The Asia-Europe Meeting: The Theory and Practice of Interregionalism

The Asia-Europe Meeting: The Theory and Practice of Interregionalism

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-203

  Robles, Alfredo C ^a  

^a DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84917140794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203933268     Document Type: Book

References (440)

1. Acharya, A. (1998) “Collective identity and conflict management in Southeast Asia,” in E. Adler and M. Barnett (eds) Security Communities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Acharya, A. (2003) “Regional institutions and Asian security order,” in M. Alagappa (ed.) Asian Security Order. Institutional and Normative Features, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
3. Adam, R. (1993) Attività Normative e di Controllo dell’OIL e Evoluzione della Comunità Internazionale, Milano: Dott. A. Giuffè Editore.
4. Agcaoili, L. (2004) “EU puts on hold free-trade deal with ASEAN bloc,” ABS–CBN News, 14 September Available online at: www.bilaterals.org/articleprint.php3?id_article=630 (accessed 5 March 2007).
5. Ahnlid, A. (1996) “Comparing GATT and GATS: regime creation under and after hegemony,” Review of International Political Economy, 3: 65–94.
6. Albala, N. (1998) “Un verrou juridique contre les Etats? Les dangers de l’Accord multilatéral sur l’investissement,” Le Monde Diplomatique, 528: 4–5.
7. Algieri, F. (2002) “EU economic relations with China: an institutionalist perspective,” in R. L. Edmonds (ed.) China and Europe Since 1978: A European Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Arnason, J. P. (1991) “Modernity as project and as field of tensions,” in A. Honneth and H. Joas (eds) Communicative Action. Essays on Jürgen Habermas’s “The Theory of Communicative Action,” trans. J. Gaines and D. L. Jones, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9. Ashley, R. (1986) “The poverty of neorealism,” in R. O. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 1 (1996) Chairman’s Statement, Paris, 14–15 October.
11. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 2 (1997) Chairman’s Statement, Bangkok, 13–14 November.
12. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 3 (1998) Report to Summit Leaders by Sir Martin Laing, Chairman of the British Overseas Trade Board, London, 3 April.
13. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 4 (1999) Chairman’s Statement, Seoul, 29 September to 1 October.
14. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 5 (2000) Chairman’s Statement, Vienna, 28–30 September.
15. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 6 (2001) Chairman’s Statement, Singapore, 9 October.
16. Asia–Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 7 (2002) Chairman’s Statement, Copenhagen, 18–20 September.
17. Asia–Europe Cooperation Framework (AECF), Seoul, 21 October 2000.
18. Asia–Europe Foundation (2002) The Fourth Informal ASEM Seminar on Human Rights, Singapore: Asia–Europe Foundation.
19. Asia–Europe Foundation (2005) “Intellectual Exchange, People To People Exchange, Cultural Exchange,” Singapore: Asia–Europe Foundation. Available online at: www.asef.org/# (accessed 20 October 2007).
20. Asia–Europe Foundation, Casa Asia, International Institute of Asian Studies, Japan Centre for International Exchange (2004) The Barcelona Report: Recommendations from Civil Society on Asia-Europe Relations addressed to the ASEM Leaders; Connecting Civil Society from Asia and Europe. An informal consultation, 16–18 June 2004 Barcelona, Spain, Singapore: Asia–Europe Foundation.
21. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 1 (1996) Chairman’s Statement, Bangkok, 2 March.
22. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 2 (1998a) Chairman’s Statement, London, 4 April.
23. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 2 (1998b) The Financial and Economic Situation in Asia, London, 3 April.
24. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 3 (2000) Chairman’s Statement, Seoul, 21 October.
25. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 4 (2002a) Chairman’s Statement, Copenhagen, 22–24 September.
26. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 4 (2002b) Cooperation Program on Fighting International Terrorism, Copenhagen, 22–24 September.
27. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 4 (2002c) Declaration on Cooperation against International Terrorism, Copenhagen, 22–24 September.
28. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 5 (2004a) Chairman’s Statement, Hanoi, 9 October.
29. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 5 (2004b) ASEM Declaration on Dialogue among Cultures and Civilizations, Hanoi, 9 October.
30. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 6 (2006a) Chairman’s Statement of the Sixth Asia-Europe Meeting, Helsinki, 10–11 September.
31. Asia–Europe Meeting (ASEM) 6 (2006b) Helsinki Declaration on the Future of ASEM, Helsinki, 10–11 September.
32. ASEM Conference on Cultures and Civilizations 1 (2003) Chairman’s Statement, Beijing, 4 December.
33. ASEM Conference on Cultures and Civilizations 2 (2005) Chairman’s Statement, Paris, 7–8 June.
34. ASEM Seminar on Anti-Terrorism (2003) Chair’s Summary, Beijing, 22–23 September.
35. ASEM Task Force for Closer Economic Partnership between Asia and Europe (2004) Final Report and Recommendations Presented to the ASEM V Summit in Hanoi, October 8–9 2004.
36. ASEM Trade Union Conference (2002) Statement of the ASEM Trade Union Conference to the Prime Minister of Denmark, Host of the ASEM IV Summit, Copenhagen, 22–4 September 2002, Copenhagen, 19–21 September.
37. ASEM Trust Fund, 020611, n.d. Indonesia: Monitoring Regional Implementation of Structural Reforms and Deregulation Programme, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
38. ASEM Trust Fund 022671, n.d. Indonesia: Water Utility (PDAM) Rescue Program, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
39. ASEM Trust Fund 022672, n.d. Indonesia: Water Utility (PDAM) Rescue Program, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
40. ASEM Trust Fund 023513, n.d. Philippine Out-of-School Children and Youth Development (POSCYD) Project, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
41. ASEM Trust Fund 023514, n.d. Philippine Out-of-School Children and Youth Development (POSCYD) Project, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
42. ASEM Trust Fund (2005a) ASEM Trust Fund 2: Status and Challenges. Annual Review. April 18, 2005, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
43. ASEM Trust Fund (2005b) Asia-Europe Meeting Trust Fund 2 Progress Report: October 28, 2005, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
44. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 1, (1996) Asia-Europe NGO Network: An Impulse for the 21st Century, Bangkok, 27–8 February.
45. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 2 (1998a) “Action, not gimmicks: Asia-Europe People’s Forum rejects proposed Trust Fund,” ASEM Watch, 32.
46. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 2 (1998b) A People’s Vision Towards a More Just, Equal and Sustainable World, London, 31 March–1 April.
47. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 2 (1998c) “Civil society groups demand a real say in ASEM,” ASEM Watch, 33.
48. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 3 (2000) People’s Vision 2000: Towards a Just, Equal and Sustainable World, Seoul, 17–21 October.
49. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 4 (2002) Human Rights, People’s Security, and Sustainable Development under Attack: No to Militarisation and Free Trade, Copenhagen, 19–22 September.
50. Asia–Europe People’s Forum (AEPF) 5 (2004) People’s Actions for Human Security in Asia and Europe, Hanoi, 6–9 September.
51. Asia–Europe Vision Group (AEVG) (1999) For a Better Tomorrow: Asia-Europe Partnership in the 21st Century.
52. Asia–Europe Young Leaders’ Symposium [AEYLS] (1997a) Opening Ceremony and Keynote Addresses, Miyazaki, Japan, 10 March.
53. Asia–Europe Young Leaders’ Symposium [AEYLS] (1997b) Provisional Summary of the Brainstorming Session on Economics, Miyazaki, Japan, 11 March.
54. Asia–Europe Young Leaders’ Symposium [AEYLS] (1997c) Workshop IV: Interregional Cooperation; Identifying Modalities for Cooperation among Sovereign States on an Intra- and Interregional Basis, Miyazaki, Japan, 11 March.
55. Association of Southeast Asian Nations–EC Ministerial Meeting 1 (1978) Joint Declaration, Brussels, 21 November.
56. Association of Southeast Asian Nations–EU Eminent Persons Group (1996) “A strategy for a new partnership. Report of the ASEAN–European Union Eminent Persons Group,” World Bulletin, 12: 70–105.
57. ASEAN–EU Vision Group (2006) Report of the ASEAN–EU Vision Group: Transregional Partnership for Shared and Sustainable Prosperity, Hanoi, Vietnam.
58. Association of Southeast Asian Nations Labour Ministers’ Meeting (1992) Communiqué of the 9th Meeting, Manila, 26–27 November.
59. Association of Southeast Asian Nations Labour Ministers’ Meeting (1994) Communiqué of the 10th Meeting, Singapore, 16–17 May.
60. Association of Southeast Asian Nations Labour Ministers’ Meeting (1996) Communiqué of the 11th Meeting, Bangkok, 25–2 April.
61. Baker, P. (2002) “Human rights, Europe and the People’s Republic of China,” in R. L. Edmonds (ed.) China and Europe since 1978: A European perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Bantekas, I. (2003) “The international law of terrorist financing,” American Journal of International Law, 97: 315–33.
63. Bello, W. (1998) “East Asia: on the eve of the great transformation?” Review of International Political Economy, 5: 424–44.
64. Benedetti, F. and Washburn, J. L. (1999) “Drafting the International Criminal Court Treaty: two years to Rome and an afterword on the Rome Diplomatic Conference,” Global Governance, 5: 1–39.
65. Bergé, B. (2002) “ASEM and social policies: looking back, looking ahead,” in K. Fritsche (ed.) Social Policies and the ASEM Process: International Workshop, Berlin March 4–5 (2002), Essen: Asien-Stiftung.
66. Bersick, S. (1998) ASEM: Eine neue Qualität der Kooperation zwischen Europa und Asien, Münster: Lit Verlag.
67. Bersick, S. (2004a) “ASEMployment: Asien, Europa und die Zukunft der Beschäftigung,” Asienhaus Rundbrief, 12: 2.
68. Bersick, S. (2004b) “The ASEM regime: structure, interests and processes,” paper presented at Philippine Forum on the ASEM: Understanding the Process and Potentials and Defining Civil Society Engagements, Pasig City, Philippines, November.
69. Bersick, S. (2004c) Auf dem Weg in eine neue Weltordnung? Zur Politik der interregionalen Beziehungen am Beispiel des ASEM-Prozesses, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
70. Bersick, S. (2004d) “China and ASEM: strengthening multilateralism through inter-regionalism,” in W. Stokhof, P. Van der Velde and Yeo Lay Hwee (eds) The Eurasian Space: Far More than Two Continents, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
71. Bevacqua, R. (1998) “Whither the Japanese model? The Asian economic crisis and the continuation of Cold War politics in the Pacific Rim,” Review of International Political Economy, 5: 410–23.
72. Bigo, D. (2000) “When the two become one: internal and external securitisations,” in M. Kelstrup and M. C. Williams (eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, London: Routledge.
73. Blackhurst, R., Enders, A. and Francois, J. F. (1996) “The Uruguay Round and market access: opportunities and challenges for developing countries,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Blecker, R. A. (1999) Taming Global Finance: A better architecture for growth and equity, Washington, DC: The Economic Policy Institute.
75. Bobrow, D. B. (1999) “The US and ASEM: why the hegemon didn’t bark,” The Pacific Review, 12: 103–28.
76. Boval, B. (1996) “L’Accord sur les droits de propriété intellectuelle qui touchent au commerce (ADPIC ou TRIPS),” in Société Française pour le Droit International, Colloque de Nice, La Réorganisation Mondiale des Echanges, Paris: Editions Pedone.
77. Bowles, P. (1999) “Regionalism and development after (?) the global financial crisis,” paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), University of Warwick, September.
78. Brittan, L. (1994) “Europe’s New Asia Strategy,” presented at the European Commission – Financial Times Interactive Forum “Towards a New European Economic Strategy for Asia,” Brussels, October.
79. Brittan, L. (1999) “Europe/Asia relations,” The Pacific Review, 12: 491–8.
80. Bronckers, M. and McNelis, N. (2001) “The EU Trade Barriers Regulation comes of age,” Journal of World Trade, 35: 427–82.
81. Brown, C. (1994) “‘Turtles all the way down’: anti-foundationalism, critical theory and international relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 23: 213–36.
82. Brown, D. K. (2000) International Trade and Core Labor Standards: A Survey of the Recent Literature, Department of Economics, Tufts University.
83. Buzan, B. (1995) “The level-of-analysis problem in international relations reconsidered,” in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds) International Relations Theory Today, University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
84. Cahin, G. (2000) “L’action internationale au Timor oriental,” Annuaire Français de Droit International, 46: 139–75.
85. Caillaux, D. (1997) “L’action internationale visant à lutter contre l’exploitation des enfants,” paper presented at the European Parliament, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy, Subcommittee on Human Rights, Public Hearing on the Social Clause. Human Rights Protection or Protectionism? Brussels, June.
86. Camroux, D. and Park Sunghee (2004) “Korea and ASEM,” in W. Stokhof, P. van der Velde and Yeo Lay Hwee (eds) The Eurasian Space: Far More than Two Continents, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
87. Cardwell, P. J. (2004) “The EU–Japan relationship: from mutual ignorance to meaningful partnership,” Journal of European Affairs, 2: 11–16.
88. Cassen, B. (1998) “Le bateau ivre de la finance,” Le Monde Diplomatique, 536: 6.
89. Cassen, B. (1999) “Vive la taxe Tobin!” Le Monde Diplomatique, 545: 14.
90. Cassese, A. (1991) “La valeur actuelle des droits de l’homme,” in Humanité et Droit International. Mélanges René-Jean Dupuy, Paris: Editions Pedone.
91. Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (2003) “The Cancun WTO Ministerial Meeting, September 2003: What happened? What does it mean for development?” Submission to the International Development Select Committee, September.
92. Chambers, S. (1995) “Discourse and democratic practices,” in S. K. White (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93. Chang Li Lin and Rajan, R. S. (1999) “Regional responses to the Southeast Asian financial crisis: a case of self-help or no help?” paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of the Centre for the Study of Globalisation and Regionalisation (CSGR), University of Warwick, September.
94. Chee Peng Lim (1980) “ASEAN–EEC external relations: cooperation in trade and investment,” in ASEAN External Economic Relations: Proceedings of the 5th Conference of ASEAN Economic Association, Singapore: Chopman Publishers.
95. Chua Min Hoong (1998a) “ASEM a success, says PM,” The Straits Times, 6 April.
96. Chua Min Hoong (1998b) “Fuzz and goodwill at ASEM2, but no panacea,” The Straits Times, 8 April.
97. Cochran, M. (2002) “A democratic critique of cosmopolitan democracy: pragmatism from the bottom up,” European Journal of International Relations, 8: 517–48.
98. Cohen, R. (1991) Negotiating Across Cultures: Communication Obstacles in International Diplomacy, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
99. Coloma, R. (1998) “ASEM to tackle trade, finance, environment and social issues,” Asian Financial Press, 3 April.
100. Conte-Helm, M. (1996) The Japanese and Europe: Economic and Cultural Encounters, London: The Athlone Press Ltd.
101. Cornwell, R. (1998) “No meat for Asian tigers limping West,” Independent on Sunday, 29 March.
102. Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation [CAEC] (1996) “Paris Plenary Meeting. Informal summary.”
103. Cox, R. W. (1983) “Gramsci, hegemony and international relations: an essay in method,” in R. W. Cox with T. J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
104. Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power and World Order, New York: Columbia University Press.
105. Cox, R. W. (1992) “Multilateralism and world order,” in R. W. Cox with T. J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Dallmayr, F. (2001) “Conversation across boundaries: political theory and global diversity,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30: 331–47.
107. Damodaran, R. (2006) “Decision on ASEAN–EU free trade pact in August,” Business Times (Kuala Lumpur), 16 March 2006. Available online at: www.bilaterals.org/-article-print.php3?id_article=4151 (accessed 5 March 2007).
108. Das, B. L. (1998) “Restoring balance to services in WTO,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], 4336.
109. Das, B. L. (2001) Chairman’s Text and Developing Countries, Penang: Third World Network.
110. Das, B. L. (2002) The New Work Programme of the WTO, Penang: Third World Network.
111. De Beer, J. (2002) “ASEM in crisis,” Europe Report, 25, 27 September. Available online at: www.glocom.org/special_tioucs/eu_report/20020927_eureport_s25 (accessed 17 August 2005).
112. Dent, C. M. (1997–8) “The ASEM: managing the new framework of the EU’s economic relations with East Asia,” Pacific Affairs, 70: 495–516.
113. Dent, C. M. (1999) The European Union and East Asia: An Economic Relationship, London: Routledge.
114. Dent, C. M. (2003) “From inter-regionalism to trans-regionalism: Challenges for ASEM,” Asia-Europe Journal, 1: 223–36.
115. De Paiva Abreu, M. (1996) “Trade in manufactures: the outcome of the Uruguay Round and developing countries,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. Dhommeaux, J. (1989) “De l’universalité du droit international des droits de l’homme,” Annuaire Français de Droit International, 35: 399–423.
117. Dosch, J. (1998) “Emerging multilateralization of security cooperation in the Asia–Pacific region – following European experiences and models or driven by an indigenous approach?” in J. Krause and F. Umbach (eds) Perspectives of Regional Security Cooperation in Asia–Pacific: Learning from Europe or Developing Indigenous Models? Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.
118. Dufour, S. (1995) “La libéralisation des echanges mondiaux et le respect des règles fondamentales en matière sociale: un lien controversé,” Études Internationales, 26: 275–89.
119. Drake, W. J. and Nicolaidis, K. (1992) “Ideas, interests and institutionalization: ‘trade in services’ and the Uruguay Round,” International Organization, 46: 37–100.
120. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 1 (1997) Chairman’s Statement, Makuhari, Japan, 27–28 September.
121. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 2 (1999) Chair’s Statement, Berlin, 8–9 October.
122. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 3 (2001) Chair’s Statement, Hanoi, 10–11 September.
123. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 4 (2002) Chair’s Statement, Copenhagen, 18–19 September.
124. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 5 (2003) Chair’s Statement, Dalian, China, 23–24 July.
125. Economic Ministers’ Meeting [EMM] 6 (2005) Chairman’s Statement, Tianjin, China, 26 June.
126. Edgren, G. (1979) “Fair labour standards and trade liberalisation,” International Labour Review, 118: 523–35.
127. Eichengreen, B. (1999) Toward a New International Financial Architecture. a practical post-Asia agenda, Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
128. Eschborn, N., Gardill, J., and Mols, M. (1992) “Die Beziehungen EG-Asien,” in F. Huscheler and O. Schmuck (eds) Die Süd-Politik der EG: Europas entwicklungspolitische Verantwortung in der veränderten Weltordnung, Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.
129. European Commission COM (1994) 314 final, Communication from the Commission to the Council: Towards a New Asia Strategy.
130. European Commission COM (1995) 279 final, Communication from the Commission to the Council: A Long-Term Policy for China–Europe Relations.
131. European Commission COM (1996) 53 final, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Global Challenge of International trade: A Market Access Strategy for the European Union.
132. European Commission COM (1996) 314 final, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee: Creating a New Dynamic in ASEAN-EU Relations.
133. European Commission COM (1998) 181 final, Communication from the Commission: Building a Comprehensive Partnership with China.
134. European Commission COM (1999) 0331, Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament. The EU Approach to the Millennium Round.
135. European Commission (1999a) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 29 October.
136. European Commission (1999b) EU Supplementary Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 25 October.
137. European Commission COM (2000) 241, Communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament: Perspectives and Priorities for the ASEM Process into the New Decade.
138. European Commission COM (2000) 552 final, Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Implementation of the Communication “Building a Comprehensive Partnership with China.”
139. European Commission (2000a) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 16 October.
140. European Commission (2000b) EU Supplementary Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 26 October.
141. European Commission (2001a) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 12 October.
142. European Commission (2001b) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 23 October.
143. European Commission (2001c) Vademecum: Modalities for Future ASEM Dialogue; Taking the Process Forward, 18 July.
144. European Commission COM (2001) 265 final, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: EU Strategy Towards China; Implementation of the 1998 Communication and Future Steps for a More Effective EU Policy.
145. European Commission COM (2001) 469 final, Communication from the Commission: Europe and Asia; A Strategic Framework for Enhanced Partnerships.
146. European Commission (2002a) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 17 October.
147. European Commission (2002b) EU Supplementary Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan. Updated Version, 18 December.
148. European Commission SEC (2002) 874, Commission Staff Working Paper: Fourth Asia–Europe Meeting in Copenhagen, September 22–24, 2002. ASEM4: Unity and Strength in Diversity.
149. European Commission (2003a) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 16 October.
150. European Commission (2003b) EU Supplementary Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 14 November.
151. European Commission COM (2003) 533, Commission Policy Paper for Transmission to the Council and the European Parliament: A Maturing Partnership – Shared Interests and Challenges in EU-China Relations (Updating the Commission’s Communications on EU–China Relations of 1998 and 2001).
152. European Commission (2004) EU Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in Japan, 28 October.
153. European Commission SEC (2006) 1230, Commission Staff Working Document: Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; Global Europe. Competing in the World. A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy {COM (2006) 567 FINAL}{sec (2006) 1228}{sec (2006) 1229}.
154. European Commission ASEM Counsellor (2001) Consolidated Version of Measures taken by ASEM Partners to Address the Consolidated and Prioritised List of the Major Generic Trade Barriers among ASEM Partners.
155. European Commission External Relations (2000) File Note: ASEM NGO Visit of the European Commission. Brussels, 5 June 2000.
156. European Commission (2006) ASEM 6, 10–11 September 2006, Helsinki: 10 Years of ASEM; Global Challenges, Joint Responses. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
157. European Institute of Asian Studies (2003) Consultative Seminar with Civil Society: Brussels, 17–18 November 2003, Brussels: European Institute for Asian Studies.
158. European Parliament (1993) The Economic Impact of Dumping and the Community’s Anti-Dumping Policy, Strasbourg: Directorate General for Research.
159. European Parliament PE2971377 Final A5–0076/2001 (1999) Report containing the European Parliament’s Recommendations to the Commission on the Negotiations Conducted within the WTO Framework on the Built-In Agenda [2028/2001 (INI)] Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy. Rapporteur: Konrad Schwaiger. 28 February.
160. European Union-Japan (1991) Joint Declaration on Relations between the European Community and Its Member States and Japan, The Hague, 18 July.
161. European Union-Japan Ministerial Meeting (2000) EU–Japan Joint Statement on the WTO, 11 January.
162. European Union-Japan Summit (2001) Shaping Our Common Future and Action Plan for EU-Japan Cooperation, Brussels.
163. “Europe ‘doing more now’ for Asia,” The Straits Times, 4 April 1998.
164. “Europe must match words with deeds,” The Nation (Bangkok), 6 April 1998.
165. Fédération Internationale des Ligues de Droits de l’Homme (FIDH) (2004) “Human rights must be at the core of the discussions!” September 6. Available online at: www.fidh.org/article_print.php3?id_article=1873 (accessed 17 August 2005).
166. Fédération Internationale des Ligues de Droits de l’Homme (FIDH) and Human Rights in China (2000) “Open letter to EU member states: The EU-China Human Rights Dialogue.” 27 September Available online at: www.fidh.org/article.php3?id_article=1112 (accessed 23 October 2004).
167. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 1 (1997) Chairman’s Statement, Bangkok, 19 September.
168. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 2 (1999) Chairman’s Statement, Frankfurt, 15–16 January.
169. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 3 (2001) Chairman’s Statement, Kobe, 13–14 January.
170. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 4 (2002) Chairman’s Statement, Copenhagen, 5–6 July.
171. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 5 (2003) Ministerial Statement, Bali, 5–6 July.
172. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 6 (2005) Chairman’s Statement, Tianjin, China, 26 June.
173. Finance Ministers Meeting [FinMM] 7 (2006) Chairman’s Statement, Vienna, 8–9 April.
174. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 1 (1997) Chairman’s Statement, Singapore, 13–14 February.
175. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 2 (1999) Chairman’s Statement, Frankfurt, 15 January.
176. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 3 (2001) Chairman’s Statement, Beijing, 24–25 May.
177. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 4 (2002) Chair’s Statement, Madrid, 6–7 June.
178. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 5 (2003) Chair’s Statement, Bali, July 22–24 July.
179. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 6 (2004) Chair’s Statement, Kildare, Ireland, 17–18 April.
180. Foreign Ministers’ Meeting [FMM] 7 (2005) Chairman’s Statement, Kyoto, 6–7 May.
181. Fitzgerald, V. (2000) “La seguridad en las finanzas internacionales,” in J. A. Alonso and C. Freres (eds) Los Organismos Multilaterales y la Ayuda al Desarrollo, Madrid: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional.
182. Fogarty, D. (2004) “Suu Kyi proves tricky topic for Asia-Europe summit,” Reuters, 12 October.
183. Fouquet, D. (2001) Whither the ASEM Process? A forum that needs more substance, Essen: Asienhaus.
184. Freeman, C. (1998) “The East Asian crisis, technical change and the world economy,” Review of International Political Economy, 5: 393–409.
185. Friends of the Earth International (1999) “Seattle and the WTO: A Briefing,” 13 December.
186. Fritsche, K. (2002) “Joint actions by non-governmental organizations and trade unions,” in K. Fritsche (ed.) Social Policies and the ASEM Process.: International workshop, Berlin (March 4–5, 2002), Essen: Asien-Stiftung.
187. Fritz, J. S. (1997) “[Review of] Andreas Hasenclever, Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26: 924–7.
188. “FTA with EU may cut Burma out,” The Nation (Bangkok), 9 March 2007. Available online at: www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=7087 (accessed 5 March 2007).
189. Germany, China, Ireland, Spain (2002) Concept paper on the future of employment and the quality of labour, Copenhagen, September.
190. Ghebali, V. Y. (1987) L’Organisation Internationale du Travail, Genève: Georg Editeur.
191. Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. Gilson, J. (2000) Japan and the European Union: A Partnership for the Twenty-First Century? Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
193. Gilson, J. (2001) “Europe in Japan: a growing EU identity,” in G. D. Hook and H. Hasegawa (eds) The Political Economy of Japanese Globalization, London: Routledge.
194. Gilson, J. (2002) Asia meets Europe: Inter-regionalism and the Asia–Europe Meeting, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Limited.
195. Godemont, F., Lehmann, J. P., Maull, H. and Segal, G. (1995) “An agenda for Euro–East Asian security,” Unpublished manuscript, October.
196. Godemont, F., Nicolas, F. and Yakushiji Taizo (2004) Asia and Europe: Cooperating on Energy Security. Summary, Council on Asia–Europe Cooperation Task Force 2003–04.
197. Goh Chok Tong (1994/95) “L’Asie et l’Europe: une nouvelle alliance pour le XXIe siècle,” Politique Etrangère, 59: 1099–1106.
198. Government of Japan (1998) Japan’s Requests and Comments Regarding EU Regulations and Access to EU Markets, 2 March.
199. Government of Japan (2000) Japan–EU High-Level Dialogue on Regulatory Reform, 1 November.
200. Government of Japan (2001a) Japan’s Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in the EU, January.
201. Government of Japan (2001b) Japan’s (Supplementary) Proposals for Regulatory Reform in the EU and Related Japanese Comments.
202. Government of Japan (2001c) Japan’s Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in the EU and Related Japanese Comments, 23 October.
203. Government of Japan (2003) Japan’s Priority Proposals for Regulatory Reform in the EU, 14 November.
204. Government of Japan (2004) Japan’s Proposal [sic] for Regulatory Reform Dialogue: Tentative List of Proposals, November.
205. Gross, M. (1988) “Entwicklung des europäischen wirtschaftlichen Engagements in ASEAN-Ländern,” in B. Dahm and W. Harbrecht (eds) ASEAN und EG: Partner, Probleme, Perspektiven, Hamburg: Deutsches Ubersee-Institut.
206. Group of 77 and China (2001) Declaration by the Group of 77 and China on the Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference at Doha, Qatar, Geneva, 22 October.
207. Guan Jinghe (2001) “Rights and obligations in the promotion of social welfare,” in H. Wirajuda and F. Delon (eds) The Fourth Informal Seminar on Human Rights, Bali, Indonesia, 12–13 July 2001, Singapore: Asia–Europe Foundation.
208. Haacke, J. (1996) “Theory and praxis in international relations: Habermas, self-reflection, rational argumentation.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 25: 255–89.
209. Habermas, J. (1976) “The public sphere,” in S. Seidman (ed.) (1989) Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader, Boston: Beacon Press.
210. Habermas, J. (1984) “Social action and rationality,” in S. Seidman (ed.) (1989) Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader, Boston: Beacon Press.
211. Habermas, J. (1987a) “The concept of the lifeworld and the hermeneutic idealism of interpretive sociology,” in S. Seidman (ed.) (1989) Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
212. Habermas, J. (1987b) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. II, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Boston: Beacon Press.
213. Habermas, J. (1992) “Further reflections on the public sphere,” in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
214. Habermas, J. (1998) The Inclusion of the other. Studies in political theory, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
215. Habermas, J. (2000) “Beyond the nation-state? On some consequences of economic globalization,” In E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union: Integration through Deliberation, London: Routledge.
216. Habermas, J. (2001) The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Cambridge: Polity Press.
217. Hadad, N. (2003) “Water resource policy in Indonesia: open doors for privatization,” Jubilee South, 12 December.
218. Haggard, S. and Simmons, B. A. (1987) “Theories of international regimes,” International Organization, 41: 491–517.
219. Hänggi, H. (2004) “ASEM’s security agenda revisited,” in W. Stokhof, P. van der Velde, and Yeo Lay Hwee (eds) The Eurasian Space: Far more than two continents, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
220. Hansen, S. (2000) ASEM-Gipfel in Seoul, Essen: Asienhaus Essen.
221. Haq, M. ul, Kaul, I. and Grunberg, I. (1996) The Tobin Tax: Coping with Financial Volatility, New York: Oxford University Press.
222. Hathaway, D. F. and Ingco, M. D. (1996) “Agricultural liberalization and the Uruguay Round,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
223. Hauser, H. (2002) “Die Ministererklärung von Doha: Start zu einer kleinen Marktöffnungsrunde oder zu einer umfassenden Entwicklungsrunde?” Aussenwirtschaft: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen, 57: 127–50.
224. Henkel, F., Heberg, M. and Schmit, F. (2004) For a Social Dimension in the Asian–European dialogue: Challenges before the 5th ASEM Summit Meeting in Hanoi, Hanoi: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
225. Hiemenz, U. (1987) “EG-ASEAN Wirtschaftsbeziehungen: Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts,” Internationales Asienforum, 18: 315–22.
226. Hiemenz, U., Agarwal, J. P., Gross, M., von Kirchbach, F. and Langhammer, R. J. (1987) The Competitive Strength of European, Japanese and US Suppliers on ASEAN Markets, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).
227. Higgott, R. (2000) “ASEM and the evolving global order,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed.) The Seoul (2000) Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia-Europe Partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
228. Hilpert, H. G. (1998) “Economic interactions,” in H. Maull, G. Segal and J. Wanandi (eds) Europe and the Asia Pacific, London: Routledge.
229. Hilpert, H. G. and Wacker, G. (2004) China und Japan: Kooperation und Rivalität, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.
230. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1991) “Beware of gurus: structure and action in international relations,” Review of International Studies, 17: 393–410.
231. Hook, G. D., Gilson, J., Hughes, C. W. and Dobson, H. (2001) Japan’s International Relations: Politics, Economics and Security, London: Routledge.
232. Hormeku, T. (1999) Dirty Tactics in Seattle, Penang: Third World Network.
233. Hormeku, T. (2001) “Invasion of WTO by ‘green men’,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5008.
234. Hua Xiaofeng (2003) Malaysia: ASEM Grant for Financial Sector Strengthening, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 18 March.
235. Human Rights Watch (2000) “Open letter to European Union foreign Ministers. Re: China-European Union human rights dialogue,” Brussels, 14 July Available online at: www.hrw.org/press/(2000)/07/China_EU0728.htm (accessed 23 October 2004).
236. Human Rights Watch (2002) “Letter to ASEM summit participant countries,” 13 September.
237. International Confederation of Free Trade Unions [ICFTU] (2004) Creating Social Partnership in ASEM: Background Document to ASEM Trade Union Forum, Hanoi, 24 April.
238. International Confederation of Free Trade Unions [ICFTU] (2006) Trade Union Summit: 10 Years of ASEM – Time to Deliver! Helsinki, 8 September.
239. International Confederation of Free Trade Unions [ICFTU] European Trade Union Federation and Asian and Pacific Regional Organisation of the ICFTU (2000) Charting a Social Direction to ASEM: Trade Union Statement to the Third Summit of the ASEM, Seoul 20–21 October 2000, Seoul, Korea, 15–16 October.
240. “If Asia suffers, so do we, says Kohl,” The Straits Times, 6 April 1998.
241. Iklé, F. C. (1964) How Nations Negotiate, New York: Harper and Row.
242. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1997) Summary Proceedings Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors 1997, Washington, DC: IMF.
243. Investment Experts Group (IEG) 1 (1998) Conclusions by the Chair, Evian, 23–24 November 1998.
244. Investment Experts Group (IEG) 2 (1999) Chairman’s Statement, Singapore, 11–12 February.
245. Investment Experts Group (IEG) 3 (1999) Co-Chairs’ Statement, Brussels, 5–6 July.
246. Investment Promotion Action Plan (IPAP) (1997) The Asia-Europe Investment Promotion Action Plan.
247. Investment Promotion Action Plan (IPAP) (1999) Most Effective Measures to Attract Direct Foreign Investment.
248. Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Economic Affairs Bureau (2002) Japan’s Basic Strategy for the WTO New Round Negotiations, 4 October.
249. Jenner, R. M. (2001) “Why civil society opposes a new round,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 4902.
250. Jin Nyum (2001) Strengthening the International Financial Architecture: Progress Assessment and Future Direction from the Perspective of an Emerging Market Country in Asia, presented at the ASEM Finance Ministers’ Meeting, Kobe, Japan, 14 January.
251. Johnston, A. I. (2004) “China’s international relations: the political and security dimensions,” in S. S. Kim (ed.) The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
252. Jomo, K. S. (1998) Tigers in Trouble: Financial Governance, Liberalisation and Crises in East Asia, London: Zed Books Ltd.
253. Juillard, P. (1996) “L’Accord sur les mesures concernant l’lnvestissement et liées au commerce,” in Société Française pour le Droit International, Colloque de Nice, La Réorganisation Mondiale des Echanges, Paris: Pedone.
254. Jung Ku-Hyun and Lehmann, J. P. (1997) “The economic and business dimension,” in Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation, The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia-Europe Cooperation: CAEC Task Force Reports, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
255. Kaiser, K. (2004) Asia and Europe: Necessity for Cooperation. Report on the findings of the Task Forces of the Council for Asia-Europe Cooperation (CAEC) 2003–04.
256. Kang Kyung-wha (2001) “Rights and obligations in the promotion of social welfare,” in H. Wirajuda and F. Delon (eds) The Fourth Informal Seminar on Human Rights, Bali, Indonesia, 12–13 July 2001, Singapore: Asia–Europe Foundation.
257. Kapoor, I. (2002) “Deliberative democracy and the WTO,” Review of International Political Economy, 11: 522–41.
258. Kent, A. (2002) “China’s international socialization: the role of international organizations,” Global Governance, 8: 343–64.
259. Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
260. Kesavapany, K. (1996) “An overview of recent developments in the WTO,” in Chia Siow Yue and J. L. H. Tan (eds) ASEAN in the WTO: Challenges and responses, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
261. Khor, M. (2000) Globalization and the South: Some Critical Issues, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Division on Globalization and Development Strategies, March.
262. Khor, M. (2001a) “Doha meet kicks off to ‘democratic’ start,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5008.
263. Khor, M. (2001b) Draft Doha Declaration Sseeks to Launch Big New Round, Ignores Ccivil Society Demands: Comment on the WTO Draft Ministerial Declaration, Penang: Third World Network.
264. Khor, M. (2001c) “Majority of developing countries reject text on new issues,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5008.
265. Khor, M. (2003a) “EC and Japan prepare new draft texts on Singapore issues for Cancun,” Penang: Third World Network. Available online at: www.twnside.org.sg/title/twe310c.htm (accessed 18 August 2004).
266. Khor, M. (2003b) “Cancun draft text flawed, imbalanced, say developing countries,” South-North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5405. Available online at: www.twnside.org.sg/title/5405b (accessed 18 August 2004).
267. Khor, M. (2003c) “G21 developing countries prepare for Cancun agricultural battle,” Third World Network Cancun News Update, 1 (10 September).
268. Khor, M. and Hormeku, T. (2003) “Anti-development in substance and process,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5418.
269. Kim, S. S. (2004) “Northeast Asia in the local–regional global nexus: multiple challenges and contending explanations,” in S. S. Kim (ed.) The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
270. Kirsch, P. and Holmes, J. T. (1999) “The Rome Conference on the International Criminal Court: the negotiating process,” American Journal of International Law, 93: 2–12.
271. Kiuchi Takashi (2003) “The future of ASEAN-Japan financial relations,” in ASEANJapan Cooperation: A Foundation for East Asian Community, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
272. Koh, T. B. (1998) “Europe can be Asia’s friend in need,” International Herald Tribune, 2 April.
273. Kohl, O., Lee Jun-Genn, Trach Cuong Loi, and Magata, J. (1999) “Marktzugangspolitik,” in C. Derichs, T. Goydke, and W. Pascha (eds) “Task Force”: Ein Gutachten zu den deutschen/europäischen Außenwirtschaftsbeziehungen mit Japan, Duisburg: Institut für Ostasienwissenschaften, Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Duisburg.
274. Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization [KEDO] (2001) Annual Report.
275. Krasner, S. D. (1983) “Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as inter-vening variables,” in S. D. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
276. Kratochwil, F. (1988) “Regimes, interpretation and the ‘science’ of politics: A reappraisal,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17: 263–84.
277. Kratochwil, F. and Ruggie, J.G. (1986) “International organization: a state of the art on an art of the state,” International Organization, 40: 229–54.
278. Krause, J. and Umbach, F. (eds) (1998) Perspectives of Regional Security Cooperation in Asia–Pacific: Learning from Europe or Developing Indigenous Models? Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.
279. Labour and Employment Ministers’ Conference 1 (2006) More and Better Jobs: Working Jointly to Strengthen the Social Dimension of Globalisation; Chairman’s Conclusions of the First ASEM Labour and Employment Ministers’ Conference, Postdam, 3–5 September 2006.
280. Langhammer, R. J. (1989) “The link between trade with and investment in ASEAN countries: Lessons for EC suppliers and policymakers,” in G. Schiavone (ed.) Western Europe and South-East Asia: Co-operation or Competition?, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
281. Langhammer, R. J. and Hiemenz, U. (1990) Regional Iintegration among Developing Countries: Opportunities, Obstacles and Options, Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).
282. Lasserre, P. and Schütte, H. (1999) Strategies for Asia Pacific: Beyond the Crisis, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.
283. Leary, V. A. (1997) “The WTO and the social clause: post-Singapore,” European Journal of International Law, 8: 118–22.
284. Lee Chong-wha (2000a) “Testing the ‘subsidiarity question’ for ASEM,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed.) The Seoul (2000) Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia-Europe Partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
285. Lee Chong-wha (2000b) “Trade and investment profiles in ASEM process: issues and prospects,” in The Third Seoul ASEM and Asia-Europe Relations, September 29–30, 2000, Seoul, Seoul: The Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies.
286. Lefort, J. C. and Page, J. P. (1998) “Double jeu autour de l’AMI,” Le Monde diplomatique, 535: 23.
287. Lehmann, J. P. (1998) “The economic setting,” in H. Maull, G. Segal and J. Wanandi (eds) Europe and the Asia–Pacific, London: Routledge.
288. Lehmann, J. P. (2000) “ASEM and trade issues,” in The Third Seoul ASEM and Asia–Europe Relations, September 29–30, 2000, Seoul, Seoul: The Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies.
289. Li Jinxiang (1998) Die Rolle der VR China im Rahmen des Global-Sourcing deutscher Industrie- und Handelsunternehmen, Hamburg: Institut für Asienkunde.
290. Lim, P. (1999) Political Issues in EU–ASEAN Relations, Brussels: European Institute of Asian Studies.
291. Lim, P. (2000) “Beyond economic cooperation: prospects for mutual social, cultural and educational ties,” in The Third Seoul ASEM and Asia–Europe Relations, September 29–30, 2000, Seoul, Seoul: The Korean Society of Contemporary European Studies.
292. Lim, P. (2002) “Ideas of a social pillar in ASEM,” in K. Fritsche (ed.) Social Policies and the ASEM Process. International workshop, Berlin (March 4–5, 2002), Essen: Asien-Stiftung.
293. Lim, P. (2003) “Analyzing the ASEM process,” Asia–Europe Journal, 1: 121–41.
294. Lim, P. (2004) “Security co-operation between the European Union and East Asia: what has changed from ASEM I and II to ASEM III in Seoul to ASEM IV in Copenhagen?” Contemporary European Studies Association of Australia Review, 32: 6–20. Available online at: www.cesaa.org.au (accessed 17 August 2005).
295. Lindblom, A. K. (2000) “States, NGOs and the multitude: the problem of representation in international fora,” paper submitted to the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry into Swedish Policy for Global Development.
296. Love, N. S. (1995) “What’s left of Marx?” in S. K. White (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
297. Low, P. and Subramanian, A. (1996) “Beyond TRIMS: a case for multilateral action on investment rules and competition policy,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and Developing Countries, London: Cambridge University Press.
298. Lynch, M. (1999) State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan’s Identity, New York: Columbia University Press.
299. Lynch, M. (2000) “The dialogue of civilisations and the international public sphere,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29: 307–30.
300. Lynch, M. (2002) “Why engage? China and the logic of communicative engagement,” European Journal of International Relations, 8: 187–230.
301. MacLean, R. M. (1999) “The European Community’s Trade Barriers Regulation takes shape – is it living up to expectations?” Journal of World Trade, 33: 69–96.
302. “MAI Provisions and Proposals: An Analysis of the April 1998 Text,” Public Citizen Global Trade Watch, May 1998.
303. Mahncke, D. (1997) “European interest and Southeast Asian security,” Journal of European Studies Chulalongkorn University, 5: 1–16.
304. “Malaysia endorses talks, with conditions,” The Korea Herald, 22 October 2000.
305. Martin, W. and Winters, L. A. (1996) “The Uruguay Round: A milestone for the developing countries,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
306. Maull, H. W. and Tanaka, A. (1997) “The geopolitical dimension,” in The Rationale and common agenda for Asia–Europe Cooperation: CAEC Task Force Reports, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
307. Maupain, F. (1996) “La protection internationale des travailleurs et la libéralisation du commerce mondial: un lien ou un frein?” Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 100: 45–100.
308. Maystadt, P. (2001) “Evolving institutions and transatlantic relations: reforming the global financial architecture,” Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 3: 21–9.
309. Mitchie, J. and Smith, J.G. (eds) (1999) Global Instability: The Political Economy of World Economic Governance, London: Routledge.
310. Molle, W. (2001) The Economics of European Integration: Theory, Practice and Policy, 4th edn, Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
311. Möller, K. (2002) “Diplomatic relations and mutual strategic perceptions: China and the European Union,” in R. L. Edmonds (ed.) China and Europe Since 1978: A European Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
312. Möller, K. (2003) Chinas Außenpolitik: Selektive Multilateralität, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik/Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.
313. Möller, K. (2004) Wirtschaftliche Öffnung und politische Blockade in China. Zwei Gegenläufige Entwicklungen als Stabilitätsrisiko, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik/Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.
314. Möllers, W. (2000) “Viele oberflächliche Gemeinsamkeiten: Dritten Asien-Europa-Gipfel in Seoul,” Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Politischer Kurzbericht, December.
315. “Myanmar an obstacle as EU pushes for FTA with Southeast Asia,” Today Online, 15 May 2006. Available online at: www.bilaterals.org/article-print.php3?id_article=4733 (accessed 5 March 2007).
316. Navarro-Martín, M. and Olalia, M. (2001) ASEM Trust Fund Implementation Completion Report. Philippines: Social Protection and Social Housing – TF 22095, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
317. Nuttall, S. (2000) “ASEM and political dialogue,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed.) The Seoul (2000) Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia–Europe partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
318. Øhrgaard, J. (1997) “‘Less than supranational, more than intergovernmental’: European Political Cooperation and the dynamics of intergovernmental integration,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 26: 1–29.
319. Onuf, N. (1995) “Levels,” European Journal of International Relations, 1: 35–58.
320. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs. Negotiating Group on the MAI (Multilateral Agreement on Investment). Confidential DAFFE/MAI(97)1/REV2 (1997) Multilateral Agreement on Investment: Consolidated Texts and Commentary.
321. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1998) Informal Consultations on International Investment, March.
322. Outhwaite, W. (1995) Habermas: A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: The Polity Press.
323. Palan, R. (2000) “A world of their making: an evaluation of the constructivist critique in international relations,” Review of International Studies, 26: 275–98.
324. Pareira, A. (2003) ASEM (Asia–Europe Meeting) Bestandsaufnahme, Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer interregionalen Kooperation, Frankurt am Main: Peter Lang.
325. Paribatra, S. (2000) “ASEM political dialogue: now and in the future,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed.) The Seoul (2000) Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia–Europe Partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
326. Parry, R. L. (1998) “Asia shows its displeasure with Europe,” The Independent, 3 April.
327. Payne, R. A. and Samhat, N. F. (2002) “Discourse norms in world politics,” paper presented at the 43rd International Studies Association Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March.
328. Payoyo, P. B. (1999) “The EU’s policy response to the financial crisis in Asia,” In V. V. M. Aguirre (ed.) European Studies: Essays by Filipino Scholars, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Centre for Integrative and Development Studies and the Institute of International Legal Studies.
329. Porter, T. (1996) “Capital mobility and currency markets: can they be tamed?” International Journal, 51: 668–89.
330. Pou Saradell, V. (1996) ASEM: Follow-up and New Developments since the Bangkok Summit, Geneva: Modern Asia Research Centre, University of Geneva.
331. Primo Braga, C. A. (1996) “Trade-related intellectual property issues: the Uruguay Round Agreement and its economic implications,” in W. Martin and L. A. Winters (eds) The Uruguay Round and the Developing Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
332. Puchala, D. J. and Hopkins, R. F. (1983) “International regimes: lessons for inductive analysis,” in S. D. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
333. Radelet, S. and Sachs, J. (1998) “The onset of the East Asian financial crisis,” paper presented at a USAID Seminar January 29, 1998 and a NBER [National Bureau of Economic Research] Currency Crises Conference, February.
334. Raghavan, C. (1999) “A theatre of the absurd at Seattle,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 4567.
335. Raghavan, C. (2000) “After Seattle, world trade system faces uncertain future,” Review of International Political Economy, 7: 495–504.
336. Raghavan, C. (2001a) “Harbinson-Moore implementation package doesn’t fly,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], 2 October.
337. Raghavan, C. (2001b) “No new round before settling implementation issues, Mahathir,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], 27 February.
338. Raghavan, C. (2003a) “Cancun text sheds ‘development’ from agenda,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5404.
339. Raghavan, C. (2003b) “Civil society hails Cancun failure, some ask Lamy to resign,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5419.
340. Raghavan, C. (2003c) “Process and substance caused failure at Cancun,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 5420.
341. Raja, K. (2001) “WTO drafts biassed towards the North, charge NGOs,” South–North Development Monitor [SUNS], no. 4999.
342. Rasmussen, N. (2000) “Third ASEM to confirm effectiveness of summit as framework for partnership,” The Korea Herald, 19 October, p. 23.
343. Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (1998) Premier ASEM Séminaire sur Droits de l’Homme et État de Droit: Administration de la justice, les 11–13 décembre 1997, Lund: Raoul Wallenberg Institute.
344. Reddy, R. (2001) “False premises for a new round,” The Hindu, reproduced by the Third World Network, Penang.
345. Reiterer, M. (2002) “The importance of the enhanced implementation of the ASEM Trade Facilitation Action Plan to the growth in trade between the EU and Asian ASEM partners,” in M. Reiterer (ed.) Asia-Europe: Do They Meet? Reflections on the Asia-Europe Meeting [ASEM], Singapore: Asia-–Europe Foundation.
346. Reiterer, M. (2004) “Asia-Europe: Do they Meet? revisited,” in Z. Mantaha and T. Tanaka (eds) Enlarging European Union and Asia: 10th ASEF University, 22 May-5 June 2004, Tokyo, Japan, Singapore: Asia-Europe Foundation.
347. Ricard, P. (2006) “L’Union européenne veut placer l’Asie au coeur de sa politique commerciale,” Le Monde, 12 September. Available online at: www.bilaterals.org/articleprint.php3?id_article=6022 (accessed 5 March 2007).
348. Richards, G. A. (1999a) “Challenging Asia-Europe relations from below? Civil society and the politics of inclusion and opposition,” Journal of the Asia–Pacific Economy, 4: 146–70.
349. Richards, G. A. (1999b) “Civil society responses to the Asian economic crisis: Revisioning Asia-Europe relations from below,” in Chyungly Lee (ed.) Asia–Europe Cooperation after the 1997–1998 Asian Turbulence, Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
350. Richardson, J. L. (1997) “Contending liberalisms,” European Journal of International Relations, 3: 5–33.
351. Risse, T. (2000) “Let’s argue! Communicative action in world politics,” International Organization, 54: 1–40.
352. Robles, A. C. Jr. (2001) ASEM and Asia–Europe Relations between Investment Promotion and the Financial Crisis, Barcelona: Institut Universitari d’Estudis Europeus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Available online at: http://selene.uab.es/_cs_iuee/catala/obs/m_working.html (accessed 21 September 2007).
353. Robles, A. C. Jr. (2003a) “The ASEAN Regional Forum and the European Union as a security system and security actor,” Dialogue and Cooperation, 2: 19–34.
354. Robles, A. C. Jr. (2003b) “On the limits of political dialogue: Interregionalism in the service of multilateralism? ASEM and the WTO,” unpublished manuscript, De La Salle University – Manila.
355. Robles, A. C. Jr. (2004) The Political Economy of Interregional Relations: ASEAN and the EU, Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
356. Rocamora, J. (1999) “The 1997 financial crisis and Asian progressives,” ASEM Watch, no. 48.
357. Rosand, E. (2003) “Security Council Resolution 1373, the Counter-Terrorism Committee and the fight against global terrorism,” American Journal of International Law, 97: 333–41.
358. Ruggie, J. G. (1993) “Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution,” in J. G. Ruggie (ed.) Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of an International Institution, New York: Columbia University Press.
359. Rüland, J. (1996) The Asia-Europe Meeting [ASEM]: Towards a New Euro-Asian Relationship? Rostock: Institut für Politik und Verwaltungswissenschaften, Universität Rostock.
360. Rüland, J. (1998a) “ASEAN and the Asian crisis – repercussions on regional cooperation,” paper presented at the Second Meeting of the European Association of Southeast Asian Studies (EUROSEAS), Hamburg, September.
361. Rüland, J. (1998b) “The future of the ASEM process: Who, how, why and what,” in W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (eds) ASEM: A Window of Opportunity, London: Kegan P. International and the International Association of Asian Studies.
362. Rüland, J. (2000) “ASEM and political dialogue,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed.) The Seoul 2000 Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia-Europe Partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
363. Rüland, J. (2001) “ASEM – transregional forum at the crossroads,” in W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (eds) Asian-European Perspectives: Developing the ASEM Process, Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
364. Rüland, J. (2002) “The European Union as an international and transregional actor: Lessons for global governance from Europe’s relations with Asia,” paper presented at a conference on the EU in international affairs, Australian National University, July.
365. Rustin, C. (1999) “Habermas, discourse ethics and international justice,” Alternatives: Social Transformation and Humane Governance, 24: 167–92.
366. Sachs, J. (1997) “IMF is a power unto itself,” The Financial Times, 11 December.
367. Sánchez Rydelski, M. and Zonnekeyn, G. A. V. R. (1997) “The EC Trade Barriers Regulation – the EC’s move towards a more aggressive market strategy,” Journal of World Trade, 31: 147–60.
368. Sandholtz, W. (1999) “Globalization and the evolution of rules,” in A. Prakash and J. A. Hart (eds) Globalization and Governance, London: Routledge.
369. Sandschneider, E. (2002) “China’s diplomatic relations with the states of Europe,” in R. L. Edmonds (ed.) China and Europe Since 1978: A European Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
370. Scherrer, C. and Greven, T. (1999) Soziale Konditionalisierung des Welthandels: Die Instrumente Sozialklausel, Verhaltenskodex und Gütesiegel in der Diskussion: Gutachten im Auftrag der Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung, Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
371. Schlesinger, P. and Kevin, D. (2000) “Can the European Union become a sphere of publics?” in E. O. Eriksen and J. E. Fossum (eds) Democracy in the European Union: Integration Through Deliberation? London: Routledge.
372. Schmidt, F. and Herberg, M. (2004) “Das ASEM People’s Forum in Hanoi. Ist ein zivilgesellschaftlicher Diskurs in Vietnam möglich?” Kurzberichte aus der internationalen Zusammenarbeit Asien und Pazifik Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, September.
373. Seet-Cheng, M. (1994) “How can the obstacles to an improved EU presence be over-come?” presented at the European Commission – Financial Times Interactive Forum Towards a New European Economic Strategy for Asia, Brussels, October.
374. Segal, G. (1997) “Thinking strategically about ASEM: the subsidiarity question,” The Pacific Review, 10: 124–34.
375. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 1 (1996) Chairman’s Statement, Brussels, 25 July.
376. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 2 (1997) Chairman’s Statement, Tokyo, 6 June.
377. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 3 (1998) Chairman’s Statement, Brussels, 5–6 February.
378. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 4 (1999) Co-Chairmen’s Summary, Singapore, 11–13 February.
379. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 5 (1999) Co-Chair’s Summary, Brussels, 7–8 July.
380. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 6 (2000) Chairman’s Statement, Seoul, 13 May.
381. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 7 (2001) Co-Chair’s Summary, Brussels, 4–5 July.
382. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 8 (2002) Chair’s Statement, Bali, 17 July.
383. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 9 (2003) Chair’s Statement, Paris, 6 June.
384. Senior Officials’ Meeting on Trade and Investment [SOMTI] 10 (2005) Chairman’s Summary, Qingdao, China, 18–19 July.
385. Sideri, S. (1996) “Regional integration in the Asia-Pacific region and its implications for Europe,” Journal of European Studies Chulalongkorn University, 4: 53–94.
386. Siroën, J. M. (1996) “Développement économique et développement social: l’incidence d’une clause sociale,” in Les Relations entre le Développement Economique et le Développement Social: Incidences d’un socle de normes sociales minimum, Paris: Ministère de l’Industrie.
387. Snitwongse, K. (1998) “Thirty years of ASEAN: achievements through political cooperation,” The Pacific Review, 11: 183–94.
388. Société Française pour le Droit International (1999) Un accord multilatéral sur l’investissement: D’un forum de négociation à l’autre? Paris: Editions A. Pedone.
389. Soesastro, H. and Nuttall, S. (1997) “The institutional dimension,” in Council for Asia- Europe Cooperation, The Rationale and Common Agenda for Asia-Europe Cooperation. CAEC Task Force Reports, Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.
390. Solidum, E. (1983) “An ASEAN perspective on the decision-making process in the European Economic Community,” in P. V. Quisumbing and B. B. Domingo (eds) EEC and ASEAN: Two Regional Community Experiences, Manila: Foreign Service Institute and University of the Philippines Law Center.
391. Solidum, E. (1997) “Prospects of security in ASEAN,” in M. L. Aranal-Sereno and J. S. Santiago (eds) The ASEAN: Thirty Years and Beyond, Quezon City: Institute of International Legal Studies, University of the Philippines Law Center.
392. Strange, S. (1994) “Wake up Krasner! The world has changed,” Review of International Political Economy, 1: 209–20.
393. Stuart, L. (2003a) “Cancun diary,” Christian Aid, 14 September. Available online at: www.christianaid.org.uk/cancun/030914htm (accessed 12 April 2005).
394. Stuart, L. (2003b) “Cancun diary,” Christian Aid, 15 September. Available online at: www.christianaid.org.uk/cancun/030915htm (accessed 12 April 2005).
395. Stubbs, R. (1998) “Asia-Pacific regionalism versus globalization: competing forms of capitalism,” in W. D. Coleman and G. R. D. Underhill (eds) Regionalism and Global Economic Integration: Europe, Asia and the Americas, London: Routledge.
396. Stückelberger, C. (1996) “Sozialklauseln im internationalen Handel: Wirtschaftsethische Kriterien,” Aussenwirtschaft. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für internationale Wirtschaftsbeziehungen, 51: 75–100.
397. Sundberg, D. and Vermulst, E. (2001) “The EC Trade Barriers Regulation: obstacle to trade?” Journal of World Trade, 35: 989–1014.
398. Tan Hong (2002) Implementation Completion Report ASEM Trust Fund 021697 Malaysia: Enhancing Industrial and Export Competitiveness (Bank-executed), Washington, DC: The World Bank.
399. Tang Shaocheng (2003) “The EU’s Taiwan policy in the light of its China policy,” Asia- Europe Journal, 1: 511–25.
400. Tobin, J. (1996) “Prologue,” in M. ul Haq, I. Kaul and I. Grunberg (eds) The Tobin Tax: Coping with Financial Volatility, New York: Oxford University Press.
401. Todorov, T. (1982) La Conquête de l’Amérique. La question de l’autre, Paris: Editions du Seuil.
402. Togo Kazuhiko (2004) “Japan and ASEM,” in W. Stokhof, P. van der Velde and Yeo Lay Hwee (eds) The Eurasian Space: Far More than Two Continents, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
403. Tong Gia-Dong (2001) “The European Union and China: the benefits of openness in international economic integration,” in P. W. Preston and J. Gilson (eds) The European Union and East Asia – Interregional Linkages in a Changing Global System, heltenham: Edward Elgar.
404. Ton Sinh Thanh (1998) “The Asia-Europe Meeting: ASEAN and EU perspectives,” unpublished research essay, Carleton University.
405. Trade Facilitation Action Plan [TFAP] (1998a) Framework for the Trade Facilitation Action Plan, Makuhari, Japan, 27–8 September.
406. Trade Facilitation Action Plan [TFAP] (1998b) Consolidated and Prioritised List of Major Generic Trade Barriers Among ASEM Partners.
407. Trade Facilitation Action Plan [TFAP] (1998c) Consolidated “Deliverables”/Concrete Goals 1998–2000.
408. Trade Facilitation Action Plan [TFAP] (2000) Evaluation of the ASEM Trade Facilitation Action Plan 1998–2000, Seoul, May.
409. Trade Facilitation Action Plan [TFAP] (2002) A Synthesis of Reports by Some ASEM Members on Measures Taken to Address the Consolidated and Prioritised List of the Major Generic Trade Barriers among ASEM Partners.
410. Trichet, J. C. (2004) “The international financial architecture: where do we stand?” Dinner speech at the Conference “Dollars, Debts and Deficits – 60 Years after Bretton Woods,” Madrid, June.
411. Tsutsumibayashi, K. (2005) “Fusion of horizons or confusion of horizons? Intercultural dialogue and its risks,” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 11: 103–14.
412. van der Geest, W. (2000) “Comments on ‘Testing the subsidiarity questions for ASEM,’ by Chong-wha Lee,” in Chong-wha Lee (ed) The Seoul (2000) Summit: The Way Ahead for the Asia-Europe Partnership, Seoul: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
413. Van Haute, P. (2000) “Concluding remarks,” presented at the Second EU-ASEAN Think Tank Dialogue, Strasbourg, October.
414. Von Hauff, M. (2002) “The significance of social protection for the ASEM dialogue,” in K. Fritsche (ed.) Social Policies and the ASEM Process. International Workshop, Berlin (March 4–5, 2002), Essen: Asienstiftung.
415. Waever, O. (2000) “The EU as a security actor: reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders,” in M. Kelstrup and M. C. Williams (eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community, London: Routledge.
416. Wallace, W. and Soogil Young (2004) Asia-Europe: Global Governance Challenge to Cooperation: Our Shared Agenda, Council on Asia-Europe Cooperation Task Force 2003–04.
417. Wallach, L. M. (1998) “Le nouveau manifeste du capitalisme mondial,” Le Monde diplomatique, 527: 22.
418. Walter, A. (2001) “NGOs, business and international investment: the multilateral agreement on investment, Seattle and beyond,” Global Governance, 7: 51–74.
419. Warkentin, C. and Mingst, K. (2000) “International institutions, the state and global civil society in the age of the World Wide Web,” Global Governance, 6: 237–58.
420. Watanabe, A. (2001) “Japan’s position on human rights in Asia,” in S. J. Maswood (ed.) Japan and East Asian Regionalism, London: Routledge.
421. Wendt, A. (1987) “The agent–structure problem in international relations theory,” International Organization, 41: 335–70.
422. Wendt, A. (1991) “Bridging the theory/meta-theory gap in international relations,” Review of International Studies, 17: 382–3.
423. Wendt, A. (1992) “Anarchy is what states make of it,” International Organization, 46: 391–425.
424. Wendt, A. (1998) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
425. Wermasubun, D. S. (2003) Privatization of the Indonesian Water Sector, Jakarta: The Business Watch Indonesia.
426. Wesley, M. (1999) “The Asian crisis and the adequacy of regional institutions,” Contemporary Southeast Asia, 21: 54–73.
427. Wilkinson, E. (1990) Japan Versus the West: Image and Reality, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
428. Woodman, S. (2002) “Words obscure actions: human rights research in China,” GSC Quarterly. Available online at: www.ssrc.org/programs/gsc/gsc_quarterly/newsletter6/content/woodman2 (accessed 23 October 2004).
429. World Bank, n.d. Implementation Completion Memo: ASEM TF#020611; Monitoring the Regional Implementation of Structural Reforms and Deregulation Program.
430. World Bank (2003) Asian Financial Crisis Response Fund 1: Completion Report, Washington, DC: World Bank.
431. Yahuda, M. (1998) “Europe and China,” in H. W. Maull, G. Segal and J. Wanandi (eds) Europe and the Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge.
432. Yano, K. (1999) “Thirty years of being a respondent in anti-dumping proceedings: Abuse of economic relief can have a negative impact on competition policy,” Journal of World Trade, 33: 31–47.
433. Yeo Lay Hwee (2002) ASEM: The Asia-Europe Meeting Process: From Sexy Summit to Strong Partnership? Copenhagen: Danish Institute of International Affairs.
434. Yeo Lay Hwee (2003) “ASEM: from summit diplomacy to regime creation,” unpublished thesis, National University of Singapore.
435. Yeo Lay Hwee (2004) “The ASEM story… so far,” ASEM Research Platform Newsbrief.
436. Yoo Choong-Mo (2000) “ASEM can’t resolve bilateral trade conflicts, report says,” The Korea Herald, 19 October, p. 8.
437. Youngs, R. (2001) The European Union and the Promotion of Democracy: Europe’s Mediterranean and Asian Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
438. Zhang Yunling (1998) “Europe and China,” in H. W. Maull, G. Segal and J. Wanandi (eds) Europe and the Asia-Pacific, London: Routledge.
439. Zhao Chenggen and McGough, S. (2001) “China: the politics of ‘rational authoritarianism,’” in P. W. Preston and J. Gilson (eds) The European Union and East Asia – Interregional Linkages in a Changing Global System, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
440. Zhao Gancheng (1999) “Assessing China’s impact on Asia-Europe relations,” in W. Stokhof and P. van der Velde (eds) ASEM: A Window of Opportunity, London: Kegan Paul International.