Comparing GATT and GATS: Regime creation under and after hegemony

Review of International Political Economy

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 65-94

  Ahnlid, Anders ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

GATT; Hegemony; International regimes; Multilateral negotiations; Services; Trade policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039611817     PISSN: 09692290     EISSN: 14664526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09692299608434345     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Keohane, R.: ‘The theory of hegemonic stability and changes in international economic regimes, 1967-1977’ in Holsti et al. Change in the International System, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980.
2. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1965.
3. Kindelberger, C.: The World in Depression, 1929-1939, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
4. Lake, D.: Power, Protection, and Free Trade - International Sources of U.S. Commercial Strategy 1887- 1939, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988, pp. 8-11.
5. Bhagwati, J. and Irwin, D.: ‘The return of the reciprocitarians - US trade policy today’ in The World Economy, vol. 10, 2, 1987.
6. GATT: Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Marrakesh, 15 April 1994.
7. Krasner, S.: ‘Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables’, in Krasner, S. (ed.): International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983, p. 2.
8. Strange, S.: ‘The persistent myth of lost hegemony’ in International Organization, Fall 1987.
9. Gowa, J.: ‘Rational hegemons, excludable goods, and small groups’ in World Politics, Vol. XLI, 3, April 1989, p. 307.
10. Snidal, D.: ‘The limits of hegemonic stability theory’ in International Organization 39 (4) Autumn 1985, and Lake (1988).
11. Keohane, R.: After Hegemony. Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.
12. Snidal, Lake, and Rosecrance, R. and Taw, J. (1985, 1988): ‘Japan and the theory of international leadership’ in World Politics, vol. 42, No. 2, Jan. 1990.
13. Keohane, R., ‘Reciprocity in international relations’ in International Organization 40, Winter 1986, p.4.
14. Krasner, S.: ‘The Tokyo Round. Particularistic interests and prospects for stability in the global trading system’ in International Studies Quarterly, vol. 23 no. 4, December 1979 pp.491-531
15. Reyna, J.: ‘Services’ in Stewart, T. (ed.): The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History 1986-1992, Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1993, p.2 and IMF Survey, 21 May 1984.
16. Ryan, C.: ‘Trade liberalisation and financial services’ in World Economy, Vol. 13 (3) Sept. 1990.
17. Balassa, B. ‘The United State’ in Messerlin, P. and Sauvant, K. (eds) The Uruguay Round. Services in the World Economy, World Bank, 1990, p.129.
18. Drake, W. and Nicolaïdis, K.: ‘Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: “trade in services” and the Uruguay Round’ in International Organization 46 (1) Winter 1992, p.46.
19. Feketekuty, G.: International Trade in Services. An Overview and Blueprint for Negotiations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger 1988.
20. Grey, R.: Concepts of Trade Diplomacy and Trade in Services, London: Trade Policy Research Centre, 1990.
21. ‘U.S. objectives and interests’, address by Ambassador Rufus Yerxa, printed in Uruguay Round Trade in Services Perspectives, Applied Services Economic Centre, 1990, p.63.
22. Finlayson, J. and Zacher, M.: ‘The GATT and the regulation of trade barriers: Regime dynamics and functions’, in Krasner, S. (ed.): International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp.273-314.
23. Axelrod, R.: The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, 1984.
24. Rhodes, C.: ‘Reciprocity in trade: The utility of a bargaining strategy’ in International Organization 43 (2) Spring 1989.
25. Krasner, S.: Asymmetries in Japanese-American Trade. The Case for Specific Reciprocity, Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, 1987, pp. 64-7.
26. Ahnlid, A., ‘Free or forced riders? Small states in the international political economy: The example of Sweden’, in Cooperation and Conflict, Volume 27 (3), September 1992.
27. Spero, J., The Politics of International Economic Relations, New York: St Martin’s Press, second edition, 1981, p.80.
28. Cline, W.: ‘”Reciprocity”: A new approach to world trade policy?’ in Cline, W. (ed.): Trade Policy in the 1980s. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 1983.
29. Honorable Lloyd Bentsen, The Uruguay Round Trade Negotiations, US Senate, Thursday, 6 February 1992.
30. Ahnlid, A.: Reciprocitetsnormen och liberaliseringsmetoder i GATT, Arbetsrapport no. 17. Stockholm: Utredningssekretariatet, Kommerskollegium, 1987.
31. Deardorff, A., Market Access in the Uruguay Round and Beyond, draft comments prepared for an OECD Workshop on the New World Trading System, Paris, 25-26 April 1994, pp.11-13.
32. Curzon, G.: Multilateral Commercial Diplomacy. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and its Impact on National Commercial Policies and Techniques, London: Michael Joseph, 1965, p.57.
33. Winham, G.: International Trade and the Tokyo Round Negotiation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986, p.31.
34. Curzon (1965), p.61 and UN document E/PC/T/TAC/SR/2, pp.4-5.
35. GATT Uruguay Round document MTN.GNS/33, pp.8-13.
36. GATT Uruguay Round document MTN.GNS/32, p.22, and MTN.GNS/33, p.4.
37. GATT Uruguay Round document MTN.GNS/32, p.19, and MTN.GNS/33, p.6.
38. Snape, R.: ‘Principles in trade in services’, in Messerlin, P. and Sauvant, K. (eds) (1990) p.6.
39. Woodrow, B. (ed.): Uruguay Round Trade in Services Perspectives, Geneva: ASEC, 1990, p.15.
40. Hindley, B.: ‘Principles in factor-related trade in services’ in Messerlin, P. and Sauvant, K. (eds) (1990), p.12.
41. Voigt, S.: ‘Traded Services in the GATT – what’s all the fuss about?’ in Intereconomics, July/August 1991. pp. 177-8.
42. Ryan, C.: ‘Trade liberalisation and financial services’ in World Economy, Vol. 13 (3) Sept. 1990.