Automated agents that proficiently negotiate with people: Can we keep people out of the evaluation loop

Studies in Computational Intelligence

Volumn 383, Issue , 2012, Pages 57-80

  Lin, Raz ^a   Oshrat, Yinon ^c   Kraus, Sarit ^a,b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82555194191     PISSN: 1860949X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Byde, A., Yearworth, M., Chen, K.-Y., Bartolini, C.: AutONA: A system for automated multiple 1-1 negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Electronic Commerc (CEC), pp. 59-67 (2003)
2. Chalamish, M., Sarne, D., Kraus, S.: Programming agents as a means of capturing self-strategy. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1161-1168 (2008)
3. Fleming, M., Olsen, D., Stathes, H., Boteler, L., Grossberg, P., Pfeifer, J., Schiro, S., Banning, J., Skochelak, S.: Virtual reality skills training for health care professionals in alcohol screening and brief intervention. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 22(4), 387-398 (2009)
4. Gal, Y., Pfeffer, A., Marzo, F., Grosz, B.J.: Learning social preferences in games. In: Proceedinge of the Nineteenth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 226-231 (2004)
5. Grosz, B., Kraus, S., Talman, S., Stossel, B.: The influence of social dependencies on decision-making: Initial investigations with a new game. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 782-789 (2004)
6. Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Tykhonov, D.: Analysis of negotiation dynamics. In: Klusch, M., Hindriks, K.V., Papazoglou, M.P., Sterling, L. (eds.) CIA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4676, pp. 27-35. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
7. Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Tykhonov, D.: Negotiation dynamics: Analysis, concession tactics, and outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT), pp. 427-433 (2007)
8. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 15(2), 221-252 (2007)
9. Katz, R., Kraus, S.: Efficient agents for cliff edge environments with a large set of decision options. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 697-704 (2006)
10. Kraus, S., Hoz-Weiss, P., Wilkenfeld, J., Andersen, D.R., Pate, A.: Resolving crises through automated bilateral negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 172(1), 1-18 (2008)
11. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D.: Designing and building a negotiating automated agent. Computational Intelligence 11(1), 132-171 (1995)
12. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.K.: Thinking coalitionally: party arithmetic, process opportunism, and strategic sequencing. In: Young, H.P. (ed.) Negotiation Analysis, pp. 153-193. The University of Michigan Press (1992)
13. Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Can automated agents proficiently negotiate with humans? Communications of the ACM 53(1), 78-88 (2010)
14. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artificial Intelligence 172(6-7), 823-851 (2008)
15. Offerman, T., Potters, J., Verbon, H.A.A.: Cooperation in an overlapping generations experiment. Games and Economic Behavior 36(2), 264-275 (2001)
16. Olsen, D.E.: Interview and interrogation training using a computer-simulated subject. In: Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference (1997)
17. Osborne,M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course In Game Theory.MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
18. Oshrat, Y., Lin, R., Kraus, S.: Facing the challenge of human-agent negotiations via effective general opponent modeling. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 377-384 (2009)
19. Rosenfeld, A., Kraus, S.: Modeling agents through bounded rationality theories. In: Proceedings of the Tewenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 264-271 (2009)
20. Selten, R., Abbink, K., Buchta, J., Sadrieh, A.: How to play (3x3)-games: A strategy method experiment. Games and Economic Behavior 45(1), 19-37 (2003)
21. Selten, R., Mitzkewitz, M., Uhlich, G.R.: Duopoly strategies programmed by experienced players. Econometrica 65(3), 517-556 (1997)
22. TAC Team: A trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing 5(2), 43-51 (2001)
23. Talman, S., Hadad, M., Gal, Y., Kraus, S.: Adapting to agents' personalities in negotiation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 383-389 (2005)
24. Traum, D.R., Marsella, S.C., Gratch, J., Lee, J., Hartholt, A.: Multi-party, Multi-Issue, Multi-Strategy Negotiation for Multi-Modal Virtual Agents. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J.C., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 117-130. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)