Proteome-wide analysis of SUMO2 targets in response to pathological DNA replication stress in human cells

DNA Repair

Volumn 25, Issue , 2015, Pages 84-96

  Bursomanno, Sara ^a   Beli, Petra ^a,b   Khan, Asif M ^c   Minocherhomji, Sheroy ^a   Wagner, Sebastian A ^a   Bekker Jensen, Simon ^a   Mailand, Niels ^a   Choudhary, Chunaram ^a   Hickson, Ian D ^a,c   Liu, Ying ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY IMB   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Common fragile sites; DNA replication stress; Mass spectrometry; POLD3; SUMOylation

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME; SUMO 2 PROTEIN; DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE GAMMA; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITOR; POLD3 PROTEIN, HUMAN; REPLICATION FACTOR A; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; SUMO PROTEIN; SUMO2 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; CELL STRESS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA METABOLISM; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PROTEOMICS; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; SUMOYLATION; YEAST; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL CULTURE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITE; DNA REPAIR; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOME FRAGILE SITES; DNA; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; HUMANS; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; PROTEOMICS; REPLICATION PROTEIN A; S PHASE; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; SUMOYLATION;

EID: 84917705873     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: 15687856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Hay R.T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell 2005, 18:1-12.
2. Guo D., Li M., Zhang Y., Yang P., Eckenrode S., Hopkins D., Zheng W., Purohit S., Podolsky R.H., Muir A., Wang J., Dong Z., Brusko T., Atkinson M., Pozzilli P., Zeidler A., Raffel L.J., Jacob C.O., Park Y., Serrano-Rios M., Larrad M.T., Zhang Z., Garchon H.J., Bach J.F., Rotter J.I., She J.X., Wang C.Y. A functional variant of SUMO4, a new I kappa B alpha modifier, is associated with type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36:837-841.
3. Melchior F. SUMO - nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2000, 16:591-626.
4. Saitoh H., Hinchey J. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitin-related protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:6252-6258.
5. Vertegaal A.C., Andersen J.S., Ogg S.C., Hay R.T., Mann M., Lamond A.I. Distinct and overlapping sets of SUMO-1 and SUMO-2 target proteins revealed by quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5:2298-2310.
6. Zhao Y., Kwon S.W., Anselmo A., Kaur K., White M.A. Broad spectrum identification of cellular small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrate proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:20999-21002.
7. Rosas-Acosta G., Russell W.K., Deyrieux A., Russell D.H., Wilson V.G. A universal strategy for proteomic studies of SUMO and other ubiquitin-like modifiers. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2005, 4:56-72.
8. Ayaydin F., Dasso M. Distinct in vivo dynamics of vertebrate SUMO paralogues. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:5208-5218.
9. Tatham M.H., Jaffray E., Vaughan O.A., Desterro J.M., Botting C.H., Naismith J.H., Hay R.T. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:35368-35374.
10. Bylebyl G.R., Belichenko I., Johnson E.S. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:44113-44120.
11. Cheng C.H., Lo Y.H., Liang S.S., Ti S.C., Lin F.M., Yeh C.H., Huang H.Y., Wang T.F. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:2067-2081.
12. Schwartz D.C., Felberbaum R., Hochstrasser M. The Ulp2 SUMO protease is required for cell division following termination of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27:6948-6961.
13. Helmrich A., Ballarino M., Tora L. Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes. Mol. Cell 2011, 44:966-977.
14. Durkin S.G., Glover T.W. Chromosome fragile sites. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2007, 41:169-192.
15. Glover T.W., Berger C., Coyle J., Echo B. DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes. Hum. Genet. 1984, 67:136-142.
16. Tsantoulis P.K., Kotsinas A., Sfikakis P.P., Evangelou K., Sideridou M., Levy B., Mo L., Kittas C., Wu X.R., Papavassiliou A.G., Gorgoulis V.G. Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study. Oncogene 2008, 27:3256-3264.
17. Debatisse M., Le Tallec B., Letessier A., Dutrillaux B., Brison O. Common fragile sites: mechanisms of instability revisited. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:22-32.
18. Minocherhomji S., Hickson I.D. Structure-specific endonucleases: guardians of fragile site stability. Trends Cell Biol. 2014, 24:321-327.
19. Tanaka K., Nishide J., Okazaki K., Kato H., Niwa O., Nakagawa T., Matsuda H., Kawamukai M., Murakami Y. Characterization of a fission yeast SUMO-1 homologue, pmt3p, required for multiple nuclear events, including the control of telomere length and chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell Biol. 1999, 19:8660-8672.
20. Skilton A., Ho J.C., Mercer B., Outwin E., Watts F.Z. SUMO chain formation is required for response to replication arrest in S. pombe. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e6750.
21. Cremona C.A., Sarangi P., Yang Y., Hang L.E., Rahman S., Zhao X. Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol. Cell 2012, 45:422-432.
22. Psakhye I., Jentsch S. Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 2012, 151:807-820.
23. Eladad S., Ye T.Z., Hu P., Leversha M., Beresten S., Matunis M.J., Ellis N.A. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14:1351-1365.
24. Ouyang K.J., Woo L.L., Zhu J., Huo D., Matunis M.J., Ellis N.A. SUMO modification regulates BLM and RAD51 interaction at damaged replication forks. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000252.
25. Galanty Y., Belotserkovskaya R., Coates J., Polo S., Miller K.M., Jackson S.P. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2009, 462:935-939.
26. Morris J.R., Boutell C., Keppler M., Densham R., Weekes D., Alamshah A., Butler L., Galanty Y., Pangon L., Kiuchi T., Ng T., Solomon E. The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 2009, 462:886-890.
27. Hardeland U., Steinacher R., Jiricny J., Schar P. Modification of the human thymine-DNA glycosylase by ubiquitin-like proteins facilitates enzymatic turnover. EMBO J. 2002, 21:1456-1464.
28. Ong S.E., Blagoev B., Kratchmarova I., Kristensen D.B., Steen H., Pandey A., Mann M. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1:376-386.
29. Michalski A., Damoc E., Hauschild J.P., Lange O., Wieghaus A., Makarov A., Nagaraj N., Cox J., Mann M., Horning S. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q Exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. M111.011015.
30. Cox J., Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26:1367-1372.
31. Cox J., Neuhauser N., Michalski A., Scheltema R.A., Olsen J.V., Mann M. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10:1794-1805.
32. Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:44-57.
33. Engstrom K.G., Ohlsson L. Morphology and filterability of red blood cells in neonatal and adult rats. Pediatr. Res. 1990, 27:220-226.
34. Saito R., Smoot M.E., Ono K., Ruscheinski J., Wang P.L., Lotia S., Pico A.R., Bader G.D., Ideker T. A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:1069-1076.
35. Vizcaino J.A., Cote R.G., Csordas A., Dianes J.A., Fabregat A., Foster J.M., Griss J., Alpi E., Birim M., Contell J., O'Kelly G., Schoenegger A., Ovelleiro D., Perez-Riverol Y., Reisinger F., Rios D., Wang R., Hermjakob H. The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:D1063-D1069.
36. Chan K.L., Palmai-Pallag T., Ying S., Hickson I.D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:753-760.
37. Ying S., Minocherhomji S., Chan K.L., Palmai-Pallag T., Chu W.K., Wass T., Mankouri H.W., Liu Y., Hickson I.D. MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1001-1007.
38. Becker J., Barysch S.V., Karaca S., Dittner C., Hsiao H.H., Berriel Diaz M., Herzig S., Urlaub H., Melchior F. Detecting endogenous SUMO targets in mammalian cells and tissues. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:525-531.
39. Bruderer R., Tatham M.H., Plechanovova A., Matic I., Garg A.K., Hay R.T. Purification and identification of endogenous polySUMO conjugates. EMBO Rep. 2011, 12:142-148.
40. Golebiowski F., Matic I., Tatham M.H., Cole C., Yin Y., Nakamura A., Cox J., Barton G.J., Mann M., Hay R.T. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2:ra24.
41. Matic I., Schimmel J., Hendriks I.A., van Santen M.A., van de Rijke F., van Dam H., Gnad F., Mann M., Vertegaal A.C. Site-specific identification of SUMO-2 targets in cells reveals an inverted SUMOylation motif and a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:641-652.
42. Schimmel J., Eifler K., Sigurethsson J.O., Cuijpers S.A., Hendriks I.A., Verlaan-de Vries M., Kelstrup C.D., Francavilla C., Medema R.H., Olsen J.V., Vertegaal A.C. Uncovering SUMOylation dynamics during cell-cycle progression reveals FoxM1 as a key mitotic SUMO target protein. Mol. Cell 2014, 53:1053-1066.
43. Schimmel J., Larsen K.M., Matic I., van Hagen M., Cox J., Mann M., Andersen J.S., Vertegaal A.C. The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a key component of the SUMO-2/3 cycle. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:2107-2122.
44. Tammsalu T., Matic I., Jaffray E.G., Ibrahim A.F., Tatham M.H., Hay R.T. Proteome-wide identification of SUMO2 modification sites. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7:rs2.
45. Costantino L., Sotiriou S.K., Rantala J.K., Magin S., Mladenov E., Helleday T., Haber J.E., Iliakis G., Kallioniemi O.P., Halazonetis T.D. Break-induced replication repair of damaged forks induces genomic duplications in human cells. Science 2014, 343:88-91.
46. Burrell R.A., McClelland S.E., Endesfelder D., Groth P., Weller M.C., Shaikh N., Domingo E., Kanu N., Dewhurst S.M., Gronroos E., Chew S.K., Rowan A.J., Schenk A., Sheffer M., Howell M., Kschischo M., Behrens A., Helleday T., Bartek J., Tomlinson I.P., Swanton C. Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability. Nature 2013, 494:492-496.
47. Harrigan J.A., Belotserkovskaya R., Coates J., Dimitrova D.S., Polo S.E., Bradshaw C.R., Fraser P., Jackson S.P. Replication stress induces 53BP1-containing OPT domains in G1 cells. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193:97-108.
48. Lopez-Contreras A.J., Ruppen I., Nieto-Soler M., Murga M., Rodriguez-Acebes S., Remeseiro S., Rodrigo-Perez S., Rojas A.M., Mendez J., Munoz J., Fernandez-Capetillo O. A proteomic characterization of factors enriched at nascent DNA molecules. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:1105-1116.
49. Vertegaal A.C., Ogg S.C., Jaffray E., Rodriguez M.S., Hay R.T., Andersen J.S., Mann M., Lamond A.I. A proteomic study of SUMO-2 target proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:33791-33798.
50. Blomster H.A., Hietakangas V., Wu J., Kouvonen P., Hautaniemi S., Sistonen L. Novel proteomics strategy brings insight into the prevalence of SUMO-2 target sites. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2009, 8:1382-1390.
51. Tatham M.H., Matic I., Mann M., Hay R.T. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Sci. Signal. 2011, 4:rs4.
52. Llorente B., Smith C.E., Symington L.S. Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:859-864.
53. Lydeard J.R., Jain S., Yamaguchi M., Haber J.E. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 2007, 448:820-823.
54. Pohler J.R., Otterlei M., Warbrick E. An in vivo analysis of the localisation and interactions of human p66 DNA polymerase delta subunit. BMC Mol. Biol. 2005, 6:17.
55. Chea J., Zhang S., Zhao H., Zhang Z., Lee E.Y., Darzynkiewicz Z., Lee M.Y. Spatiotemporal recruitment of human DNA polymerase delta to sites of UV damage. Cell Cycle 2012, 11:2885-2895.
56. Lemmens L., Urbach S., Prudent R., Cochet C., Baldacci G., Hughes P. Phosphorylation of the C subunit (p66) of human DNA polymerase delta. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 367:264-270.
57. Liu G., Warbrick E. The p66 and p12 subunits of DNA polymerase delta are modified by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 349:360-366.
58. Baba D., Maita N., Jee J.G., Uchimura Y., Saitoh H., Sugasawa K., Hanaoka F., Tochio H., Hiroaki H., Shirakawa M. Crystal structure of thymine DNA glycosylase conjugated to SUMO-1. Nature 2005, 435:979-982.
59. Steinacher R., Schar P. Functionality of human thymine DNA glycosylase requires SUMO-regulated changes in protein conformation. Curr. Biol. 2005, 15:616-623.
60. Cortazar D., Kunz C., Selfridge J., Lettieri T., Saito Y., MacDougall E., Wirz A., Schuermann D., Jacobs A.L., Siegrist F., Steinacher R., Jiricny J., Bird A., Schar P. Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability. Nature 2011, 470:419-423.