Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice

Physiology and Behavior

Volumn 140, Issue , 2015, Pages 156-163

  Sclafani, Anthony ^a   Ackroff, Karen ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

C57BL 6J mice; Flavor nutrient learning; Flavor taste learning; Fructose; Galactose; Glucose

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; FLAVORING AGENT; METHYLGLUCOSIDE; TRANSIENT RECEPTOR POTENTIAL CHANNEL M; TRPM5 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CLASSIFICATION; CONDITIONED REFLEX; DEFICIENCY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECTS; EATING; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCE; GENETICS; KNOCKOUT MOUSE; MALE; MOUSE; TASTE;

ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATES; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EATING; FEMALE; FLAVORING AGENTS; FOOD PREFERENCES; MALE; METHYLGLUCOSIDES; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; TASTE; TRPM CATION CHANNELS;

EID: 84920088982     PISSN: 00319384     EISSN: 1873507X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Sucrose to Polycose preference shifts in rats: the role of taste, osmolality and the fructose moiety. Physiol. Behav. 1991, 49:1047-1060.
2. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in male and female rats: effects of sweet taste and sugar concentration. Appetite 2004, 42:287-297.
3. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Flavor preference conditioned by oral monosodium glutamate in mice. Chem. Senses 2013, 38:745-758.
4. Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 133:92-98.
5. Ackroff K., Touzani K., Peets T.K., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 72:691-703.
6. Azzara A.V., Sclafani A. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric sugar infusions in rats: maltose is more reinforcing than sucrose. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 64:535-541.
7. Damak S., Rong M., Yasumatsu K., Kokrashvili Z., Perez C.A., Shigemura N., Yoshida R., Mosinger B., Glendinning J.I., Ninomiya Y., Margolskee R.F. Trpm5 null mice respond to bitter, sweet, and umami compounds. Chem. Senses 2006, 31:253-264.
8. Damak S., Rong M., Yasumatsu K., Kokrashvili Z., Varadarajan V., Zou S., Jiang P., Ninomiya Y., Margolskee R.F. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science 2003, 301:850-853.
9. de Araujo I.E., Oliveira-Maia A.J., Sotnikova T.D., Gainetdinov R.R., Caron M.G., Nicolelis M.A.L., Simon S.A. Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling. Neuron 2008, 57:930-941.
10. Dwyer D.M., Haselgrove M., Jones P.M. Cue interactions in flavor preference learning: a configural analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2011, 37:41-57.
11. Glendinning J.I., Beltran F., Benton L., Cheng S., Gieseke J., Gillman J., Spain H.N. Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 299:R1333-R1341.
12. Jakinovich W. Taste aversion to sugars by the gerbil. Physiol. Behav. 1982, 28:1065-1071.
13. Jakinovich W., Goldstein I.J. Stimulation of the gerbil's gustatory receptors by monosaccharides. Brain Res. 1976, 110:491-504.
14. Matsumura S., Yoneda T., Aki S., Eguchi A., Manabe Y., Tsuzuki S., Inoue K., Fushiki T. Intragastric infusion of glucose enhances the rewarding effect of sorbitol fatty acid ester ingestion as measured by conditioned place preference in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2010, 99:509-514.
15. Noma A., Goto J., Sato M. The relative taste effectiveness of various sugars and sugar alcohols for the rat. Kumamoto Med. J. 1971, 24:1-9.
16. Pinhas A., Aviel M., Koen M., Gurgov S., Acosta V., Israel M., Kakuriev L., Guskova L., Fuzailov I., Touzani K., Sclafani A., Bodnar R.J. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 105:451-459.
17. Sclafani A. How food preferences are learned - laboratory animal models. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1995, 54:419-427.
18. Sclafani A. Gut-brain nutrient signaling: appetition vs. satiation. Appetite 2013, 71:454-458.
19. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 106:457-461.
20. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. The role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2012, 302:R1119-R1133.
21. Sclafani A., Ackroff K. Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats. Chem. Senses 2014, (in press).
22. Sclafani A., Cardieri C., Tucker K., Blusk D., Ackroff K. Intragastric glucose but not fructose conditions robust flavor preferences in rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1993, 265:R320-R325.
23. Sclafani A., Fanizza L.J., Azzara A.V. Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose and fructose in rats. Physiol. Behav. 1999, 67:227-234.
24. Sclafani A., Glass D.S., Margolskee R.F., Glendinning J.I. Gut T1r3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 299:R1643-R1650.
25. Sclafani A., Marambaud P., Ackroff K. Sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sweet ageusic T1r3 and Calhm1 knockout mice. Physiol. Behav. 2014, 126:25-29.
26. Sclafani A., Williams D.L. Galactose consumption induces conditioned flavor avoidance in rats. J. Nutr. 1999, 129:1737-1741.
27. Sclafani A., Zukerman S., Ackroff K. Fructose and glucose conditioned preferences in FVB mice: strain differences in post-oral sugar appetition. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 302:R1448-R1457.
28. Solberg D.H., Diamond J.M. Comparison of different dietary sugars as inducers of intestinal sugar transporters. Am. J. Physiol. 1987, 252:G574-G584.
29. Stratford J.M., Finger T.E. Central representation of postingestive chemosensory cues in mice that lack the ability to taste. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31:9101-9110.
30. Tolhurst G., Reimann F., Gribble F.M. Intestinal sensing of nutrients. Appetite Control, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology 2012, vol. 209:309-335. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
31. Treesukosol Y., Blonde G., Spector A.C. The T1r2 and T1r3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 296:R855-R865.
32. Wright E.M., Sala-Rabanal M., Loo D.D.F., Hirayama B.A. Sugar absorption. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract 2012, 1583-1593. Academic Press, Boston. L. Johnson (Ed.).
33. Zhang Y., Hoon M.A., Chandrashekar J., Mueller K.L., Cook B., Wu D., Zuker C.S., Ryba N.J.P. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell 2003, 112:293-301.
34. Zhao G.Q., Zhang Y., Hoon M.A., Chandrashekar J., Erlenbach I., Ryba N.J.P., Zuker C.S. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 2003, 115:255-266.
35. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning by glucose and fat in the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2011, 301:R1635-R1647.
36. Zukerman S., Ackroff K., Sclafani A. Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and non-metabolizable sugar analogs. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2013, 305:R840-R853.
37. Zukerman S., Glendinning J.I., Margolskee R.F., Sclafani A. T1r3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2009, 296:R866-R876.
38. Zukerman S., Glendinning J.I., Margolskee R.F., Sclafani A. Impact of deleting T1r3 or Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice. Chem. Senses 2013, 38:421-437.
39. Zukerman S., Touzani K., Margolskee R.F., Sclafani A. Role of olfaction in the conditioned sucrose preference of sweet-ageusic T1r3 knockout mice. Chem. Senses 2009, 34:685-694.