In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 74, Issue , 2015, Pages 93-106

  Frauenberger, Christopher ^a   Good, Judith ^b   Fitzpatrick, Geraldine ^a   Iversen, Ole Sejer ^c  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Accountability; Participatory design; Reflective design; Rigour

Indexed keywords

AVAILABILITY;

ACCOUNTABILITY; ACTION RESEARCH; CRITICAL ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; REFLECTIVE DESIGNS; REFLECTIVE PRACTICES; RIGOUR;

DESIGN;

EID: 84918811011     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. S.R. Arnstein A ladder of citizen participation J. Am. Inst. Plan. 35 4 1969 216 224
2. Balka, E.; 2006. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design. PDC 06, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 134-143.
3. Bardzell, J.; Bardzell, S.; Stolterman, E.; 2014. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1951-1960. URL: http://dx.doi.acm.org/10.1145/2556288.2557137.
4. G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge 1987 Avebury Aldershot
5. Bødker, S.; Ehn, P.; Kammersgaard, J.; Kyng, M.; Sundblad, Y.; 1987. A UTOPIAN experience: on design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers. Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, Aldershot, pp. 251-278.
6. Bødker, S.; Ehn, P.; Knudsen, J.; Kyng, M.; Madsen, K.; 1988. Computer support for cooperative design (invited paper). In: Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work. CSCW 88. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 377-394.
7. Bødker, S.; Iversen, O.S.; 2002. Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement. In: Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. NordiCHI 02. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11-18.
8. Bossen, C.; Dindler, C.; Iversen, O.S.; 2010. User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC 10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 141-150.
9. Bossen, C.; Dindler, C.; Iversen, O.S.; 2012. Impediments to user gains: experiences from a critical participatory design project. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC 12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 31-40.
10. Bratteteig, T.; Wagner, I.; 2012. Disentangling power and decision-making in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC 12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 41-50.
11. A. Clement, and P. Besselaar A retrospective look at PD projects Commun. ACM 36 6 1993 29 37
12. N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing design discipline versus design science Des. Issues 17 3 2001 49 55
13. A. Druin The role of children in the design of new technology Behav. Inf. Technol. 21 1 2002 1 25 URL: http://hcil.cs.umd.edu/trs/99-23/99-23.html
14. P. Ehn Work-oriented Design of Computer Artifacts 2nd ed. 1989 Arbetslivscentrum Stockholm, Sweden
15. D. Fallman, and E. Stolterman Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research Digit. Creat. 21 4 2010 265 272
16. Foth, M.; Axup, J.; 2006. Participatory design and action research: identical twins or synergetic pair?. In: Jacucci, G.; Kensing, F.; Wagner, I.; Blomberg, J. (Eds.), Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design, August, pp. 93-96.
17. Frauenberger, C.; Good, J.; Alcorn, A.; Pain, H.; 2012a. Supporting the design contributions of children with autism spectrum conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. IDC12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 367-370 (ranked top 3 papers of IDC12). URL: http://dl.acm.org/authorize?6702809 .
18. C. Frauenberger, J. Good, A. Alcorn, and H. Pain Conversing through and about technologies design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 1 May (2) 2013 38 49
19. Frauenberger, C.; Good, J.; Keay-Bright, W.E.; 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, November, pp. 187-190.
20. C. Frauenberger, J. Good, and W.E. Keay-Bright Designing technology for children with special needs - bridging perspectives through participatory design CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts 7 March (1) 2011 1 28
21. Frauenberger, C.; Good, J.; Keay-Bright, W.E.; Pain, H.; 2012b. Interpreting input from children: a designerly approach. In: Bødker, S.; Olsen, D. (Eds.), CHI 12: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, May 4-10, pp. 2377-2386.
22. B. Friedman Value-sensitive design Interactions 3 December 1996 16 23
23. B. Friedman, P.H. Kahn-Jr.; and A. Borning Value sensitive design and information systems Himma Kenneth-Einar, H.T. Tavani, The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, 69-101 2008 Wiley & Sons Hoboken NJ, USA
24. Galliers, J.; Wilson, S.; Roper, A.; Cocks, N.; Marshall, J.; Muscroft, S.; Pring, T.; 2012. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC 12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 51-60.
25. Garde, J.A.; van der Voort, M.C.; 2012. Participants interpretations of PD workshop results. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases. PDC 12, vol. 2. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 5-8.
26. J. Gärtner, and I. Wagner Mapping actors and agendas political frameworks of systems design and participation Hum.-Comput. Interact. 11 September (3) 1996 187 214
27. Gaver, W.; 2012. What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 937-946. URL: http://dx.doi.acm.org/10.1145/2208516.2208538.
28. Gidlund, K.L.; 2012. Designing for all and no one - practitioners understandings of citizen driven development of public e-services. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC 12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11-19.
29. J. Good, and J. Robertson CARSS a framework for learner-centred design with children Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 16 4 2006 381 413 URL: http://iospress.metapress.com/index/ECGE8W1BLA92DELW.pdf
30. D.J. Greenwood, and M. Levin Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change 2nd ed. 2007 Sage Publications, Inc London, UK
31. J. Gregory Scandinavian approaches to participatory design Int. J. Eng. Educ. 19 1 2003 62 74
32. Grönvall, E.; Kyng, M.; 2012. On participatory design of home-based healthcare. Cogn. Technol. Work (April 23).
33. E. Guba Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 29 2 1981 75 91
34. E.G. Guba, and Y.S. Lincoln Competing paradigms in qualitative research N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln, Handbook of Qualitative Research 6 1994 Sage Publications, Inc. London, UK 105 117
35. J. Halloran, E. Hornecker, M. Stringer, E. Harris, and G. Fitzpatrick The value of values resourcing co-design of ubiquitous computing CoDesign 5 4 2009 245 273
36. S. Harrison, P. Sengers, and D. Tatar Making epistemological trouble third-paradigm HCI as successor science Interact. Comput. 23 2011 385 392
37. G.R. Hayes The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 18 August 2011 15:1-15:20
38. Irestig, M.; Eriksson, H.; Timpka, T.; 2004. The impact of participation in information system design: a comparison of contextual placements. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 102-111.
39. Iversen, O.S.; Halskov, K.; Leong, T.W.; 2010. Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC 10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 91-100.
40. O.S. Iversen, K. Halskov, and T.W. Leong Values-led participatory design CoDesign 8 2-3 2012 87 103
41. Kensing, F.; 2003. Methods and Practices in Participatory Design (Ph.D. thesis). The ITU University of Copenhagen.
42. S. Kujala User involvement a review of the benefits and challenges Behav. Inf. Technol. 22 1 2003 1 16
43. M. Kyng Bridging the gap between politics and techniques on the next practices of participatory design Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 22 1 2010 URL: http://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol22/iss1/5
44. Light, A.; 2010. The unit of analysis in understanding the politics of participatory practice. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference. PDC 10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 183-186.
45. Light, A.; Akama, Y.; 2012. The human touch: participatory practice and the role of facilitation in designing with communities. In: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers. PDC 12, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 61-70.
46. Jonas Löwgren, and Erik Stolterman Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology Paperback edition 2007 MIT Press Cambridge MA, USA
47. Merkel, C.B.; Xiao, L.; Farooq, U.; Ganoe, C.H.; Lee, R.; Carroll, J.M.; Rosson, M.B.; 2004. Participatory design in community computing contexts: tales from the field. In: Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design: Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices. PDC 04, vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-10.
48. Murray, D.; Lesser, M.; 1999. Autism and computing. In: Proceedings of Autism99 Online Conference organised by the NAS with the Shirley Foundation.
49. OConnor, C.; Fitzpatrick, G.; Buchannan-Dick, M.; McKeown, J.; 2006. Exploratory prototypes for video: interpreting PD for a complexly disabled participant. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. NordiCHI 06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 232-241.
50. J.S. Olson, and W.A. Kellogg Ways of Knowing in HCI 2014 Springer New York, NY URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8
51. K. Porayska-Pomsta, C. Frauenberger, H. Pain, G. Rajendran, T. Smith, R. Menzies, M. Foster, A. Alcorn, S. Wass, S. Bernadini, K. Avramides, W. Keay-Bright, J. Chen, A. Waller, K. Guldberg, J. Good, and O. Lemon Developing technology for autism an interdisciplinary approach Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 16 2 2011 117 127
52. SCERTS ® Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brookes Publishing Company, Baltimore, MD, USA.
53. H. Rittel, and M. Webber Dilemmas in a general theory of planning Policy Sci. 4 2 1973 155 169
54. Sanders, E.; Westerlund, B.; 2011. Experiencing, exploring and experimenting in and with co-design spaces. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Design Research Conference, May 29-31.
55. D.A. Schön The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action 1983 Basic Books New York
56. A. Sellen, Y. Rogers, R. Harper, and T. Rodden Reflecting human values in the digital age Commun. ACM 52 March 2009 58 66
57. Phoebe Sengers, Boehner Kirsten, David Shay, and Joseph 'jofish Kaye "Reflective Design." In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility 49-58 2005 ACM Press New York, NY, USA
58. A. Shenton Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects Educ. Inf. 22 2 2004 63 76
59. E. Stolterman The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research Int. J. Des. 2 1 2008 URL: http://www.ijdesign.org/ojs/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/240
60. van Rijn, H.; Stappers, P.J.; 2008. Expressions of ownership: motivating users in a co-design process. In: Proceedings Participatory Design Conference, pp. 36-39.
61. Vines, J.; Clarke, R.; Wright, P.; Iversen, O.S.; Leong, T.W.; McCarthy, J.; Olivier, P.; 2013. Summary Report on CHI 2012 Invited SIG: Participation and HCI: Why Involve People in Design? URL: http://di.ncl.ac.uk/participation/activities/chi2012/ .
62. Wolf, T.V.; Rode, J.A.; Sussman, J.; Kellogg, W.A.; 2006. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 06. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 521-530.
63. Zimmerman, J.; Forlizzi, J.; Evenson, S.; 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: CHI 07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 493-502.
64. Zimmerman, J.; Stolterman, E.; Forlizzi, J.; 2010. An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach. In: DIS 10: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 310-319.