Development and in vitro evaluation of a buccal drug delivery system based on preactivated thiolated pectin

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 40, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 1530-1537

  Hauptstein, Sabine ^a   Hintzen, Fabian ^a   Müller, Christiane ^a   Ohm, Moritz ^a   Bernkop Schnürch, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Buccal application; Gel; Lidocaine; Pectin; Preactivated thiomer

Indexed keywords

LIDOCAINE; PECTIN; THIOL GROUP; THIOLATED PECTIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 2-MERCAPTONICOTINIC ACID; CYSTEINE; GEL; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; NICOTINIC ACID DERIVATIVE; THIOL DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL TISSUE; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; BUCCAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; CELL VIABILITY ASSAY; CHEMICAL MODIFICATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ADMINISTRATION ROUTE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG RELEASE; DRUG RETENTION; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG SOLUBILITY; DRUG STABILITY; DRUG SYNTHESIS; FLOW KINETICS; GEL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMEDIATE DRUG RELEASE; IN VITRO STUDY; MUCOADHESION; NONHUMAN; SUSTAINED DRUG RELEASE; THIOLATION; VISCOSITY; WATER ABSORPTION; ANIMAL; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY; MOUTH MUCOSA; PIG;

ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; CYSTEINE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; GELS; LIDOCAINE; MOUTH MUCOSA; NICOTINIC ACIDS; PECTINS; RHEOLOGY; SULFHYDRYL COMPOUNDS; SWINE;

EID: 84911461922     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: 15205762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03639045.2013.836213     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Shojaei AH. Buccal mucosa as a route for systemic drug delivery: a review. J Pharm Pharm Sci 1998;1:15-30
2. Salamat-Miller N, Chittchang M, Johnston TP. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1666-91
3. Shearn MA. Sjögrens syndrome. Semin Arthrit Rheumat 1972;2: 165-90
4. Kapil R, Dhawan S, Beg S, Singh B. Buccoadhesive films for oncea-day administration of rivastigmine: systematic formulation Development and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013; 39:466-80
5. Lee JW, Park JH, Robinson JR. Bioadhesive-based dosage forms: the next generation. J Pharm Sci 2000;89:850-66
6. Park DM, Song YK, Jee JP, et al. Development of chitosan-based ondansetron buccal delivery system for the treatment of emesis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2012;38:1077-83
7. Hoare TR, Kohane DS. Hydrogels in Drug delivery: progress and challenges. Polymer 2008;49:1993-2007
8. Castile J, Cheng YH, Simmons B, et al. Development of in vitro models to demonstrate the ability of PecSys, an in situ nasal gelling technology, to reduce nasal run-off and drip. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2013;39:816-24
9. Majzoob S, Atyabi F, Dorkoosh F, et al. Pectin-cysteine conjugate: synthesis and in-vitro evaluation of its potential for drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol 2006;58:1601-10
10. Perera G, Hombach J, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Hydrophobic thiolation of pectin with 4-Aminothiophenol: synthesis and in vitro characterization. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11:174-80
11. Perera G, Barthelmes J, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Novel pectin-4-Aminothiophenole conjugate microparticles for colon-specific drug delivery. J Control Release 2010;145:240-6
12. Hintzen F, Laffleur F, Sakloetsakun D, et al. In situ gelling properties of anionic thiomers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2012;38: 1479-85
13. Iqbal J, Shahnaz G, Dünnhaupt S, et al. Preactivated thiomers as mucoadhesive polymers for drug delivery. Biomaterials 2012;33: 1528-35
14. Dünnhaupt S, Barthelmes J, Thurner CC, et al. S-protected thiolated chitosan: synthesis and in vitro characterization. Carbohydr Polym 2012;9:765-72
15. Dünnhaupt S, Barthelmes J, Rahmat D, et al. S-Protected thiolated chitosan for oral delivery of hydrophilic macromolecules: evaluation of permeation enhancing and efflux pump inhibitory properties. Mol Pharm 2012;90:765-72
16. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Schwarz V, Steininger S. Polymers with thiol groups: a new generation of mucoadhesive polymers? Pharm Res 1999;16:876-81
17. Tan YT, Peh KK, Al-Hanbali O. Effect of Carbopol and polyvinylpyrrolidone on the mechanical, rheological, and release properties of bioadhesive polyethylene glycol gels. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2000;1:E24
18. Marschutz MK, BernkopSchnürch A. Thiolated polymers: self-crosslinking properties of thiolated 450 kDa poly(acrylic acid) and their influence on mucoadhesion. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002;15: 387-94
19. Bernkop-Schnürch A, Kast CE, Richter MF. Improvement in the mucoadhesive properties of alginate by the covalent attachment of cysteine. J Control Release: Off J Control Release Soc 2001;71: 277-85
20. Martin L, Wilson CG, Koosha F, Uchegbu IF. Sustained buccal delivery of the hydrophobic drug denbufylline using physically cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;55:35-45
21. Kast CE, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiolated polymers-Thiomers: development and in vitro evaluation of chitosan-Thioglycolic acid conjugates. Biomaterials 2001;22:2345-52
22. Leitner VM, Marschutz MK, Bernkop-Schnurch A. Mucoadhesive and cohesive properties of poly(acrylic acid)-cysteine conjugates with regard to their molecular mass. Eur J Pharm Sci 2003;18: 89-96
23. Hombach J, Palmberger TF, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Development and in vitro evaluation of a mucoadhesive vaginal delivery system for nystatin. J Pharm Sci 2009;98:555-64
24. Rao KVR, Buri P. A novel in situ method to test polymers and coated microparticles for bioadhesion. Int J Pharmaceut 1989;52: 265-70
25. Plumb JA. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol Med 2004;88:165-9
26. Plumb JA. Cell sensitivity assays: the MTT assay. Methods Mol Med 1999;28:25-30
27. Kelly HM, Deasy PB, Busquet M, Torrance AA. Bioadhesive, rheological, lubricant and other aspects of an oral gel formulation intended for the treatment of xerostomia. Int J Pharm 2004;278: 391-406
28. Liu L, Fishman ML, Kost J, Hicks KB. Pectin-based systems for colon-specific drug delivery via oral route. Biomaterials 2003;24: 3333-43
29. Pang, Y. Neue Funktionspolymere für die wässrige Phase [PhD thesis]. Düsseldorf, Germany: Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf; 2005
30. Aksungur P, Sungur A, Unal S, et al. Chitosan Delivery systems for the treatment of oral mucositis: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Control Release 2004;98:269-79
31. Hagesaether E, Sande SA. In vitro measurements of mucoadhesive properties of six types of pectin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2007;33: 417-25
32. Smart JD, Kellaway IW, Worthington HEC. An in-vitro investigation of mucosa-Adhesive materials for use in controlled drug delivery. J Pharmacy Pharmacol 1984;36:295-9
33. Thirawong N, Kennedy RA, Sriamornsak P. Viscometric study of pectin-mucin interaction and its mucoadhesive bond strength. Carbohydr Polym 2008;71:170-9
34. Leitner VM, Walker GF, Bernkop-Schnürch A. Thiolated polymers: evidence for the formation of disulphide bonds with mucus glycoproteins. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2003;56:207-14
35. Perez-Vilar J, Mabolo R. Gel-forming mucins. Notions from in vitro studies. Histol Histopathol 2007;22:455-64
36. Carlsson J, Drevin H, Axén R. Protein thiolation and reversible protein-protein conjugation. N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate, a new heterobifunctional reagent. Biochem J 1978;173: 723-37
37. Norris R, Brocklehurst K. A convenient method of preparation of high-Activity urease from Canavalia ensiformis by covalent chromatography and an investigation of its thiol groups with 2,20-dipyridyl disulphide as a thiol titrant and reactivity probe. Biochem J 1976;159:245-57
38. Hassan EE, Gallo JM. A simple rheological method for the in vitro assessment of mucin-polymer bioadhesive bond strength. Pharm Res 1990;7:491-5
39. Smart JD. The basics and underlying mechanisms of mucoadhesion. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2005;57:1556-68
40. Madsen F, Eberth K, Smart JD. A rheological assessment of the nature of interactions between mucoadhesive polymers and a homogenised mucus gel. Biomaterials 1998;19:1083-92
41. Kocevar-Nared J, Kristl J, Smid-Korbar J. Comparative rheological investigation of crude gastric mucin and natural gastric mucus. Biomaterials 1997;18:677-81