Comparisons of five Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1076-1083

  Zhou, Haifeng ^a,b   Lan, Tianqing ^b,c   Dien, Bruce S ^d   Hector, Ronald E ^d   Zhu, J Y ^b  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Editoral Office   (China)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethanol; Inhibitors; Pretreatment; Toxicity; Yeast fermentation

Indexed keywords

BIOETHANOL; CORROSION INHIBITORS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; TOXICITY;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSATES; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL PRODUCTIVITY; PARTIAL LOADING; PRE-TREATMENT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE STRAINS; XYLOSE FERMENTATION; YEAST FERMENTATION;

YEAST;

PINUS CONTORTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ALCOHOL; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MONOSACCHARIDE; SULFITE;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; FERMENTATION; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PINE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; LIGNIN; MONOSACCHARIDES; PINUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SULFITES;

EID: 84914170018     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.1937     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Scharlemann JPW, Laurance WF. How green are biofuels? Science. 2008;319:43-44.
2. Zhu JY, Zhuang XS. Conceptual net energy output for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass through biorefining. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012;38:583-589.
3. Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow A, Graham RL, Stokes B, Erbach DC. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Dept. of Energy; 2005.
4. Zhu JY, Pan XJ. Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4992-5002.
5. Zhu JY, Pan XJ, Wang GS, Gleisner R. Sulfite pretreatment (SPORL) for robust enzymatic saccharification of spruce and red pine. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:2411-2418.
6. Wang ZJ, Lan TQ, Zhu JY. Lignosulfonate and elevated pH can enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:9.
7. Wang Z, Zhu JY, Fu Y, Qin M, Shao Z, Jiang J, Yang F. Lignosulfonate-mediated cellulase adsorption: enhanced enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulose through weakening nonproductive binding to lignin. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:156.
8. Zhou H, Lou H, Yang D, Zhu JY, Qiu X. Lignosulfonate to enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses: role of molecular weight and substrate lignin. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:8464-8470.
9. Xavier AMRB, Correia MF, Pereira SR, Evtuguin DV. Second-generation bioethanol from eucalyptus sulphite spent liquor. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:2755-2762.
10. Helle SS, Lin T, Duff SJB. Optimization of spent sulfite liquor fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2008;42:259-264.
11. Tian S, Luo XL, Yang XS, Zhu JY. Robust cellulosic ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepolep pine using an adapted strain S. cerevisiae without detoxification. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8678-8685.
12. Lan TQ, Gleisner R, Zhu JY, Dien BS, Hector RE. High titer ethanol production from SPORL-pretreated lodgepole pine by simultaneous enzymatic saccharification and combined fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:291-297.
13. Zhu JY, Zhu W, OBryan P, Dien BS, Tian S, Gleisner R, Pan XJ. Ethanol production from sporl-pretreated lodgepole pine: preliminary evaluation of mass balance and process energy efficiency. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1355-1365.
14. Zhou H, Zhu JY, Luo X, Leu S-Y, Wu X, Gleisner R, Dien BS, Hector RE, Yang D, Qiu X, Horn E, Negron J. Bioconversion of beetle-killed lodgepole pine using SPORL: process scale-up design, lignin coproduct, and high solids fermentation without detoxification. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52:8464-8470.
15. Weil JR, Dien B, Bothast R, Hendrickson R, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR. Removal of fermentation inhibitors formed during pretreatment of biomass by polymeric adsorbents. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:6132-6138.
16. Hector RE, Dien BS, Cotta MA, Qureshi N. Engineering industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for xylose fermentation and comparison for switchgrass conversion. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:1193-1202.
17. Koch AL. Growth measurement. Methods Gen Mol Bacteriol. 1994;248-277.
18. Jeffries TW, Jin Y-S. Metabolic engineering for improved fermentation of xylose by yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;63:495-509.
19. Keating JD, Robinson J, Bothast RJ, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. Characterization of a unique ethanologenic yeast capable of fermenting galactose. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2004;35:242-253.
20. Luo X, Gleisner R, Tian S, Negron J, Horn E, Pan XJ, Zhu JY. Evaluation of mountain beetle infested lodgepole pine for cellulosic ethanol production by SPORL pretreatment. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49:8258-8266.
21. Lou H, Zhu JY, Lan TQ, Lai H, Qiu X. pH-induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. ChemSusChem. 2013;6:919-927.
22. Lan TQ, Lou H, Zhu JY. Enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses should be conducted at elevated pH 5.2-6.2. Bioenerg Res. 2013;6:476-485.
23. Wang ZJ, Zhu JY, Gleisner R, Chen KF. Ethanol production form poplar wood the rough enzymatic saccharification and fermentation by dilute acid and SPORL pretreatments. Fuel. 2012;95:606-614.
24. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:25-33.
25. Helle SS, Cameron DR, Lam J, White B, Duff SJB. Effect of inhibitory compounds found in biomass hydrolysates on growth and xylose fermentation by a genetially engineered strain of S. Cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;33:786-792.
26. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ, Dien BS, Berhow MA, Kurtzman CP, Gorsich SW. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2, 5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31:345-352.
27. Villa GP, Bartrolli R, Lopez R, Guerra R, Enrique M, Penas M, Rodriquez E, Redondo D, Iglesias I, Diaz M. Microbial transformation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Biotechnol. 1992;12:509-512.
28. Almeida JRM, Runquist D, Sànchez Nogué V, Lidén G, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Stress-related challenges in pentose fermentation to ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol J. 2011;6:286-299.
29. Navarro AR. Effects of furfural on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mathematical models. Curr Microbiol. 1994;29:87-90.
30. Keating JD, Panganiban C, Mansfield SD. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93:1196-1206.
31. Huisjes EH, de Hulster E, van Dam JC, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Galacturonic acid inhibits the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on galactose, xylose, and arabinose. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5052-5059.
32. Casey E, Sedlak M, Ho NWY, Mosier NS. Effect of acetic acid and pH on the cofermentation of glucose and xylose to ethanol by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10:385-393.
33. Medina VG, Almering MJH, Van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:190-195.
34. Hasunuma T, Sung KM, Sanda T, Yoshimura K, Matsuda F, Kondo A. Efficient fermentation of xylose to ethanol at high formic acid concentrations by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:997-1004.
35. Russell JB. Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at low pH: anion accumulation versus uncoupling. J Appl Bacteriol. 1992;73:363-370.
36. Meinander NQ, Boels I, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of xylose/glucose mixtures by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing XYL1 and XYL2 from Pichia stipitis with and without overexpression of TAL1. Bioresour Technol. 1999;68:79-87.
37. Jin YS, Ni H, Laplaza JM, Jeffries TW. Optimal growth and ethanol production from xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae require moderate d-xylulokinase activity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:495-503.
38. van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MAH, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006;90:391-418.
39. Runquist D, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Rådström P. Comparison of heterologous xylose transporters in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3(1).
40. Kotter P, Ciriacy M. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;38:776-783.
41. Saloheimo A, Rauta J, Stasyk OV, Sibirny AA, Penttilä M, Ruohonen L. Xylose transport studies with xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains expressing heterologous and homologous permeases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:1041-1052.
42. Subtil T, Boles E. Competition between pentoses and glucose during uptake and catabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5.
43. Bailey RB, Benitez T, Woodward A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants resistant to catabolite repression: use in cheese whey hydrolysate fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;44:631-639.
44. Keating JD, Robinson J, Cotta MA, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. An ethanologenic yeast exhibiting unusual metabolism in the fermentation of lignocellulosic hexose sugars. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31:235-244.
45. Young EM, Comer AD, Huang H, Alper HS. A molecular transporter engineering approach to improving xylose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:401-411.
46. Hector RE, Dien BS, Cotta MA, Mertens JA. Growth and fermentation of d-xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a novel d-xylose isomerase originating from the bacterium Prevotella ruminicola TC2-24. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1).
47. Hector RE, Qureshi N, Hughes SR, Cotta MA. Expression of a heterologous xylose transporter in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to utilize xylose improves aerobic xylose consumption. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80:675-684.