Social acceptance of negotiation support systems: Scenario-based exploration with focus groups and online survey

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 299-317

  Pommeranz, Alina ^a   Wiggers, Pascal ^a   Brinkman, Willem Paul ^a   Jonker, Catholijn M ^a  

^a Mekelweg 4   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Focus groups; Functional requirements; Negotiation support systems; Social acceptance; Technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL ASPECTS; SURVEYS;

FOCUS GROUPS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; NEGOTIATION SUPPORT SYSTEM; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867696388     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-011-0181-8     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50: 179-211.
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
3. Bruseberg A, McDonagh-Philp D (2002) Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. Appl Ergon 33(1): 27-381.
4. Bui T (1994) Evaluating negotiation support systems: a conceptualization. In: Mudge TN, Shriver BD (eds) HICSS 1994, IEEE Press, New York.
5. Carey M (1995) Comment: concerns in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Health Res 5: 487-495.
6. Carroll J (2000) Making use: secenrio-based design of human-computer interactions. MIT Press, Cambridge.
7. Davis F (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3): 319-339.
8. Goodman J, Dickinson A, Syme A (2004) Gathering requirements for mobile devices using focus groups with older people. In: Designing a more inclusive world, Proceedings of the 2nd Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT). Springer, Berlin.
9. Havard Business School Essentials: (2003) Negotiation. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston.
10. Hindriks K, Jonker C (2008) Creating human-machine synergy in negotiation support systems: towards the pocket negotiator. In: Brinkman W-P, Hindriks K (eds) HuCom'08, ACM, New York.
11. ITU (2004) Itu internet reports: the portable internet, http://www. itu. int./portableinterne. Tech rep, ITU.
12. Kersten G (1999) Negotiation support systems and negotiating agents. In: Modles et Systmes Multi-Agents pour la Gestion de la Environement et des Territoire.
13. Kersten G (2004) E-negotiation systems: interaction of people and technologies to resolve conflicts. Interneg Research Papers INR 08/04: 1-21.
14. Kersten G, Lo G (2003) Aspire: an integrated negotiation support system and software agents for ebusiness negotiation. Int J Inter Enterprise Manag 1(2): 293-315.
15. Kersten HG, Lai E (2007) Negotiation support and e-negotiation systems: an overview. Group Decision Negotiation 16: 553-586.
16. Ling R (1997) One can talk about common manners!: the use of mobile telephones in inappropriate situations. in themes in mobile telephony. In: Haddon L (ed) Themes in mobile telephony final report of the COST 248 Home and Work group.
17. Love S, Perry M (2004) Dealing with mobile conversations in public places: some implications for the design of socially intrusive technologies. In: CHI'04. ACM, New York, pp 1195-1198.
18. Mallat N, Rossi M, Tuunainen V, Arni A (2009) The impact of use context on mobile services acceptance: the case of mobile ticketing. Inform Manag 46: 190-195.
19. Neerincx M (2003) Cognitive task load design: model, methods and examples. In: Hollnagel E (ed) Handbook of cognitive task design. chapter 13. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
20. Nunamaker JF, Briggs RO, Mittleman D (1996) Lessons from a decade of group support systems. In: Proc of the twenty-ninth Hawaii international conference on system sciences 1996, vol. 3, pp. 418-427.
21. Palen L, Salzman M, Youngs E (2001) Discovery and integration of mobile communications in everyday life. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 5(2): 109-122.
22. Parameswaran M, Whinston A (2007) Social computing: an overview. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 19: 762-780.
23. Pommeranz A, Brinkman WP, Wiggers P, Broekens J, Jonker CM (2009) Towards design guidelines for negotiation support systems: an expert perspective using scenarios. In: Proc ECCE'09, VTT, Finland, pp 271-278.
24. Pommeranz A, Brinkman WP, Wiggers P, Jonker CM (2010) Social acceptance of negotiation support systems. In: Proc USAB 2010, Springer, Berlin.
25. Rangaswamy A, Shell G (1997) Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: towards an electronic bargaining table. Manag Sci 43(8): 1147-1163.
26. Schoop M, Jertila A, List T (2001) Negoisst: a negotiation support system for electronic business-to-business negotiations in e-commerce. Data Knowl Eng 47(3): 371-401.
27. Shih H (2004) Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior. Inform Manag 41(6): 719-729.
28. Sim J (2001) Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. J Adv Nurs 28(2): 345-352.
29. Smith J, Osborn M (2003) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Methods. Sage, London.
30. Srivastava L (2005) Mobile phones and the evolution of social behavior. Behav Inform Technol 24(2): 111-129.
31. Swaab R, Postmes T, Neijens P (2004) Negotiation support systems: communication and information as antecedents of negotiation settlement. Int Negotiation 9: 59-78.
32. Thomson L (2005) The heart and mind of the negotiator. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
33. Vetschera R, Kersten G, Koeszegi S (2006) User assessment of internet-based negotiation support systems: an exploratory study. J Organ Comput E-Commerce 16(2): 123-132.
34. Wang W, Benbasat I (2005) Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J Assoc Inform Syst 6(3): 72-101.
35. Wixom BH, Todd PA (2005) A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform Syst Res 16(1): 85-102.
36. Yu JLC, Liu C, Yao JE (2003) Technology acceptance model for wireless internet. Intern Res 13(3): 206-222.