Autonomous E-coaching in the wild: Empirical validation of a model-based reasoning system

13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2014

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages 725-732

  Kamphorst, Bart A ^a   Klein, Michel C A ^b   Van Wissen, Arlette ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Behavior change; Decision support system; E coaching; EHealth; HCI; Model based diagnostics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911380316     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. V. Aleven, B. Mclaren, I. Roll, and K. Koedinger. Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2):101-128, 2006.
2. J. H. Anderson and B. A. Kamphorst. Ethics of e-coaching: Implications of employing pervasive computing to promote healthy and sustainable lifestyles. In Proc. of IEEE SIPC Workshop 2014, in conjunction with PerCom 2014 (to appear). IEEE Computer Society Press.
3. T. Baranowski, R. Buday, D. I. Thompson, and J. Baranowski. Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. American journal of preventive medicine, 34(1):74-82, 2008.
4. T. Bosse, M. Hoogendoorn, M. Klein, J. Treur, C. N. van der Wal, and A. van Wissen. Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions. JAAMAS, 27(1):52-84, 2013.
5. J. de Nooijer, P. van Assema, E. de Vet, and J. Brug. How stable are stages of change for nutrition behaviors in the netherlands. Health Promotion International, 20(1):27-32, 2005.
6. J. Dias and A. Paiva. I want to be your friend: Establishing relations with emotionally intelligent agents. In Proc. of AAMAS, pages 777-784, 2013.
7. R. E. Glasgow, L. Chance, D. J. Toobert, J. Brown, S. E. Hampson, and M. C. Riddle. Long term effects and costs of brief behavioural dietary intervention for patients with diabetes delivered from the medical office. Patient education and counseling, 32(3):175-184, 1997.
8. K. V. Hindriks and C. M. Jonker. Creating human-machine synergy in negotiation support systems: Towards the pocket negotiator. In Proc. of the 1st International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, HuCom'08, pages 47-54, New York, 2009. ACM.
9. S. M. Horowitz. Applying the transtheoretical model to pregnancy and std prevention: A review of the literature. American Journal of Health Promotion, 17(5):304-328, 2003.
10. D. Kahneman and S. Frederick. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, editors, Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, pages 49-81. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
11. M. Klein, N. Mogles, and A. Van Wissen. Why won't you do what's good for you? Using intelligent support for behavior change. In International Workshop on Human Behavior Understanding (HBU'll), Volume 7065 of LNCS, pages 104-116. Springer Verlag, 2011.
12. M. Klein, N. Mogles, and A. Van Wissen. Intelligent mobile support for therapy adherence and behavior change (to appear). Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2013.
13. P. Krebs, J. O. Prochaska, and J. S. Rossi. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Preventive medicine, 51(3):214-221, 2010.
14. S. Li. Agentstra: an internet-based multi-agent intelligent system for strategic decision-making. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(3):565-571, 2007.
15. R. Lin and S. Kraus. Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans. Communications of the ACM, 53(1):78-88, 2010.
16. R. Lin, Y. Oshrat, and S. Kraus. Automated agents that proficiently negotiate with people: Can we keep people out of the evaluation loop. In New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations, pages 57-80. Springer, 2012.
17. C. Midden and J. Ham. Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In Proc. of Persuasive '09, pages 12:1-12:6, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
18. S. Noar, C. Benac, and M. Harris. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4):673-693, 2007.
19. H. Oinas-Kukkonen and M. Harjumaa. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In H. Oinas-Kukkonen, editor, LNCS, Volume 5033 of PERSUASIVE'08, pages 164-176. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
20. R. L. Ownby, D. Waldrop-Valverde, R. J. Jacobs, A. Acevedo, and J. Caballero. Cost effectiveness of a computer-delivered intervention to improve HIV medication adherence. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 13(1):29, 2013.
21. A. Pommeranz, P. Wiggers, W.-P. Brinkman, and C. M. Jonker. Social acceptance of negotiation support systems: Scenario-based exploration with focus groups and online survey. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14(4):299-317, 2012.
22. J. Prochaska and C. DiClemente. The transtheoretical approach: Crossing traditional boundaries of therapy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, 111., 1984.
23. J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review, 24(1):33-60, 2005.
24. S. Salmela, M. Poskiparta, K. Kasila, K. Vähsärja, and M. Vanhala. Transtheoretical model-based dietary interventions in primary care: A review of the evidence in diabetes. Health Education Research, 24(2):237-252, 2009.
25. B. Silverman, D. Pietrocola, B. Nye, N. Weyer, O. Osin, D. Johnson, and R. Weaver. Rich socio-cognitive agents for immersive training environments: Case of nonkin village. JAAMAS, 24(2):312-343, 2012.
26. M. J. Sorbi, S. B. Mak, J. H. Houtveen, A. M. Kleiboer, and L. J. van Doornen. Mobile web-based monitoring and coaching: Feasibility in chronic migraine. Journal of medical Internet research, 9(5), 2007.
27. H. van der Heijden. Mobile decision support for in-store purchase decisions. Decision Support Systems, 42(2):656-663, 2006.
28. J. M. v. d. Zwaan, E. Geraerts, V. Dignum, and C. M. Jonker. User validation of an empathic virtual buddy against cyberbullying. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2012: Advanced Technologies in the Behavioral, Social and Neurosciences, 181:243, 2012.