Designing for participation in educational video games

Assessment in Game-Based Learning: Foundations, Innovations, and Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 401-430

  Hickey, Daniel T ^a   Jameson, Ellen ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84913546021     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (62)

1. Arici, A. B. (2008). Meeting kids at their own game: A comparison of learning and engagement in traditional and 3D MUVE educational gaming contexts.Unpublished dissertation, Departments of Learning and Development Science and Cognitive Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
2. Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher,39(7), 525-536.
3. Barab, S. A., Sadler, T., Heiselt, C., Hickey, D., & Zuiker, S. (2007). Relating narrative, inquiry, and inscriptions: A framework for socio-scientific inquiry. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 59-82.
4. Barab, S., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E. J., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: Relating formalisms and contexts.Science Education, 91(5), 750-782.
5. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
6. Case, R. (1996). Changing views of knowledge and their impact on educational research and practice. In D. Olson & P. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development (pp. 75-99). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
7. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
8. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. T. (2008). Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities.International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 837-861.
10. Danielson, C., & Abrutyn, L. (1997). An introduction to using portfolios in the classroom. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
11. Dondlinger, M. J. (2007). Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 4(1), 21-31.
12. Dourish, P. (2001). Seeking a foundation for context-aware computing. Human Computer Interaction, 16(2), 229-241.
13. Dudai, Y. (1997). How big is human memory, or on being just useful enough. Learning & Memory, 3(5), 341-365.
14. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2006). Overview of research on the educational use of video games. Digital Kompetanse, 1(3), 184-213.
15. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399-483.
16. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
17. Gee, J. P. (2005). Pleasure, learning, video games, and life: The projective stance. In M. Knobel &C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 95-113). New York: Peter Lang.
18. Gee, J. P. (2007). Learning and games. In K. Salen (Ed.), The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning (pp. 21-40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5-17.
20. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. The American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
21. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: Macmillan.
22. Greeno, J. G., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170-199). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gresalfi, M., Barab, S., & Siyahhan, S. (2009). Virtual worlds, conceptual understanding, and me: Designing for consequential engagement. On the Horizon, 17, 21-34.
24. Habib, L., & Wittek, L. (2007). The portfolio as artifact and actor. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14(4), 266-282.
25. Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 401-429.
26. Hickey, D. T., & Anderson, K. T. (2007). Situative approaches to student assessment: Contextualizing evidence to transform practice. In P. Moss (Ed.), Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Evidence and decision making (Vol. 106, Pt. 1, pp. 264-287). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
27. Hickey, D. T., & Filsecker, M. K. (2010). Participatory examination of incentives and competition on engagement and learning in educational video games.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
28. Hickey, D. T., Honeyford, M. A., Clinton, K.A.,& McWilliams, J. (2010). Participatory assessment of 21st century proficiencies. In V. J. Schute & B. Becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment in the 21st century: Supporting educational needs (pp. 107-138). New York: Springer.
29. Hickey, D. T., Ingram-Goble, A. A., & Jameson, E. M. (2009). Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(2), 187-208.
30. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. A. T. (2003). Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment, and evaluation in a technology-supported genetics learning environment. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 495-538.
31. Hickey, D. T., McWilliams, J. C., Bishop, S., & Soylu, F. (2011, April). Participatory design for engagement, understanding, and achievement in university e-learning contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
32. Hickey, D. T., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2005). Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding the connections between transfer and student assessment. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 251-253). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.
33. Hickey, D. T., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Cross, D. (in review). Assessment as learning: Enhancing discourse, understanding, and achievement in innovative science curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching (version accepted for review December 2011).
34. Hickey, D. T., Zuiker, S. J., Taasoobshirazi, G., Schafer, N. J., & Michael, M. A. (2006). Balancing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3), 180-201.
35. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36.
37. Kali, Y. (2006). Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,1(2), 187-201.
38. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers in Education, 55(3), 427-443.
39. Kohn, A. (1996). By all available means: Cameron and Pierce’s defense of extrinsic motivators. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 1-4.
40. Lave, J. (1977). Cognitive consequences of traditional apprenticeship training in West Africa. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 8(3), 177-180.
41. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
43. Lepper, M. R., & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Research on Motivation in Education, 3, 73-105.
44. Lepper, M. R., & Malone, T. W. (1987). Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education. Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3,255-286.
45. McWilliams, J., Hickey, D. T., Hines, M. B., Conner, J. M., & Bishop, S. C. (2011). Using collaborative writing tools for literary analysis: Twitter, fan fiction, and The Crucible in the secondary English classroom. The Journal of Media and Literacy Education, 2(3), 238-245.
46. Mehrens, W. A., & Kaminski, J. (1989). Methods for improving standardized test scores: Fruitful, fruitless, or fraudulent? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 5(1), 14-22.
47. Mehrens, W. A., Popham, W. J., & Ryan, J. M. (1998). How to prepare students for performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,17(1), 18-22.
48. Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13-23.
49. Nolen, S. B., Haladyna, T. M., & Haas, N. S. (1992). Uses and abuses of achievement test scores. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(2), 9-15.
50. Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), Handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching, and schooling (pp. 9-27). Oxford: Blackwell.
51. Pea, R. D., & Sheingold, K. (1987). Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing. Norwalk, CT: Ablex.
52. Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong-and what’s right-with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72-75.
53. Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337-386.
54. Rieber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 549-567). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
55. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A selfdetermination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4),344-360.
56. Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
57. Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 57(2), 104-111.
58. Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (2008). You can’t fatten a hog by weighing it—or can you? Evaluating an assessment system for learning called ACED.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 289-316.
59. Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, 2(1), 49-62.
60. Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching andparticipatory culture in the digital age. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Taasoobshirazi, G., Zuiker, S. J., Anderson, K. T., & Hickey, D. T. (2006). Enhancing inquiry, understanding, and achievement in an astronomy multimedia learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 383-395.
62. Yeh, S. S. (2001). Tests worth teaching to: Constructing state-mandated tests that emphasize critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 12-17.