Transtheoretical model-based dietary interventions in primary care: A review of the evidence in diabetes

Health Education Research

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 237-252

  Salmela, Sanna ^a   Poskiparta, Marita ^a   Kasila, Kirsti ^b   Vähäsarja, Kati ^a   Vanhala, Mauno ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^b University of Applied Sciences   (Finland)

^c Central Finland Central Hospital   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 62549119947     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyn015     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Elder J, Ayala G, Harris S. Theories and intervention approaches to health-behavior change in primary care. Am J Prev Med 1999; 17: 275-84.
2. Whitlock E, Orleans T, Pender N et al. Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling intervention - an evidence-based approach. Am J Prev Med 2002; 22: 267-84.
3. Whitelaw S, Baldwin S, Bunton R et al. The status of evidence and outcomes in stages of change research. Health Educ Res 2000; 15: 707-18.
4. Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 390-5.
5. Prochaska J, Norcross J. Systems of Psychotherapy - A Transtheoretical Analysis. New York: Wadsworth Pub Co, 2003.
6. Ashworth P. Breakthrough or bandwagon? Are interventions tailored to stage of change more effective than non-staged interventions? Health Educ J 1997; 56: 166-74.
7. Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Review article: stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol 1998; 17: 290-9.
8. Povey R, Conner C, Sparks P et al. A critical examination of the application of the Transtheoretical Model's stages of change to dietary behaviors. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 641-51.
9. Bunton R, Baldwin S, Flynn D et al. The "stages of change" model in health promotion: science and ideology. Critic Public Health 2000; 10: 55-71.
10. Adams J, White M. Why don't stage-based activity promotion interventions work? Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 237-43.
11. West R. Time for a change: putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction 2005; 100: 1036-9.
12. Van Sluijs E, Van Poppel M, Van Mechelen W. Stage-based lifestyle interventions in primary care: are they effective? Am J Prev Med 2004; 26: 330-43.
13. Riemsma RP, Pattenden J, Bridle C et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions based on a stages-of-change approach to promote individual behavior change. Health Technol Assess 2002; 6: 1-231.
14. WHO 2004. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Fifty-seventh World Health Assembly. Provisional agenda item 12.6. Available at: http://www.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf-files/WHA57/A57-R17-en.pdf. Accessed: 22 May 2004.
15. Vallis M, Ruggiero L, Greene G et al. Stages of change for healthy eating in diabetes - relation to demographic, eating-related, health care utilization, and psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1468-74.
16. Oldroyd J, Unwin N, White M et al. Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of behavioural interventions to modify cardiovascular risk factors in men and women with impaired glucose tolerance: outcomes at 6 months. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001; 52: 29-43.
17. Clark M, Hampson S, Avery L et al. Effects of a tailored lifestyle self-management intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Health Psychol 2004; 9: 365-79.
18. Miller WR, Mount KA. A small study of training in motivational interviewing: does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behav Cogn Psychother 2001; 29: 457-71.
19. American Diabetes Association. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: S11-4.
20. Steptoe A, Doherty S, Rink E et al. Behavioral counseling in general practice for the promotion of healthy behavior among adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease: randomised trial. Br Med J 1999; 319: 943-8.
21. Keller S, Donner-Banzhof N, Kaluza G et al. Improving physician delivered counseling in a primary care setting: lessons from a failed attempt. Educ Health 2000; 13: 387-97.
22. Steptoe A, Kerry S, Rink E et al. The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 265-9.
23. Van der Veen J, Bakx C, Van den Hoogen H et al. Stage-matched nutrition guidance for patients at elevated risk for cardiovascular disease: a randomized intervention study in family practice. J Fam Pract 2002; 51: 751-8.
24. Verheijden M, Van der Veen J, Bakx C et al. Stage-matched nutrition guidance: stages of change and fat consumption in Dutch patients at elevated cardiovascular risk. J Nutr Educ Behav 2004; 36: 228-37.
25. Verheijden M, Bakx C, Akkermans R et al. Web-based targeted nutrition counseling and social support for patients at increased cardiovascular risk in general practice: randomized controlled trial. J Med Intern Res 2004; 6: e44. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2004/4/e44/. Accessed: 16 December 2004.
26. Logue E, Sutton K, Jarjoura D et al. Transtheoretical model-chronic disease care for obesity in primary care: a randomized trial. Obes Res 2005; 13: 917-27.
27. Jackson N, Waters E. The Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions Taskforce. Guidelines for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions. Version 1.2. Australia: Deakin University, 2005. Available at: www.vichealth.vic/gov.au/ cochrane/activities/Guidelines%20for%20HPPH%20reviews.pdf. Accessed: May 2005.
28. Jackson N. Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Health Promotion and Public Health Interventions. Australia: Deakin University. Available at: www.ph.cochrane.org/Files/Website%20Documents/HPPH-systematic-review-handbook. pdf.
29. Jackson N. Dictionary for the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Available at: www.myhamilton.ca/NR/rdonlyres/6BC5E4A/-3F82-41F0-BCE1-6CC9921FDD8A/0/ QADictionary2003.pdf.
30. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M et al. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2004; 1: 176-84.
31. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003.
32. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. J Am Med Assoc 2003; 289: 1969-075.
33. West S, King V, Carey T et al. Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence. Evidence Report, Technology Assessment No. 47. AHRQ Publication No 02-E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2002.
34. Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N et al. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004; 4: 22-33.
35. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Int Med 2001; 134: 657-62.
36. Schulz K, Grimes DA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 2002; 359: 614-8.
37. Prochaska J, DiClemente C. Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med 2005; 41: 406-16.
38. US Preventive Services Task Force. Behavioral counseling in primary care to promote a healthy diet - recommendations and rationale. Am J Prev Med 2003; 24: 93-100.
39. International Union for Health Promotion and Education. The Evidence of Health Promotion Effectiveness. Shaping Public Health in a New Europe. A report for the European Commission by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education. Part two - Evidence book. Brussels and Luxembourg: IUHPE, 1999.
40. WHO 2003. The World Health Report: 2003: Shaping the Future. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Available at: http://www.who.int/whr/2003/en/whr03-en.pdf.
41. Pill R, Stott N, Rollnick S et al. A randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve the care given in general practice to Type II diabetic patients: patient outcomes and professional ability to change behavior. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 229-35.
42. Van Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C et al. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 2003; 28: 1290-9.