Changes in species' distributions during and after environmental change: Which eco-evolutionary processes matter more?

Ecography

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1210-1217

  Dytham, Calvin ^a   Travis, Justin M J ^b   Mustin, Karen ^c   Benton, Tim G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912572543     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01194     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson, B. J. et al. 2009. Dynamics of range margins for metapopulations under climate change. - Proc. Biol. Sci. 276: 1415-1420.
2. Araujo, M. B. et al. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. - Global Change Biol. 11: 1504-1513.
3. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2006. Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1712-1728.
4. Barton, K. A. et al. 2012. Risky movement increases the rate of range expansion. - Proc. R. Soc. B 279: 1194-1202.
5. Beaumont, L. J. et al. 2005. Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species' current and future distributions. - Ecol. Model. 186: 251-270.
6. Beckerman, A. et al. 2002. Population dynamic consequences of delayed life-history effects. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 263-269.
7. Benton, T. G. et al. 2006. Complex population dynamics and complex causation: devils, details and demography. - Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 1173-1181.
8. Berry, P. M. et al. 2002. Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11: 453-462.
9. Bocedi, G. et al. 2014. RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 5: 388-396.
10. Bonte, D. et al. 2008. Thermal conditions during juvenile development affect adult dispersal in a spider. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 17000-17005.
11. Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. - Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
12. Bullock, J. M. et al. 2012. Modelling spread of British wind- dispersed plants under future wind speeds in a changing climate. - J. Ecol. 100: 104-115.
13. Burton, O. J. and Travis, J. M. J. 2008. The frequency of fitness peak shifts is increased at expanding range margins due to mutation surfing. - Genetics 179: 941-950.
14. Burton, O. J. et al. 2010. Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion. - Ecol. Lett. 13: 1210-1220.
15. Carroll, S. P. et al. 2007. Evolution on ecological time-scales. - Funct. Ecol. 21: 387-393.
16. Cormont, A. et al. 2011. Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and colonization: significance for dispersal under climate change. - Biodivers. Conserv. 20: 483-503.
17. Crespi, B. J. and Teo, R. 2002. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of semelparity and life history in salmonid fishes. - Evolution 56: 1008-1020.
18. Dawson, T. P. et al. 2011. Beyond predictions: biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. - Science 332: 53-58.
19. Engler, R. and Guisan, A. 2009. MigClim: predicting plant distribution and dispersal in a changing climate. - Divers. Distrib. 15: 590-601.
20. Erfmeier, A. et al. 2010. Secondary invasion of Acer negundo: the role of phenotypic responses versus local adaptation. - Biol. Invasions 13: 1599-1614.
21. Evans, M. R. et al. 2012. Predictive ecology: systems approaches. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367: 163-169.
22. Excoffier, L. et al. 2009. Genetic consequences of range expansions. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 481-501.
23. FAO 2007. - Food and Agricultural Organistaion of the United Nations.
24. Foresight 2011. The future of food and farming: challenges and choices for global sustainability. - The Government Office for Science, London.
25. Gibbs, M. et al. 2011. Phenotypic plasticity in butterfly morphology in response to weather conditions during development. - J. Zool. 283: 162-168.
26. Hendry, A. P. et al. 2010. Evolutionary biology in biodiversity science, conservation, and policy: a call to action. - Evolution 64: 1517-1528.
27. Hodgson, J. A. et al. 2012. The speed of range shifts in fragmented landscapes. - PLoS One 7: e47141.
28. Kim, E. and Donohue, K. 2012. The effect of plant architecture on drought resistance: implications for the evolution of semelparity in Erysimum capitatum. - Funct. Ecol. 26: 294-303.
29. Lambrinos, J. G. 2004. How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. - Ecology 85: 2061-2070.
30. Lande, R. 2014. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity and environmental tolerance of a labile quantitaive character in a fluctuating environment. - J. Evol. Biol. 27: 866-875.
31. Léotard, G. et al. 2009. Range expansion drives dispersal evolution in an equatorial three-species symbiosis. - PLoS One 4: e5377.
32. McInerny, G. et al. 2007. Range shifting on a fragmented landscape. - Ecol. Inform. 2: 1-8.
33. McInerny, G. J. et al. 2009. How range shifts induced by climate change affect neutral evolution. - Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 1527-1534.
34. Midgley, G. F. et al. 2010. BioMove - an integrated platform simulating the dynamic response of species to environmental change. - Ecography 33: 612-616.
35. Moloney, K. A. et al. 2008. Evidence for a shift in life-history strategy during the secondary phase of a plant invasion. - Biol. Invasions 11: 625-634.
36. Mustin, K. et al. 2008. The dynamics of climate-induced range shifting; perspectives from simulation modelling. - Oikos 118: 131-137.
37. Nathan, R. et al. 2011. Spread of North American wind-dispersed trees in future environments. - Ecol. Lett. 14: 211-219.
38. Parmesan, C. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37: 637-669.
39. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1704-1711.
40. Phillips, B. L. et al. 2008. Reid's paradox revisited: the evolution of dispersal kernels during range expansion. - Am. Nat. 172: S34-S48.
41. Phillips, B. L. et al. 2010a. Life-history evolution in range-shifting populations. - Ecology 91: 1617-1627.
42. Phillips, B. L. et al. 2010b. Evolutionarily accelerated invasions: the rate of dispersal evolves upwards during the range advance of cane toads. - J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2595-2601.
43. Plaistow, S. J. and Benton, T. G. 2009. The influence of context-dependent maternal effects on population dynamics: an experimental test. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364: 1049-1058.
44. Ranta, E. et al. 2000. Does evolution of iteroparous and semelparous reproduction call for spatially structured systems? - Evolution 54: 145-150.
45. Ranta, E. et al. 2002. Environmental Variability and semelparity vs. iteroparity as life histories. - J. Theor. Biol. 217: 391-396.
46. Simmons, A. D. and Thomas, C. D. 2004. Changes in dispersal during species' range expansions. - Am. Nat. 164: 378-395.
47. Solomon, S. et al. 2007. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
48. Stevens, V. M. et al. 2010. A meta-analysis of dispersal in butterflies. - Biol. Rev. 85: 625-642.
49. Tilman, D. et al. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108: 20260-20264.
50. Trakhtenbrot, A. et al. 2005. The importance of long-distance dispersal in biodiversity conservation. - Divers. Distrib. 11: 173-181.
51. Travis, J. M. J. 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail. - Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 467-473.
52. Travis, J. M. J. and Dytham, C. 2002. Dispersal evolution during invasions. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 1119-1129.
53. Travis, J. M. J. et al. 2007. Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. - Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 2334-2343.
54. Travis, J. M. J. et al. 2009. Accelerating invasion rates result from the evolution of density-dependent dispersal. - J. Theor. Biol. 259: 151-158.
55. Weeks, A. R. et al. 2011. Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective. - Evol. Appl. 4: 709-725.
56. Wiens, J. A. et al. 2009. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. - Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106 (Suppl.): 19729-19736.
57. Willis, S. G. et al. 2009. Dynamic distribution modelling: predicting the present from the past. - Ecography 32: 5-12.
58. Wilson, R. J. et al. 2005. Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 1138-1146.
59. Zurell, D. et al. 2012. Uncertainty in predictions of range dynamics: black grouse climbing the Swiss Alps. - Ecography 35: 590-603.