and lows of group homogeneity. Behavioural Processes, 42: 219–38.
21. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Bourguignon, D., 1998. We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on social identification Manuscript submitted for publication. Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
22. Castano, E., Paladino, M. P., Coull, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1999. Preserving the ingroup entitativity: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members Manuscript submitted for publication. Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
23. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Bourguignon, D., and Seron, E., 2000. Who may come in? The impact of ingroup identification on ingroup-outgroup categorization Manuscript submitted for publication. Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
24. Cialdini, R. B., Borden, R. J., Thorne, A., Walker, M. R., Freeman, S., and Sloan, R. L., 1976. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34: 366–75.
25. Coovert, M. D., and Reeder, G. D., 1990. Negativity effects in impression formation: The role of unit formation and schematic expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26: 49–62.
26. Coull, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1999. Cognitive resources and stereotype preservation: Just gimme a moment Manuscript submitted for publication, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
27. Coull, A., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Paladino, P., and Leemans, V., 1999. Dealing with a deviant ingroup member: Motivated stereotyping has a cognitive price Manuscript submitted for publication, Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
28. De Cremer, D., and Vanbeselaere, N., 1999. I am deviant, because… The impact of situational factors upon the black sheep effect. Psychologica Belgica, 39: 71–9.
29. Dépret, E., and Fiske, S. T., 1999. Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35: 461–80.
30. Deschamps, J.-C., 1973–1974. L'attribution, la catégorisation sociale et les relations intergroupes. Bulletin de Psychologie, 27: 710–21.
31. Devos, T., Comby, L., and Deschamps, J.-C., 1996. “ Asymmetries in judgments of ingroup and outgroup variability ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 7, 95–144. Chichester: Wiley.
32. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., and Spears, R., 1995. Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 31: 410–36.
33. Doosje, B., Spears, R., Ellemers, N., and Koomen, W., 1999. “ Perceived group variability in intergroup relations: The distinctive role of social identity ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 10, Chichester: Wiley.
34. Eberhardt, J. L., and Randall, J. L., 1997. The essential notion of race. Psychological Science, 8: 198–203.
35. Elliott, D. N., and Wittenberg, B. H., 1955. Accuracy of identification of Jewish and non-Jewish photographs. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51: 339–41.
36. Festinger, L., 1950. Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57: 271–82.
37. Festinger, L., 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7: 117–40.
38. Festinger, L., and Thibaut, J., 1951. Interpersonal communication in small groups. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 46: 92–9.
39. Gaertner, L., and Schopler, J., 1998. Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28: 963–80.
40. Gerard, H. B., 1953. The effect of different dimensions of disagreement on the communication process in small groups. Human Relations, 6: 249–71.
41. Hamilton, D. H., and Sherman, S. J., 1996. Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103: 336–55.
42. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., and Lickel, B., 1998. “ Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum ”. In Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, Edited by: Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., and Insko, C. A., 47–74. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., and Maddox, K. B., 1998. “ Dualities and continua: Implications for understanding perceptions of persons and groups ”. In Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology, Edited by: Chaiken, S., and Trope, Y., New York: Guilford.
44. Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., and Ernst, D., 2000. Essentialists' beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 113–27.
45. Haslam, S. A., Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., and McGarty, C., 1995. Social categorization and group homogeneity: Changes in the perceived applicability of stereotype content as a function of comparative context and trait favourableness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34: 139–60.
46. Hewstone, M., 1994. “ Revision and change of stereotypic beliefs: In search of the elusive subtyping model ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 5, 69–109. Chichester: Wiley.
47. Hobbes, T., 1651/1904. Leviathan Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Hogg, M. A., 1992. The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
49. Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D., 1988. Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes London: Routledge.
50. Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D., 1993. “ Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation ”. In Group Motivation, Edited by: Hogg, M. A., and Abrams, D., 173–90. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
51. Hogg, M. A., Hardie, E. A., and Reynolds, K., 1995. Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 159–79.
52. Hogg, M. A., and Mullin, B. A., 1998. “ Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification ”. In Social Identity and Social Cognition, Edited by: Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A., 247–79. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Horwitz, M., and Rabbie, J. M., 1982. “ Individuality and membership in the intergroup system ”. In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Edited by: Tajfel, H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Insko, C. A., and Schopler, J., 1998. “ Differential distrust of groups and individuals ”. In Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, Edited by: Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., and Insko, C. A., 75–107. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Johnston, L., and Hewstone, M., 1992. Cognitive models of stereotype change, 3: Subtyping and the perceived typicality of disconfirming groups members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28: 360–86.
56. Judd, C. M., and Park, B., 1988. Outgroup homogeneity: Judgments of variability at the individual and group levels. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 778–88.
57. Kelly, C., 1989. Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28: 239–50.
58. Kraus, S., Ryan, C. S., Judd, C. M., Hastie, R., and Park, B., 1993. Use of mental frequency distributions to represent variability among members of social categories. Social Cognition, 11: 22–43.
59. Kunda, Z., 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 480–98.
60. Kunda, Z., and Oleson, K. C., 1995. Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: Constructing grounds for subtyping deviants. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68: 565–79.
61. Kunda, Z., and Oleson, K. C., 1997. When exceptions prove the rule: How extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5: 965–79.
62. LeBon, G., 1895/1983. Psychologie des Foules Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
63. Lee, Y. T., and Ottati, V., 1995. Perceived in-group homogeneity as a function of group membership salience and stereotype threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21: 610–19.
64. Lemaine, G., 1974. Social identification and social originality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 4: 17–52.
65. Levine, J., and Moreland, R., 1995. “ Group processes ”. In Advanced Social Psychology, Edited by: Tesser, A., 419–65. New York: McGraw-Hill.
66. Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., and Dweck, C. S., 1998. Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74: 1421–36.
67. Lewin, K., 1951. Field Theories in Social Science New York: Harper.
68. Leyens, J.-Ph., and Schadron, G., 1980. Porque discriminam mais os grupos que os individuos? Categorizacão ou pretexto?. Psicologia, 2: 161–8.
69. Leyens, J.-Ph., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1992. The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical information search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22: 549–69.
70. Leyens, J.-Ph., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Bellour, F., 1993. “ Social judgeability and motivation: the ingroup overexclusion effect ”. In Studies on the Self and Social Cognition, Edited by: Pichevin, M.-F., Hurtig, M.-C., and Piolat, M., Singapore: World Scientific.
71. Leyens, J.-Ph., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Schadron, G., 1992. “ The social judgeability approach to stereotypes ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 3, 91–120. Chichester: Wiley.
72. Leyens, J.-Ph., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Schadron, G., 1994. Stereotypes and Social Cognition London: Sage.
73. Lickel, B., Hamilton, D., Wiecaorkowska, G., Lewis, A. C., Sherman, S. J., and Uhles, A. N., 1998. Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Santa Barbara
74. Lindzey, G., and Rogolsky, S., 1950. Prejudice and identification of minority group membership. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45: 37–53.
75. Linville, P. W., Fisher, G. W., and Salovey, P., 1989. Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 165–88.
76. Linville, P. W., Salovey, P., and Fisher, G. W., 1986. “ Stereotyping and perceived distributions of social characteristics: An application to ingroup-outgroup perception ”. In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, Edited by: Dovidio, J. F., and Gaertner, S. L., 165–208. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
77. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., 1998. “ Group status and perceptions of homogeneity ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 9, 31–75. Chichester: Wiley.
78. Marques, J. M., and Paez, D., 1994. “ The ‘Black Sheep Effect’: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 5, Chichester: Wiley.
79. Marques, J. M., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1988. The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 287–92.
80. Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Leyens, J.-Ph., 1988. Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18: 1–16.
81. Maurer, K. L., Park, B., and Rothbart, M., 1995. Subtyping versus subgrouping processes in stereotype representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 812–24.
82. McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., and Hamilton, D. L., 1997. Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72: 750–62.
83. McGarty, C., Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., and Grace, D. M., 1995. Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34: 237–56.
84. Medin, D. L., and Ortony, A., 1989. “ Psychological essentialism ”. In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Edited by: Vosnaidou, S., and Ortony, A., 179–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Menon, T., Morris, M., Chiu, C. Y., and Hong, Y. Y., 1998. Culture and attributions to individuals versus groups: North Americans attribute to personal dispositions; East asians attribute to dispositions of social collectives Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University
86. Messick, D. M., and Mackie, D. M., 1989. “ Intergroup relations ”. In Annual Review of Psychology, Edited by: Rosenzweig, M. R., and Porter, L. W., Vol. 40, 45–81. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
87. Mullen, B., 1991. Group composition, salience, and cognitive representation: The phenomenology of being a group. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27: 297–323.
88. Mummendey, A., 1995. Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 657–70.
89. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., and Turner, J. C., 1994. Stereotypes and Social Reality Oxford: Blackwell.
90. Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., and Haslam, S. A., 1991. Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30: 125–44.
91. Ostrom, T. M., and Sedikides, C., 1992. Out-group homogeneity effect in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 536–52.
92. Park, B., and Judd, C. M., 1990. Measures and model of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 173–91.
93. Peeters, G., and Czapinski, J., 1990. “ Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 1, 33–60. Chichester: Wiley.
94. Perdue, C. W., Dovidio, J. F., Gurtman, M. B., and Tyler, R. B., 1990. “Us” and “them”: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59: 475–86.
95. Pettigrew, T. F., Allport, G. W., and Barnett, E. O., 1958. Binocular resolution and perception of race in South Africa. British Journal of Psychology, 49: 265–78.
96. Quanty, M. B., Keats, J. A., and Harkins, S. G., 1975. Prejudice and criteria for identification of ethnic photographs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32: 449–54.
97. Quattrone, G. A., 1986. “ On the perception of a group's variability ”. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Edited by: Worchel, S., and Austin, W. G., Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
98. Rogier, A., and Yzerbyt, V. Y., 1999. Social attribution: The role of homogeneity in subjective essentialism. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58: 233–40.
99. Rothbart, M., and Taylor, M., 1992. “ Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? ”. In Language, Interaction and Social Cognition, Edited by: Sewin, G., and Fiedler, K., 11–36. London: Sage.
100. Rothgerber, H., 1997. External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73: 1206–12.
101. Schachter, S., 1951. Deviation, rejection and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46: 190–207.
102. Schachter, S., 1959. The Psychology of Affiliation Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
103. Schopler, J., and Insko, C. A., 1992. “ The discontent effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: Generality and mediation ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 3, 121–52. Chichester: Wiley.
104. Sherif, M., 1967. Group Conflict and Cooperation: Their Social Psychology London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
105. Sherif, M., and Hovland, C. I., 1961. Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
106. Shermann, S. J., Hamilton, D. L., and Lewis, A. C., 1999. “ Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group membership ”. In Social Identity and Social Cognition, Edited by: Abrams, D., and Hogg, M., 80–100. Oxford: Blackwell.
107. Simon, B., 1992. “ The perception of ingroup and outgroup homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context ”. In European Review of Social Psychology, Edited by: Stroebe, W., and Hewstone, M., Vol. 3, Chichester: Wiley.
108. Simon, B., and Brown, R. J., 1987. Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 703–11.
109. Simon, B., and Pettigrew, T. F., 1990. Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20: 269–86.
110. Spears, R., Oakes, P. J., Ellemers, N., and Haslam, S. A., 1997. The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life Oxford: Blackwell.
111. Stephan, W. G., 1977. Cognitive differentiation in intergroup perception. Sociometry, 40: 50–8.
112. Stevens, L. E., and Fiske, S. T., 1995. Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social cognition, 13: 189–214.
113. Stroebe, W., and Insko, C. A., 1989. “ Stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. Changing conceptions in theory and research ”. In Stereotypes and Prejudice: Changing Conceptions, Edited by: Bar-Tal, D., Grauman, C. F., Kruglanski, A. W., and Stroebe, W., 3–34. New York: Springer-Verlag.
114. Tajfel, H., 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Tajfel, H., and Turner, J. C., 1979. “ An integrative theory of intergroup relations ”. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Edited by: Austin, W. G., and Worchel, S., Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
116. Tajfel, H., Billig, M., Bundy, R., and Flament, C., 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1: 149–78.
117. Turner, J. C., 1991. Social Influence Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
118. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., and Wheterel, M. S., 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group. A Self-Categorization Theory Oxford: Blackwell.
119. Vanbeselaere, N., 1991. The impact of in-group and out-group homogeneity/heterogeneity upon intergroup relations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12: 291–301.
120. Weber, R., and Crocker, J., 1983. Cognitive processing in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45: 961–77.
121. Wilder, D. A., 1978. Perceiving persons as a group: Effects on attributions of causality and beliefs. Social Psychology, 1: 13–23.
122. Wilder, D. A., 1986. “ Social categorisation: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup bias ”. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Edited by: Berkowitz, L., Vol. 19, 291–355. New York: Academic Press.
123. Wilder, D. A., and Simon, A., 1998. “ The group as a category and an interactive entity: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior ”. In Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, Edited by: Sedikides, C., Schopler, J., and Insko, C. A., 27–44. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
124. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., and Seron, E., 1998a. The ingroup overexclusion effect: The role of social identification and ingroup homogeneity Manuscript submitted for publication. Catholic University of Louvain at Louvain-la-Neuve
125. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Coull, A. I., and Rocher, S., 1999. Fencing off the deviant: The role of cognitive resources in the maintenance of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 449–62.
126. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Dardenne, B., and Leyens, J.-Ph., 1998b. “ Social judgeability concerns in impression formation ”. In Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions, Edited by: Yzerbyt, V. Y., Lories, G., and Dardenne, B., 126–56. London: Sage.
127. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Leyens, J.-Ph., and Bellour, F., 1995. The ingroup overexclusion effect: Identity concerns in decision about group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25: 1–16.
128. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S., and Schadron, G., 1997. “ Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception ”. In The Psychology of Stereotyping and Group Life, Edited by: Spears, R., Oakes, P., Ellemers, N., and Haslam, A., London: Basil Blackwell.
129. Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Rogier, A., in press. “ Blame it on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism and social attribution ”. In The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice, and Intergroup Relations, Edited by: Jost, J., and Major, B., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., and Fiske, S., 1998c. Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24: 1090–104.
131. Yzerbyt, V. Y., and Schadron, G., 1996. Connaǐtre et Juger Autrui: Une Introduction à la Cognition Sociale Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
132. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Schadron, G., Leyens, J.-Ph., and Rocher, S., 1994. Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66: 48–55.