Effective dose span of ten different cone beam CT devices

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Rottke, D ^a,b   Patzelt, S ^b   Poxleitner, P ^b   Schulze, D ^a  

^a Dental Diagnostic Center   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dose range; Effective doses; Thermoluminescent dosimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CERVICAL SPINE; CHEEK; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE RANGE; EFFECTIVE DOSES; EQUIPMENT; ESOPHAGUS; HEAD; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; LENS; MANDIBLE; MESENCEPHALON; METHODOLOGY; ORBIT; PAROTID GLAND; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SKULL BASE; SUBLINGUAL GLAND; SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND; THERMOLUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY; THYROID GLAND;

CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE RANGE; EFFECTIVE DOSES; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY;

CALIBRATION; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CHEEK; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ESOPHAGUS; HEAD; HUMANS; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MANDIBLE; MESENCEPHALON; ORBIT; PAROTID GLAND; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PITUITARY GLAND; RADIATION DOSAGE; SKULL BASE; SUBLINGUAL GLAND; SUBMANDIBULAR GLAND; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY; THYROID GLAND;

EID: 84880893273     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120417     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Ludlow JB. A manufacturer's role in reducing the dose of cone beam computed tomography examinations: effect of beam filtration. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 115-122. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/31708191.
2. Morant JJ, Salvad'o M, Hern'andez-Gir'on I, Casanovas R, Ortega R, Calzado A. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012; 42: 92555893. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/92555893.
3. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028.
4. Bai M, Liu B, Mu H, Liu X, Jiang Y. The comparison of radiation dose between C-Arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): a phantom study. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 3577-3580. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.006.
5. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 35-40. doi: 10.1259/bjr/31419627.
6. Ludlow J. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-226. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/14340323.
7. Jeong D-K, Lee SC, Huh KH, Yi WJ, Heo MS, Lee SS, et al. Comparison of effective dose for imaging of mandible between multi-detector CT and cone beam CT. Imaging Sci Dent 2012; 42: 65-70. doi: 10.5624/isd.2012.42.2.65.
8. Koivisto J, Kiljunen T, Tapiovaara M, Wolff J, Kortesniemi M. Assessment of radiation exposure in dental cone-beam computerized tomography with the use of metal-oxide semiconductor fieldeffect transistor (MOSFET) dosimeters and Monte Carlo simulations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 114, 393-400.