Workshop report: Identifying opportunities for global integration of toxicogenomics databases, 26–27 June 2013, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

Archives of Toxicology

Volumn 88, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2323-2332

  Hendrickx, Diana M ^a,b   Boyles, Rebecca R ^c   Kleinjans, Jos C S ^a,b   Dearry, Allen ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b National Institutes of Health ^*  (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Data sharing; Databases; Hazard identification; Human; Omics technologies; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; MESSENGER RNA; DANGEROUS GOODS; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INTERACTION; GENOMICS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOGENETICS; ANIMAL; DANGEROUS GOODS; DRUG EFFECTS; GENETIC DATABASE; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PROCEDURES; TOXICITY; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES (U.S.); NORTH CAROLINA; TOXICOGENETICS; TRANSCRIPTOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84912570700     PISSN: 03405761     EISSN: 14320738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-014-1387-3     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Benfenati E, Gini G, Hoffmann S, Luttik R (2010) Comparing in vivo, in vitro and in silico methods and integrated strategies for chemical assessment: problems and prospects. Altern Lab Anim 38(2):153–166
2. Berg N, De Wever B, Fuchs HW, Gaca M, Krul C, Roggen EL (2011) Toxicology in the 21st century—working our way towards a visionary reality. Toxicol In Vitro 25(4):874–881
3. Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access (2010) Sustainable economics for a digital planet: ensuring long-term access to digital information. In: Rumsey AS (ed) Blue Ribbon Task Force on Sustainable Digital Preservation and Access, p 110
4. Briggs K, Cases M, Heard DJ et al (2012) Inroads to predict in vivo toxicology—an introduction to the eTOX project. Int J Mol Sci 13(3):3820–3846
5. Caiment F, Tsamou M, Jennen D, Kleinjans J (2014) Assessing compound carcinogenicity in vitro using connectivity mapping. Carcinogenesis 35(1):201–207
6. Chambers J, Davies M, Gaulton A et al (2013) UniChem: a unified chemical structure cross-referencing and identifier tracking system. J Cheminform 5(1):3
7. Chen MJ, Zhang M, Borlak J, Tong WD (2012) A decade of toxicogenomic research and its contribution to toxicological science. Toxicol Sci 130(2):217–228
8. Christensen SW, Brandt CC, McCracken MK (2011) Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program. Environ Manag 47(6):1112–1124
9. Davis AP, Murphy CG, Saraceni-Richards CA, Rosenstein MC, Wiegers TC, Mattingly CJ (2009) Comparative Toxicogenomics Database: a knowledgebase and discovery tool for chemical-gene-disease networks. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database issue):D786–D792
10. Davis AP, Wiegers TC, Rosenstein MC, Mattingly CJ (2012) MEDIC: a practical disease vocabulary used at the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. Database (Oxford) 2012:bar065
11. Davis AP, Murphy CG, Johnson R et al (2013) The comparative toxicogenomics database: update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 41(Database issue):D1104–D1114
12. Edwards SW, Preston RJ (2008) Systems biology and mode of action based risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 106(2):312–318
13. European Commission (2007) REACH—Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/chemicals/reach/index_en.htm. Accessed 12 Sept 2013
14. European Commission (2010a) A digital agenda for Europe. Communication from the Commission
15. European Commission (2010b) EU Council Directive (76/768/EEC). http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/sectors/cosmetics/documents/directive/#h2-consolidated-version-of-cosmetics-directive-76/768/eec. Accessed 12 Sept 2013
16. Fielden MR, Halbert DN (2007) Iconix Biosciences, Inc. Pharmacogenomics 8(4):401–405
17. Fostel J, Choi D, Zwickl C et al (2005) Chemical effects in biological systems–data dictionary (CEBS-DD): a compendium of terms for the capture and integration of biological study design description, conventional phenotypes, and ‘omics data. Toxicol Sci 88(2):585–601
18. Ganter B, Snyder RD, Halbert DN, Lee MD (2006) Toxicogenomics in drug discovery and development: mechanistic analysis of compound/class-dependent effects using the DrugMatrix database. Pharmacogenomics 7(7):1025–1044
19. Gaulton A, Bellis LJ, Bento AP et al (2012) ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 40(Database issue):D1100–D1107
20. Hartung T (2009) Toxicology for the twenty-first century. Nature 460(7252):208–212
21. Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D et al (2006) The connectivity map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 313(5795):1929–1935
22. Mattingly CJ, McKone TE, Callahan MA, Blake JA, Hubal EA (2012) Providing the missing link: the exposure science ontology ExO. Environ Sci Technol 46(6):3046–3053
23. National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21th Century: a vision and a strategy. National Academy Press, Washington
24. Noriyuki N, Igarashi Y, Ono A, Yamada H, Ohno Y, Urushidani T (2012) Evaluation of DNA microarray results in the Toxicogenomics Project (TGP) consortium in Japan. J Toxicol Sci 37(4):791–801
25. Nystrom-Persson J, Igarashi Y, Ito M et al (2013) Toxygates: interactive toxicity analysis on a hybrid microarray and linked data platform. Bioinformatics 29(23):3080–3086
26. Rocca-Serra P, Brandizi M, Maguire E et al (2010) ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level. Bioinformatics 26(18):2354–2356
27. Sansone SA, Rocca-Serra P, Field D et al (2012) Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet 44(2):121–126
28. Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD et al (2006) The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 24(9):1151–1161
29. Shi L, Campbell G, Jones WD et al (2010) The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive models. Nat Biotechnol 28(8):827–838
30. Sycheva LP, Zhurkov VS, Rakhmanin YA (2013) Actual problems of genetic toxicology. Russ J Genet 49(3):255–262
31. Wang C, Gong B, Bushel PR et al (2014) The concordance between RNA-seq and microarray data depends on chemical treatment and transcript abundance. Nat Biotechnol 32(9):926–932
32. Warr W (2009) ChEMBL—an interview with John Overington, team leader, chemogenomics at the European Bioinformatics Institute outstation of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL-EBI). J Comput Aid Mol Des 23(4):195–198
33. Waters M, Yauk C (2007) Consensus recommendations to promote and advance predictive systems toxicology and toxicogenomics. Environ Mol Mutagen 48(5):400–403
34. Waters M, Stasiewicz S, Merrick BA et al (2008) CEBS—Chemical Effects in Biological Systems: a public data repository integrating study design and toxicity data with microarray and proteomics data. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D892–D900
35. Woodall GM, Goldberg RB (2008) Summary of the workshop on the power of aggregated toxicity data. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 233(1):71–75