Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: Comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 201-209

  Vogt, Christoph ^a,b   Cohnen, Mathias ^a   Beck, Andreas ^a   Vom Dahl, Stephan ^a   Aurich, Volker ^a   Mödder, Ulrich ^a   Häussinger, Dieter ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DÜSSELDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NOISE REDUCTION; POLYP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0348169549     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01684-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Eddy DM. Screening for colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:373-84.
2. Kronborg O. Staging and surgery for colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 1993;29A:575-83.
3. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-71.
4. Schoen RE. The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:65-70.
5. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002;12:1-9.
6. Sieg A, Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U, Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:620-7.
7. Hall C, Dorricott NJ, Donovan IA, Neoptolemos JP. Colon perforation during colonoscopy: surgical versus conservative management. Br J Surg 1991;78:542-4.
8. Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2784-7.
9. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope. Endoscopy 2002;34:711-4.
10. Schmiegel W, Adler G, Fruhmorgen P, Folsch U, Graeven U, Layer P, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: prevention and early detection in an asymptomatic population - prevention in patients at risk - endoscopic diagnosis, therapy and aftercare of polyps and carcinomas. German Society of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases/Study Group for Gastrointestinal Oncology [German]. Z Gastroenterol 2000;38:49-75.
11. Winawer SJ. A quarter century of colorectal cancer screening: progress and prospects. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:6S-12S.
12. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut 2001;48:753-4.
13. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Domagk D, Lugering N, Neumann E, Heindel W. Colorectal polyps: detection with multi-slice CT colonography. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001;173:1069-71.
14. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001;219:685-92.
15. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, Nio CY, Determann RM, Tipker CA, et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002;224:25-33.
16. Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Di Giulio E, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 2002;34:441-6.
17. Johnson CD, Hara AK, Reed JE. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for detecting colorectal neoplasms. Endoscopy 1997;29:454-61.
18. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, Ehman RL, et al. Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1181-4.
19. Gluecker T, Dorta G, Keller W, Jornod P, Meuli R, Schnyder P. Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gut 2002;51:207-11.
20. Cohnen M, Vogt C, Aurich V, Beck A, Haussinger D, Modder U. Multi-slice CT-colonography in low-dose technique: preliminary results. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002;174:835-8.
21. Chaoui AS, Blake MA. CT colonography and colorectal screening. Gut 2002;50:284.
22. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1496-503.
23. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, Dymarkowski S, Gevers A, Rutgeerts P, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 2002;12:1410-5.
24. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002;222:337-45.
25. Morrin MM, Raptopoulos V. Contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001;22:420-4.
26. Xynopoulos D, Stasinopoulou M, Dimitroulopoulos D, Tsamakides K, Arhavlis E, Kontou M, et al. Colorectal polyp detection with virtual colonoscopy (computed tomographic colonography); the reliability of the method. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:124-7.
27. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, Milano A, Katz SS, Resnick D, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thinsection low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002;224:383-92.
28. Luboldt W, Morrin MM. MR colonography: status and perspective. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:400-9.
29. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelman RR. MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-6.
30. Yee J. Virtual colonoscopy (CT and MR colonography). Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:S25-32.
31. Lauenstein TC, Debatin JF. Magnetic resonance colonography for colorectal cancer screening. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001;22:443-53.
32. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale - update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-60.
33. Winkler G, Aurich V, Hahn K, Martin A, Rodenacker K. Noise reduction in images: some recent edge-preserving methods. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis 1999;9:749-66.
34. Wise KN. Solid cancer risks from radiation exposure for the Australian population. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2003;26:53-62.
35. Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, Dixon MF, Yoshida S, Chalmers DM, et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000;355:1211-4.
36. Fujii T, Rembacken BJ, Dixon MF, Yoshida S, Axon AT. Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed? Endoscopy 1998;30:437-43.
37. Fidler JL, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, Hara AK, Harmsen WS. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:292-300.
38. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8.
39. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 2002;224:393-403.
40. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ. Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 2000;215:353-7.