Erratum to: Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products (Journal of Business Ethics, DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2485-0);Corporate Socially Responsible Initiatives and Their Effects on Consumption of Green Products

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 253-264

  Romani, Simona ^a   Grappi, Silvia ^b   Bagozzi, Richard P ^c  

^a LUISS UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Extrinsic and intrinsic motives of corporations; Moral elevation; Skepticism; Socially responsible consumption

Indexed keywords

EID: 84912571375     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2541-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (50)

1. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.
2. Aquino, K., McFerran, B., & Laven, M. (2011). Moral identity and the experience of moral elevation in response to acts of uncommon goodness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 701–718.
3. Arenas, D., Lozano, J. M., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 175–197.
4. Babin, B. J., Boles, J. S., & Darden, W. R. (1995). Salesperson stereotypes, consumer emotions, and their impact on information processing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 94–105.
5. Bagozzi, R. P., Bergami, M., Marzocchi, G. L., & Morandin, G. (2012). Customer–organization relationships: Development and test of a theory of extended identities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 63–76.
6. Bhattacharya, C. B., Korschun, D., & Sen, S. (2009). Strengthening stakeholder–company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 257–272.
7. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
8. Botto, S. (2009). Tap water vs. mineral water in a footprint integrated approach. Retrieved, from Nature Precedings: http://precedings.nature.com/documents/3407/version/1.
9. Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Rose, G. M. (1994). Adolescent skepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 165–175.
10. Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Gatersleben, B. (2012). The moral circle as a common motivational cause of cross-situational pro-environmentalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(5), 539–545.
11. Cox, K. S. (2010). Elevation predicts domain-specific volunteerism 3 months later. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(5), 333–341.
12. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.
13. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.
14. Du, S., Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2008). Exploring the social and business returns of a corporate oral health initiative aimed at disadvantaged Hispanic families. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 483–494.
15. Ellen, P. S., Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (2006). Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147–157.
16. Forehand, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356.
17. Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31.
18. Gourville, J. T., & Rangan, K. V. (2004). Valuing the cause marketing relationship. California Management Review, 47(Fall), 38–58.
19. Grappi, S., Romani, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2013). The effects of company offshoring strategies on consumer responses. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(6), 683–704.
20. Haidt, J. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In C. L. M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. I. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457–501.
23. Konga, N., Salzmannb, O., Stegerb, U., & Ionescu-Somersb, A. (2002). Moving business/industry towards sustainable consumption: The role of NGOs. European Management Journal, 20(2), 109–127.
24. Lacasse, K. (2013). Addressing the “go green” debate: policies that encourage small green behaviors and their political spillover effects. The Journal of Science Policy and Governance, 3(1), 1–32.
25. Laham, S. (2009). Expanding the moral circle: Inclusion and exclusion mind-sets and the circle of moral regard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 250–253.
26. Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321–352.
27. Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (2006). Social exchange theory of emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 295–320). New York: Springer.
28. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2006). Commitment in structurally enabled and induced exchange relations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 183–200.
29. Lawler, E. J., Thye, S. R., & Yoon, J. (2008). Social exchange and micro social order. American Sociological Review, 73(4), 519–542.
30. Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(2), 87–96.
31. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16–32.
32. Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998). Development of a scale to measure consumer scepticism toward advertising. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(2), 159–186.
33. Parguel, B., Benoit-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(1), 15–28.
34. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 125–140.
35. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
36. Reed, A, I. I., & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard towards outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286.
37. Romani, S., & Grappi, S. (2014). How companies’ good deeds encourage consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), 8.
38. Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2013). Explaining consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of gratitude and altruistic values. Journal of Business Ethnics, 114(2), 193–206.
39. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.
40. Schnall, S., Roper, J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2010). Elevation leads to altruistic behavior, above and beyond general positive affect. Psychological Science, 21(3), 315–320.
41. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.
42. Singh, S., Kristensen, L., & Villasenor, E. (2009). Overcoming skepticism toward cause related claims: The case of Norway. International Marketing Review, 26(3), 312–326.
43. Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838.
44. Taylor, V. A., Halstead, D., & Haynes, P. J. (2010). Consumer responses to christian religious symbols in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 32(2), 79–92.
45. Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 93–103.
46. Thøgersen, J., & Olander, F. (2006). To what degree are environmentally beneficial choices reflective of a general conservation stance? Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 550–569.
47. Vanhamme, J., & Grobben, B. (2009). Too good to be true!: The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 273–283.
48. Weiner, B. (2000). Attributional thoughts about consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 382–387.
49. Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314.
50. Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organizational Science, 9(2), 141–159.