The portfolio as artifact and actor

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 266-282

  Habib, Laurence ^a   Wittek, Line ^a  

^a OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61149688359     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749030701623763     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping society/buildingsociety: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). London: MIT Press
2. Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1991). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters (pp. 259-264). London: Routledge
3. Barett, H. (2005). Researching electronic portfolios and learner engagement (White Paper for TaskStream, Inc.) REFLECT Initiative. Available from http://electronicportfolios.com/portfolios.html
4. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
5. Chetcuti, D., Murphy, P., & Grima, G. (2006). The formative and summative uses of a professional development portfolio: A Maltese case study. Assessment in Education, 13, 97-112
6. Davies, A., & LeMahieu, P. (2003). Assessment for learning: Reconsidering portfolios and research evidence. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 141-169). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
7. Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Research, 23, 179-198
8. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331-350
9. Dysthe, O., & Engelsen, K. S. (2004). Portfolios and assessment in teacher education in Norway: A theorybased discussion of different models in two sites. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 239-258
10. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387
11. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge
12. Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriated others. In L. Grossberg,C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 295-337). London: Routledge
13. Herman, J. L., & Winters, L. (1994). Portfolio research: A slim collection. Educational Leadership, 52, 48-55
14. Ivarson, J., Schoultz, J., & Säljö, R. (2002). Map reading versus mind reading: Revisiting children's understanding of the shape of the earth. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice (pp. 77-99). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic
15. Johnston, B. (2004). Summative assessment of portfolios: An examination of different approaches to agreement over outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 395-412
16. Klenowski, V. (2002). Developing portfolios for learning and assessment: Processes and principles. London: Routledge Falmer
17. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
18. Latour, B. (1988a). Mixing humans and nonhumans together: The sociology of a door closer. Social Problems, 35, 298-310
19. Latour, B. (1988b). The pasteurization of France. London: Harvard University Press
20. Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103-131). London: Routledge
21. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnological change (pp. 225-259). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
22. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64
23. Latour, B. (1996a). Aramis, or the love of technology. London: Harvard University Press
24. Latour, B. (1996b). Social theory and the study of computerized work sites. In W. J. Orlikowski, G. Walsham, M. R. Jones, & D. J. I. London (Eds.), Information technology and changes in organizational work (pp. 295-307). London: Chapman & Hall
25. Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
26. Miettinen, R. (1999). The riddle of things: Activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 170-195
27. Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools: A socio-cultural perspective on the human-technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144-161). London: Routledge
28. Segers, M., Dochy, F., & Cascallar, E. (2003). The era of assessment engineering: Changing perspectives on teaching and learning and the role of new modes of assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 1-12). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic
29. Smith, K., & Harm, T. (2001). Long-term influences of portfolios on professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 183-203
30. Tigelaar, D. (2005). Design and evaluation of a teaching portfolio. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press
31. Walsham, G. (1997). Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. In A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau, & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 466-480). London: Chapman & Hall
32. Wartofsky, M. W. (1973). Models: Representation and scientific understanding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
33. Wittek, L., & Havnes, A. (2005) Vurderingsformer ved Høgskolen i Oslo [Assessment forms at Oslo University College] (Research Note No. 2005-14). Oslo, Norway: Oslo University College