Secondary invasion of Acer negundo: The role of phenotypic responses versus local adaptation

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1599-1614

  Erfmeier, Alexandra ^a   Böhnke, Martin ^a   Bruelheide, Helge ^a  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITY HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecotypes; Germination velocity; Leaf life span; Reciprocal transplant experiment; RGR; Secondary phase of invasion

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOTYPE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENE FLOW; GERMINATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT TYPE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LOCAL ADAPTATION; NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION DENSITY; RANGE EXPANSION; RECIPROCITY; REGENERATION; SEX RATIO; SOIL MOISTURE;

GERMANY; HALLE; SAXONY-ANHALT;

ACER; ACER NEGUNDO;

EID: 79957971175     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9917-2     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD (1970) Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25: 349-365.
2. Antonovics J, Primack RB (1982) Experimental ecological genetics in Plantago-VI. The demography of seedling transplants of P. lanceolata. J Ecol 70: 55-75.
3. Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York, pp 147-172.
4. Barrett SCH, Richardson BJ (1986) Genetic attributes of invading species. In: Groves RH, Burdon JJ (eds) Ecology of biological invasions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21-33.
5. Bennington CC, McGraw JB (1995) Natural selection and ecotypic differentiation in Impatiens pallida. Ecol Monogr 65: 303-323.
6. Berendse F, Braakhekke W, van der Krift T (1998) Adaptations of plant populations to nutrient-poor environments and their implications for soil nutrient mineralisation. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 503-514.
7. Blair AC, Wolfe LM (2004) The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85: 3035-3042.
8. Brown JS, Eckert CG (2005) Evolutionary increase in sexual and clonal reproductive capacity during biological invasion in an aquatic plant Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae). Am J Bot 92: 495-502.
9. Brunner E, Puri ML (2001) Nonparametric methods in factorial designs. Statistical papers 42: 1-52.
10. Chabot BF, Hicks DJ (1982) The ecology of leaf life spans. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13: 229-259.
11. Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11: 233-260.
12. Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230: 895-899.
13. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Díaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG, Poorter H (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51: 335-380.
14. Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR (1993) Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74: 798-815.
15. Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999) Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: Geber MA, Dawson TE, Delph LF (eds) Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 175-215.
16. Dawson TE, Ward JK, Ehleringer JR (2004) Temporal scaling of physiological response from gas exchange to tree rings: a gender-specific study of Acer negundo (Boxelder) growing under different conditions. Funct Ecol 18: 212-222.
17. Dietz H, Edwards PJ (2006) Recognition that causal processes change during plant invasion helps explain conflicts in evidence. Ecology 87: 1359-1367.
18. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecol Lett 11: 701-709.
19. Ellstrand NC, Schierenbeck KA (2000) Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc Nat Acad Sci US 97: 7043-7050.
20. Eränen JK, Nilsen J, Zverev VE, Kozlov MV (2009) Mountain birch under multiple stressors-heay-metal resistant populations co-resistant to biotic stress but maladapted to abiotic stress. J Evol Biol 22: 840-851.
21. Erfmeier A, Bruelheide H (2005) Invasive and native Rhododendron ponticum populations: Is there evidence for genotypic differences in germination and growth? Ecography 28: 417-428.
22. Erfmeier A, Bruelheide H (2010) Invasibility or invasiveness? Effects of habitat, genotype, and their interaction on invasive Rhododendron ponticum populations. Biol Invasions 12: 657-676.
23. Facon B, Genton BJ, Shykoff JA, Jarne P, Estoup A, David P (2006) A general eco-evolutionary framework for understanding bioinvasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21: 130-135.
24. Farris MA (1987) Natural selection on the plant-water relations of Cleome serrulata growing along natural moisture gradients. Oecologia 72: 434-439.
25. Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harper KT (1976) Differential resource utilization by sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193: 597-599.
27. Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Chichester, Wiley.
28. 2, assimilation, growth and survivorship. Oecologia 70: 198-204.
29. Hacker JB (1984) Genetic variation in seed dormancy in Digitaria milanjiana in relation to rainfall at the collection site. J Appl Ecol 21: 947-959.
30. Hacker JB, Ratcliff D (1989) Seed dormancy and factors controlling dormancy breakdown in buffel grass accessions from contrasting provenances. J Appl Ecol 26: 201-212.
31. Hänfling B, Kollmann J (2002) An evolutionary perspective of biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 545-546.
32. Hedrick PW (2005) Genetics of populations. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, Massachusetts.
33. Huang X, Schmitt J, Dorn L, Griffith C, Effgen S, Takao S, Koorneef M, Donohue K (2010) The earliest stages of adaptation in an experimental plant population: strong selection on QTLS for seed dormancy. Mol Ecol 19: 1335-1351.
34. Hunt R (1989) Basic growth analysis. Unwin Hyman, London.
35. Jäger EJ (1975) Wo liegen die Grenzen der Kulturareale von Pflanzen? Möglichkeiten der Beobachtung in Botanischen Gärten. Wissenschaftliche Beiträge MLU Halle-Wittenberg 6: 101-113.
36. Jain SK, Bradshaw AD (1966) Evolutionary divergence among adjacent plant populations. Heredity 21: 407-441.
37. Jonas CJ, Geber MA (1999) Variation among populations of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae) along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. Am J Bot 86: 333-343.
38. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7: 1225-1241.
39. Kikuzawa K (2003) Phenological and morphological adaptations to the light environment in two woody and two herbaceous plant species. Funct Ecol 17: 29-38.
40. King DA (1994) Influence of light level on the growth and morphology of saplings in a Panamanian forest. Am J Bot 81: 948-957.
41. Kowarik I (2003) Biologische Invasionen: Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
42. Lambrinos JG (2004) How interactions between ecology and evolution influence contemporary invasion dynamics. Ecology 85: 2061-2070.
43. Lavergne S, Molofsky J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 3883-3888.
44. Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 386-391.
45. Leger EA, Rice KJ (2003) Invasive California poppies (Eschscholzia californica Cham.) grow larger than native individuals under reduced competition. Ecol Lett 6: 257-264.
46. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS System for mixed models, 1st edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North C.
47. Little EL Jr (1971) Atlas of US trees, vol. 1-Conifers and important hardwoods. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.
48. Little EL Jr (1979) Checklist of United States Trees (native and naturalized). Agriculture Handbook 541. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D. C, p 375.
49. Maeglin RR, Ohman LF (1973) Boxelder (Acer negundo): A review and commentary. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 100: 357-363.
50. Maron JL, Elmendorf SC, Vilà M (2007) Contrasting plant physiological adaptation to climate change in the native and introduced range of Hypericum perforatum. Evolution 61: 1912-1924.
51. McGraw JB, Antonovics J (1983) Experimental ecology of Dryas octopetala ecotypes I. Ecotypic differentiation and life-cycle stages of selection. J Ecol 71: 879-897.
52. McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 285-291.
53. Meyer GH, Hull-Sanders HM (2008) Altered patterns of growth, physiology and reproduction in invasive genotypes of Solidago gigantea (Asteraceae). Biol Invasions 10: 303-317.
54. Meyer SE, Pendleton BK (2005) Factors affecting seed germination and seedling establishment of a long-lived desert shrub (Coleogyne ramosissima: Rosaceae). Plant Ecol 178: 171-187.
55. Milbau A, Nijs I, van Peer L, Reheul D, De Cauwer B (2003) Disentangling invasiveness and invasibility during invasion in synthesized grassland communities. New Phytol 159: 657-667.
56. Moloney KA, Knaus F, Dietz H (2009) Evidence for a shift in life-history strategy during the secondary phase of a plant invasion. Biol Invasions 11: 625-634.
57. Moyers BT, Kane NC (2010) The genetics of adaptation to novel environments: selection on germination timing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Ecol 19: 1270-1272.
58. Novak SJ (2007) The role of evolution in the invasion process. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 3671-3672.
59. Parker IM, Rodriguez J, Loik ME (2003) An evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions: local adaptation and general-purpose genotypes in the weed Verbascum thapsus. Conserv Biol 17: 59-72.
60. Poorter L, Bongers F (2006) Leaf traits are good predictors of plant performance across 53 rain forest species. Ecology 87: 1733-1743.
61. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. University Press, Cambridge.
62. Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62: 365-392.
63. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9: 981-993.
64. Roloff A (2006) Flora der Gehölze. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
65. Ross MA, Harper JL (1972) Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J Ecol 60: 77-88.
66. Rothmaler W (1972) Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD - Gefäßpflanzen, 7th edn. Volk und Wissen, Berlin.
67. Rothmaler W (1984) Exkursionsflora für die Gebiete der DDR und der BRD - Gefäßpflanzen, 12th edn. Volk und Wissen, Berlin.
68. Rothmaler W (2005) Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. In: Jäger EJ, Werner K (eds) Gefäßpflanzen: Kritischer Band. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
69. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 32: 305-332.
70. Sambatti JBM, Rice KJ (2007) Functional ecology of ecotypic differentiation in the Californian serpentine sunflower (Helianthus exilis). New Phytol 175: 107-119.
71. SAS Institute (2000) SAS Procedures Guide. Cary, North Carolina.
72. Savolainen O, Pyhäjärvi T, Knürr T (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38: 595-619.
73. Sexton JP, McKay JK, Sala A (2002) Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol Appl 12: 1652-1660.
74. Siemann E, Rogers WE (2001) Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecol Lett 4: 514-518.
75. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 393-430.
76. Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecol Lett 9: 357-374.
77. Theoharides KA, Dukes JS (2007) Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 176: 256-273.
78. Volis S, Mendlinger S, Ward D (2002) Differentiation in populations of Hordeum spontaneum along a gradient of environmental productivity and predictability: life history and local adaptation. Biol J Linn Soc 77: 479-490.
79. von Schlechtendahl DFL (1884) Flora von Deutschland. Fr. Eugen Köhler, Gera.
80. Weber E (2003) Invasive plant species of the world. A reference guide to environmental weeds. CABI Publishing, Oxon.
81. Weber E, Schmid B (1998) Latitudinal population differentiation in two species of Solidago (Asteraceae) introduced into Europe. Am J Bot 85: 1110-1121.
82. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles A, Vesk PA, Wrigth IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 33: 125-159.
83. Whitney KD, Gabler CA (2008) Rapid evolution in introduced species, 'invasive traits' and recipient communities: challenges for predicting invasive potential. Divers Distr 14: 569-580.
84. Wright IJ, Westoby M, Reich PB (2002) Convergence towards higher leaf mass per area in dry and nutrient-poor habitats has different consequences for leaf life span. J Ecol 90: 534-543.