An instructional model for web-based e-learning education with a blended learning process approach

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 217-235

  Alonso, Fernando ^a,b,c   López, Genoveva ^a   Manrique, Daniel ^a   Viñes, José M ^d  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b Centre of Computing and Communications Technology Transfer   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLENDED LEARNING PROCESS APPROACH; PSYCHOPEDAGOGICAL PROBLEMS; WEB-BASED E-LEARNING EDUCATION;

CODES (STANDARDS); DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646695916     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Bixler, B. & Spotts, L. (2000). Screen design and levels of interactivity in web-based training [WWW document]. URL http://www.clat.psu.edu/ homes/jds/john/research/ivla1998/ivla98.html (13th June 2003).
3. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, book 1, cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
4. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K. & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Sprio (Eds), Cognition, Education and Multimedia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, 115-141.
5. Clark, R. (1999). Developing technical training. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
6. Clark, R. (2003). Building expertise. Cognitive methods for training and performance Improvement. Washington, DC: Book of International Society for Performance Improvement.
7. Clark, R. & Mayer, R. (2002). E-Learning and the science of instruction. Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
8. Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Level of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11, 671-684.
9. Cross, J. (2003). The life and death of eLearning. Learning from worst & best practice, E-Learning Conference, Manchester, 18-19 March.
10. Davies, D. (2003). Design content for blended learning solution, E-Learning Conference, Manchester, 18-19 March.
11. Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D. & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds) (1999). How people learn: bridging research and practice. Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, Washington DC: National Research Council.
12. EC [European Commission] (2001). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: the e-Learning action plan, Brussels, 28.3.
13. Gell-Mann, M. (1996). A commentary to R Schank. In J. Brockman (Ed.), The third culture: beyond the scientific revolution. New York: Touchtone Books, 167-180.
14. Good, T. L. & Brophy, J. E. (1990). Educational psychology: a realistic approach (4th ed.). Longman, NY: White Plains.
15. Govindasamy, T. (2002). Successful implementation of e-Learning pedagogical considerations. Internet and Higher Education 4, 287-299.
16. Hulm, C. (2003). Implementing a blended approach with your e-Learning, E-Learning Conference, Manchester, 18-19 March.
17. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology and Research and Development 39, 5-14.
18. Merrill, D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 279-333.
19. Merrill, D. (1997). Instructional strategies that teach. CBT Solutions, November-December, 1-11.
20. Michell, L. (2001). E-Learning methods offer a personalized approach. Info World, April.
21. Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities In Cyberspace: effective strategies for online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22. Palloff, R. & Pratt, K. (2003). The virtual student: a profile and guide to working with online learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Pazos, J., Azpiazu, J., Silva, A. & Rodríguez-Patón, A. (2002). A virtual classroom based on academic memories. Proceedings ICTE2002 of Information Society and Education: Monitoring a Revolution, Badajoz, Spain, pp. 87-92.
24. Rumelhart, V. E. & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning and restructuring: three modes of learning. In J. W. Cotton & R. Klatzky (Eds), Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: how to integrate online and traditional learning. New Jersey: Kogan Page.
26. Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
27. Schulman, L. S. (1999). Taking Learning Seriously. Change Magazine 31, 10-17.
28. Schulman, L. S. (2002). Making differences: a table of learning. Change 34, 36-44.
29. URL: INAP. Retrieved online November 11, 2003, from http://www.teleinap. com
30. URL: Line Zine. Retrieved online June 14, 2002, from http://www.linezine. com/elearning.htm