Comparison of accuracy and time-efficiency of CT colonography between conventional and panoramic 3D interpretation methods: An anthropomorphic phantom study

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 80, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Choi, Joon Il ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^b   Kim, Seung Ho ^b   Park, Hee Sun ^c   Lee, Jeong Min ^b   Lee, Jae Young ^b   Han, Joon Koo ^b   Choi, Byung Ihn ^b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphic phantom; Colon; Colonic polyp; CT colonography; Three dimensional interpretation method

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SWINE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME;

ANIMALS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SWINE;

EID: 80053632865     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. P.J. Pickhardt, R. Choi, and I. Hwang Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349 2003 2191 2200 (Pubitemid 37485135)
2. D.C. Rockey, E. Paulson, and D. Niedzwiecki Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison Lancet 365 2005 305 311 (Pubitemid 40139107)
3. P.B. Cotton, V.L. Durkalski, and B.C. Pineau Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia JAMA 291 2004 1713 1719 (Pubitemid 38489893)
4. S.H. Kim, B.I. Choi, and J.K. Han CT colonography in an Asian population with a high residue diet: comparison between wet and dry preparations Clin Radiol 61 2006 483 494
5. M.A. Barish, J.A. Soto, and J.T. Ferrucci Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy Am J Roentgenol 184 2005 786 792 (Pubitemid 43899502)
6. T. Mang, C. Schaefer-Prokop, and W. Schima Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study Eur J Radiol 70 2009 86 93
7. P.J. Pickhardt, A.D. Lee, and A.J. Taylor Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography Am J Roentgenol 189 2007 1451 1456 (Pubitemid 350174811)
8. S.A. Taylor, S. Halligan, and A. Slater Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software Radiology 239 2006 759 767 (Pubitemid 43830611)
9. J.E. East, B.P. Saunders, and D. Boone Uni-and bidirectional wide angle CT colonography: effect on missed areas, surface visualization, viewing time and polyp conspicuity Eur Radiol 18 2008 1910 1917
10. P.J. Pickhardt, C. Schumacher, and D.H. Kim Polyp detection at 3-dimensional endoluminal computed tomography colonography: sensitivity of one-way fly-through at 120 degrees field-of-view angle J Comput Assist Tomogr 33 2009 631 635
11. V.A. Fisichella, F. Jäderling, S. Horvath, P.O. Stotzer, A. Kilander, and M. Hellström Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients Acta Radiol 50 2009 244 255
12. S.H. Kim, J.M. Lee, and H.W. Eun Two-versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography Radiology 244 2007 852 864
13. S.S. Lee, S.H. Park, and J.K. Kim Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circimferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography Eur Radiol 19 2009 1951 1959
14. B. Geiger, C. Chefd'hotel, and S. Sudarsky Panoramic views for virtual endoscopy Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 8 2005 662 669 (Pubitemid 43828307)
15. C.F. Beaulieu, R.B. Jeffrey Jr., C. Karadi, D.S. Paik, and S. Napel Display modes for CT colonography. II. Blinded comparison of axial CT and virtual endoscopic and panoramic endoscopic volume-rendered studies Radiology 212 1999 203 212 (Pubitemid 29302536)
16. S.H. Kim, J.M. Lee, and C.I. Shin Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study Radiology 248 2008 492 503
17. M.W. Lee, S.H. Kim, and H.S. Park An anthropomorphic phantom study of computer-aided detection performance for polyp detection on CT colonography: a comparison of commercially and academically available systems Am J Roentgenol 193 2009 445 454
18. T. Mang, A.N. Graser, W. Schima, and A. Maier CT colonography: techniques, indications, findings Eur J Radiol 61 2007 388 399 (Pubitemid 46290616)
19. P.J. Pickhardt, P.A. Nugent, J.R. Choi, and W.R. Schindler Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy Am J Roentgenol 183 2004 1343 1347 (Pubitemid 44210599)
20. S.H. Park, H.K. Ha, and A.Y. Kim Flat polyps of the colon: detection with 16-MDCT colonography-preliminary results Am J Roentgenol 186 2006 1611 1617 (Pubitemid 46112524)