Comparative dosimetry of dental cone beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography, and multislice computed tomography

Oral Radiology

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 32-37

  Sezgin, Ömer Said ^a   Kayipmaz, Sadettin ^a   Yasar, Dogan ^b   Yilmaz, Ahmet Berhan ^c   Ozturk, Mehmet Halil ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Cekmece Nuclear Research and Training Center   (Turkey)

^c ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Cone beam CT; Panoramic radiography; Spiral CT; Thermoluminescent dosimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL RADIOLOGY; DOSIMETRY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETER; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY TUBE;

EID: 84857910270     PISSN: 09116028     EISSN: 16139674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-011-0078-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:461-8.
2. Chau ACM, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:559-65.
3. Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:244-50.
4. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:10-7. (Pubitemid 351211971)
5. Kayipmaz S, Sezgin OS, Saricaoglu ST, Bas O, Sahin B, Küçük M. The estimation of the volume of sheep mandibular defects using cone-beam computed tomography images and a stereological method. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:165-9.
6. Lee S, Gantes B, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 3. Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:208-12.
7. Isoda K, Ayukawa Y, Tsukiyama Y, Sogo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02203.x.
8. Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Hsu JT, Li YF, Wu YF. Effects of orthodontic tooth movement on alveolar bone density. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0552-9.
9. Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:246-55.
10. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:106-14.
11. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MGA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:268-73.
12. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthopos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:229-34. (Pubitemid 40288494)
13. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A, Helmrot E, Gröndahl K. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37:72-9.
14. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:35-40.
15. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and I-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:219-26. (Pubitemid 44076876)
16. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028.
17. Valentine J. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.
18. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1237-43.
19. Carrafiello G, Dizonno M, Colli V, Strocchi S, Pozzi Taubert S, Leonardi A, et al. Comparative study of jaws with multislice computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography. Radiol Med. 2010;115:600-11.
20. Koizumi H, Sur J, Seki K, Nakajima K, Sano T, Okano T. Effects of dose reduction on multi-detector computed tomographic images in evaluating the maxilla and mandible for pre-surgical implant planning: a cadaveric study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:830-4.