The dynamics of climate-induced range shifting; perspectives from simulation modelling

Oikos

Volumn 118, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 131-137

  Mustin, Karen ^a   Benton, Tim G ^b   Dytham, Calvin ^c,d   Travis, Justin M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; MOVEMENT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANGE EXPANSION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL VARIATION;

EID: 58149108975     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17025.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change Global Change Biol. 11 : 1504 1513.
2. Baguette, M. et al. 2000. Population spatial structure and migration of three butterfly species within the same habitat network: consequences for conservation J. Appl. Ecol. 37 : 100 108.
3. Berry, P. M. et al. 2002. Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 11 : 453 462.
4. Best, A. S. et al. 2007. Which species will successfully track climate change? The influence of intraspecific competition and density dependent dispersal on range shifting dynamics Oikos 116 : 1531 1539.
5. Carey, P. D. 1996. Disperse: a cellular automaton for predicting the distribution of species in a changed climate Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 5 : 217 226.
6. Guisan, A. Thuiller, W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models Ecol. Lett. 8 : 993 1009.
7. Hampe, A. 2004. Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 13 : 469 476.
8. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics J. Anim. Ecol. 63 : 151 162.
9. Hanski, I. 1998. Metapopulation dynamics Nature 396 : 41 49.
10. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press.
11. Heikkinen, R. K. et al. 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30 : 751 777.
12. Hill, J. K. et al. 2002. Responses of butterflies to twentieth century climate warming: implications for future ranges Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 2163 2171.
13. Holt, R. D. Keitt, T. H. 2000. Alternative causes for range limits: a metapopulation perspective Ecol. Lett. 3 : 41 47.
14. Lahaye, W. S. et al. 1994. Spotted owl metapopulation dynamics in southern California J. Anim. Ecol. 63 : 775 785.
15. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15 : 237 240.
16. Marsh, D. M. Trenham, P. C. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation Conserv. Biol. 15 : 40 49.
17. Maynard Smith, J. Slatkin, M. 1973. The stability of predator-prey systems Ecology 54 : 384 391.
18. McInerny, G. et al. 2007. Range shifting on a fragmented landscape Ecol. Inf. 2 : 1 8.
19. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2002. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species Ecol. Modell. 154 : 289 300.
20. Simmons, A. D. Thomas, C. D. 2004. Changes in dispersal during species' range expansions Am. Nat. 164 : 378 395.
21. Sykes, M. T. et al. 1996. A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates J. Biogeogr. 23 : 203 233.
22. Thuiller, W. 2003. BIOMOD-Optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change Global Change Biol. 9 : 1353 1362.
23. Travis, J. M. J. 2003. Climate change and habitat destruction: a deadly anthropogenic cocktail Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270 : 467 473.
24. Travis, J. M. J. Dytham, C. 2002. Dispersal evolution during invasions Evol. Ecol. Res. 8 : 1119 1129.
25. With, K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread Conserv. Biol. 16 : 1192 1203.