Galacturonic acid inhibits the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on galactose, xylose, and arabinose

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 5052-5059

  Huisjes, Eline H ^a   de Hulster, Erik ^a   van Dam, Jan C ^a   Pronk, Jack T ^a   van Maris, Antonius J A ^a  

^a KLUYVER CENTRE FOR GENOMICS OF INDUSTRIAL FERMENTATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC FERMENTATION; ANAEROBIC BATCH CULTURES; CELLULAR HOMEOSTASIS; CITRUS PEEL; COMPETITIVE INHIBITION; CONSUMPTION RATES; ENERGY REQUIREMENTS; FERMENTATION KINETICS; GALACTURONIC ACIDS; GLUCOSE CONSUMPTION; INHIBITED GROWTH; MICROBIAL CONVERSIONS; MIXED SUBSTRATES; S.CEREVISIAE; SUBSTRATE UPTAKE; SUGAR ACID; SUGAR BEET PULP; WASTE STREAM; YEAST FERMENTATION; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BATCH CELL CULTURE; ETHANOL; FEEDSTOCKS; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; GROWTH KINETICS; PH EFFECTS; SUBSTRATES; SUGAR BEETS;

YEAST;

ARABINOSE; GALACTOSE; GALACTURONIC ACID; HEXURONIC ACID; XYLOSE;

ENZYME ACTIVITY; FERMENTATION; GROWTH; HOMEOSTASIS; INHIBITION; INHIBITOR; PH; SUBSTRATE; YEAST;

ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CULTURE MEDIUM; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FERMENTATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PH; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMAL FEED; ARABINOSE; CULTURE MEDIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FERMENTATION; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GALACTOSE; HEXURONIC ACIDS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; XYLOSE;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS; CITRUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84866294476     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.07617-11     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbott DA, et al. 2007. Generic and specific transcriptional responses to different weak organic acids in anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 7:819-833.
2. Barnett J.A, Payne R.W, Yarrow D. 1990. A guide to identifying and classifying yeasts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
3. Bellissimi E,Dijken J.P.V., Pronk JT.,Maris A.J.A.V. 2009. Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xyloseisomerase- based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 9:358-364.
4. Bera A, Sedlak M, Khan A, Ho NWY. 2010. Establishment of L-arabinose fermentation in glucose/xylose co-fermenting recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST) by genetic engineering. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87:1803-1811.
5. Boender LGM, et al. 2011. Extreme calorie restriction and energy source starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae represent distinct physiological states. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813:2133-2144.
6. Boender LGM, de Hulster EAF, van Maris AJA, Daran-Lapujade PAS, Pronk JT. 2009. Quantitative physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at near-zero specific growth rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5607-5614.
7. Canelas AB, et al. 2008. Leakage-free rapid quenching technique for yeast metabolomics. Metabolomics 4:226 -239.
8. Ciriacy M, Breitenbach I. 1979. Physiological effects of 7 different blocks in glycolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 139:152-160
9. Daran JM, Dallies N, Thines-Sempoux D, Paquet V, Francois J. 1995. Genetic and biochemical characterization of the UGP1 gene encoding the UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84-86:141-152.
10. Doran JB, Cripe J, Sutton M, Foster B. 2000. Fermentations of pectinrich biomass with recombinant bacteria to produce fuel ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 84-86:141-152.
11. Frey P. 1996. The Leloir pathway: a mechanistic imperative for three enzymes to change the stereochemical configuration of a single carbon in galactose. FASEB J. 10:461- 470.
12. Gancedo C, Gancedo JM. 1985. Phosphorylation of 3-O-methyl-Dglucose and catabolite repression in yeast. Eur. J. Biochem. 148:593-597.
13. Gancedo JM. 1998. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:334-361.
14. Grohmann K, Bothast RJ. 1994. Pectin-rich residues generated by processing of citrus fruits, apples, and sugar beets-enzymatic hydrolysis and biological conversion to value-added products. ACS Symp. Ser. 566:372-390.
15. Guadalupe Medina VG, Almering MJH, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. 2010. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:190- 195.
16. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Liden G, Zacchi G. 2006. Bio-ethanol-the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 24:549-556.
17. Hamacher T, Becker J, G ärdonyi M, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Boles E. 2002. Characterization of the xylose-transporting properties of yeast hexose transporters and their influence on xylose utilization. Microbiology 148: 2783-2788.
18. Heredia CF, Delafuente G, Sols A. 1964. Metabolic studies with 2 deoxyhexoses. 1. Mechanisms of inhibition of growth and fermentation in baker's yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 86:216-223.
19. Jimeno Abendano J, Kepes A. 1973. Sensitization of D-glucuronic acid transport system of E. coli to protein group reagents in presence of substrate or absence of energy source. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 54:1342-1346.
20. Klein CL, Rasmussen J, Rønnow B, Olsson L, Nielsen J. 1999. Investigation of the impact of MIG1 and MIG2 on the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 68:197-212.
21. Kohn R, Kovac P. 1978. Dissociation-constants of D-galacturonic and D-glucuronic acid and their O-methyl derivatives. Chem. Zvesti. 32:478-485.
22. Kötter P, Amore R, Hollenberg CP, Ciriacy M. 1990. Isolation and characterization of the Pichia stipitis xylitol dehydrogenase gene, Xyl2, and construction of a xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae transformant. Curr. Genet. 18:493-500.
23. Kötter P, Ciriacy M. 1993. Xylose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38:776 -783.
24. Kuyper M, et al. 2003. High-level functional expression of a fungal xylose isomerase: the key to efficient ethanolic fermentation of xylose by Saccharomyces cerevisiae? FEMS Yeast Res. 4:69 -78.
25. Kuyper M, et al. 2005. Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 5:925-934.
26. Lohr D, Venkov P, Zlatanova J. 1995. Transcriptional regulation in the yeast GAL gene family: a complex genetic network. FASEB J. 9:777-787.
27. Maitra PK. 1971. Glucose and fructose metabolism in a phosphoglucoisomeraseless mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 107:759-769.
28. Mechler K. 1997. Galactose metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a paradigm of eukaryotic gene regulation, p 235. In Zimmermann FK, Entian KD (ed), Yeast sugar metabolism. Technomic, Basel, Switzerland.
29. Micard V, Renard CMGC, Thibault JF. 1996. Enzymatic saccharification of sugar-beet pulp. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 19:162-170.
30. Mohnen D. 2008. Pectin structure and biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11:266-277.
31. Monod J. 1945. Sur la nature du phenomene de diauxie. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 71:37-40.
32. Palmqvist E, Hahn-H ägerdal B. 2000. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II. Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol.74:25-33.
33. Piper P, Calderon CO, Hatzixanthis K, Mollapour M. 2001. Weak acid adaptation: the stress response that confers yeasts with resistance to organic acid food preservatives. Microbiology 147:2635-2642.
34. Platt T. 1984. Toxicity of 2-deoxygalactose to Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells constitutively synthesizing galactose-metabolizing enzymes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:994-996.
35. Postma E, Verduyn C, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. 1989. Enzymic analysis of the Crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:468-477.
36. van Dam JC, et al. 2002. Analysis of glycolytic intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using anion exchange chromatography and electrospray ionization with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 460:209-218.
37. van den Brink J, et al. 2009. Energetic limits to metabolic flexibility: responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to glucose-galactose transitions. Microbiology 155:1340-1350.
38. van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. 1986. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 32:199 -224.
39. van Maris AJA, et al. 2006. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 90:391-418.
40. Van Urk H, Mark PR, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. 1988. Metabolic responses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 8066 and Candida utilis CBS 621 upon transition from glucose limitation to glucose excess. Yeast 4:283-291.
41. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. 1990. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J. Gen. Microbiol. 136:395-403.
42. Wieczorke R, et al. 1999. Concurrent knock-out of at least 20 transporter genes is required to block uptake of hexoses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 464:123-128.
43. Wisselink HW, et al. 2010. Metabolome, transcriptome and metabolic flux analysis of arabinose fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 12:537-551.
44. Wisselink HW, et al. 2007. Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient anaerobic alcoholic fermentation of L-arabinose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4881-4891.
45. Wisselink HW, Toirkens MJ, Wu Q, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. 2009. Novel evolutionary engineering approach for accelerated utilization of glucose, xylose, and arabinose mixtures by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:907-914.
46. Wright J, et al. 2011. Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 11:299-306.
47. Young E, Poucher A, Comer A, Bailey A, Alper H. 2011. Functional survey for heterologous sugar transport proteins, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a host. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:3311-3319.