Effective dose of cone beam CT (CBCT) of the facial skeleton: A systematic review

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 88, Issue 1045, 2015, Pages

  Al Okshi, A ^a   Lindh, Christina ^a   Sale H ^a   Gunnarsson, M ^b   Rohlin, M ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DATA EXTRACTION; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MEDLINE; MODEL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EFFECTIVE DOSE; RADIATION RESPONSE; SAMPLE SIZE; SKELETON; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; WEB OF SCIENCE; FACIAL BONE; IMAGING PHANTOM; RADIOGRAPHY; STANDARDS;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FACIAL BONES; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE;

EID: 84919725300     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140658     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. European Commission. Radiation protection no. 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. A report prepared by the SEDENTEXCT project. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2011. [Cited 27 November 2014.] Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/radiation-protection/doc/publication/172.pdf
2. Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, Gahleitner A. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120443. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120443
3. Bushberg JT. Science, radiation protection, and the NCRP: building on the past, looking to the future. In: NCRP Fiftieth Annual Meeting Program; 10-11 March 2014; Bethesda, MD. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. pp. 5-7.
4. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8: 336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
5. Akers J, Aguiar-Ibáñez R, Baba-Akbari Sari A, Beynon S, Booth A, Burch J, et al. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Vol. III. York, UK: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination; 2009. pp. 294.
6. International Commission on Radiation Protection. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1-332.
7. International Commission on Radiological Protection. The 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP 1991; 21: 1-201.
8. Kim DS, Rashsuren O, Kim EK. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2014; 44: 21-9. doi: 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.21
9. Schilling R, Geibel MA. Assessment of the effective doses from two dental cone beam CT devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120273. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120273
10. Rottke D, Patzelt S, Poxleitner P, Schulze D. Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120417. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120417
11. Davies J, Johnson B, Drage N. Effective doses from cone beam CT investigation of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 41: 30-6. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30177908
12. Grünheid T, Kolbeck Schieck JR, Pliska BT, Ahmad M, Larson BE. Dosimetry of a conebeam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 436-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.10.024
13. Jeong DK, Lee SC, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, et al. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone-beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 65-70. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.2.65
14. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-71. doi: 10.1016/ j.ejrad.2010.11.028
15. Rampado O, Bianchi SD, Peruzzo Cornetto A, Rossetti V. Ropolo R. Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study. Phys Med 2014; 30: 18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.06.002
16. Sezgin ÖS, Kayipmaz S, Yasar D, Yilmaz AB, Ozturk MH. Comparative dosimetry of dental cone beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography, and multislice computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2012; 28: 32-7.
17. Librizzi ZT, Tadinada AS, Valiyaparambil JV, Lurie AG, Mallya SM. Cone-beam computed tomography to detect erosions of the temporomandibular joint: effect of field of view and voxel size on diagnostic efficacy and effective dose. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: e25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.03.012
18. Ludlow JB. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 115-22. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31708191
19. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, Strocchi S, Pozzi Taubert S, Leonardi A, et al. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. [In Italian.] Radiol Med 2010; 115: 600 - 11. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0520-5
20. Qu XM, Li G, Ludlow JB, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D conebeam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 770-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.013
21. Faccioli N, Barillari M, Guariglia S, Zivelonghi E, Rizzotti A, Cerini R, et al. Radiation dose saving through the use of cone-beam CT in hearing-impaired patients. Radiol Med 2009; 114: 1308-18. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0462-y
22. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 461-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002
23. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 35-40. doi: 10.1259/bjr/31419627
24. Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT. [In German.] Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008; 180: 396-401. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027142
25. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 106-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018
26. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 773-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.019
27. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-26.
28. Wörtche R, Hassfeld S, Lux CJ, Mussig E, Hensley FW, Krempien R, et al. Clinical application of cone beam digital volume tomography in children with cleft lip and palate. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 88-94.
29. Tsilakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 413-17.
30. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229-34.
31. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508-13.
32. Cohnen M, Kemper J, M öbes O, Pawelzik J, Mödder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 634-7.
33. Qu X, Li G, Sanderink G, Zhang ZY, Ma XC. Dose reduction of cone beam CT scanning for the entire oral and maxillofacial regions with thyroid collars. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 2012; 41: 373-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30200901
34. Qu X, Li G, Zhang Z, Ma X. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e376-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.048
35. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, et al. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 153-60. doi: 10.1259/bjr/19389412
36. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 268-73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/23424132
37. Silva MA, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Bumann A, Visser H, Hirsch E. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 640.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019
38. Okano T, Matsuo A, Gotoh K, Yokoi M, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, et al. Comparison of absorbed and effective dose from two dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. [In Japanese.] Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2012; 68: 216-25.
39. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-78. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/15779208
40. Ludlow JB, Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 802-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.07.013
41. Lukat TD, Wong JC, Lam EW. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20130082. doi: 10.1259/ dmfr.20130082
42. Vassileva J, Stoyanov D. Quality control and patient dosimetry in dental cone beam CT. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010; 139: 310-12. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq011
43. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Gröndahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 72-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/60375385
44. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 79-85. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/14769929
45. Al-Okshi A, Nilsson M, Petersson A, Wiese M, Lindh C. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120343. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120343
46. Al Najjar A, Colosi D, Dauer LT, Prins R, Patchell G, Branets I, et al. Comparison of adult and child radiation equivalent doses from 2 dental cone-beam computed tomography units. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 143: 784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.013
47. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Gröndahl K. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 483-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.018
48. International Atomic Energy Agency. Status of computed tomography dosimetry for wide cone beam scanners. IAEA human health reports no. 5. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2011.
49. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, Task Group III. Comprehensive methodology for the evaluation of radiation dose in X-ray computed tomography. AAPM report no. III . College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2010.
50. Bamba J, Araki K, Endo A, Okano T. Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42 : 20120445. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120445
51. Bornstein MM, Scarfe WC, Vaughn VM, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: a systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risk. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29: 55-77. doi: 10.11607/ jomi.2014suppl.g1.4
52. Lofthag-Hansen S. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments. Swed Dent J Suppl 2010: 4-55.
53. Shea B, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 10.
54. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2004; 328: 1490.