Methods for inducing intuitive and deliberate processing modes

Foundations for Tracing Intuition: Challenges and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 219-237

  Horstmann, Nina ^a   Hausmann, Daniel ^b   Ryf, Stefan ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911051659     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203861936     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439-449.
2. Betsch, C., & Kunz, J. J. (2008). Individual strategy preferences and decisional fit. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 532-555.
3. Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2001). Financial incentives do not pave the road to good experimentation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 404.
4. Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gütig, R. (2001). I like it but I don't know why: A value-account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253.
5. Bless, H., & Igou, E. R. (2005). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures in judgment and decision making. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 193-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Bolte, A., & Goschke, T. (2005). On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1248-1255.
7. Bolte, A., Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Emotion and intuition: Effects of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic coherence. Psychological Science, 14, 416-421.
8. Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7-42.
9. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
10. Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-418). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008a). Fitting decisions:Mood and intuitive versus deliberative decision strategies. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 931-943.
12. De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008b). In the winning mood:Affect in the Iowa gambling task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 42-50.
13. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-598.
14. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005-1007.
15. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
16. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Olden, Z. (2006). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously:Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 627-631.
17. Edland, A., & Svenson, O. (1993). Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and findings (pp. 27-40). New York: Plenum Press.
18. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339.
19. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
20. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
21. Fisk, A. D., Derrick, W. L., & Schneider, W. (1986). A methodological assessment and evaluation of dual-task paradigms. Current Psychology, 5, 315-327.
22. Forgas, J. P. (1989). Mood effects on decision making strategies. Australian Journal of Psychology, 41, 197-214.
23. Forgas, J. P. (2006). Affect in social thinking and behavior. New York: Psychology Press.
24. Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1988). Affect in social judgments. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 125-145.
25. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228.
26. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.
27. Glöckner, A., & Engel, C. (2008). Can we trust intuitive jurors? An experimental analysis. MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 38. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn. com/abstract=1307580.
28. Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 691-702.
29. Halberstadt, J. B., & Levine, G. M. (1999). Effects of reasons analysis on the accuracy of predicting basketball games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 517-530.
30. Hausmann, D., & Läge, D. (2008). Sequential evidence accumulation in decision making: The individual desired level of confidence can explain the extent of information acquisition. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 229-243.
31. Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383-451.
32. Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making 4, 335-354.
33. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49-81). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34. Levine, G. M., Halberstadt, J. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (1996). Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 230-240.
35. Luce, M. F., Bettman, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1997). Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 384-405.
36. MacGregor, D. (1993). Time pressure and task adaptation: Alternative perspectives on laboratory studies. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 73-82). New York: Plenum Press.
37. Maule, A. J., & Svenson, O. (1993). Concluding remarks. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 323-329). New York: Plenum Press.
38. Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, J. C. H., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 707-732.
39. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
40. Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 1118-1123.
41. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
42. Pretz, J. E. (2008). Intuition versus analysis: Strategy and experience in complex everyday problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 36, 554-566.
43. Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., & Handley, S. (2003). In search of counter-examples:Deductive rationality in human reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A. Human Experimental Psychology, 7, 1129-1145.
44. Stemmler, G. (2008). Induktion von Emotionen in der experimentellen Emotionspsychologie. In W. Janke, M. Schmidt-Daffy & G. Debus (Eds.), Experimentelle Emotionspsychologie. Methodische Ansätze, Probleme, Ergebnisse (pp. 207-224). Lengerich: Pabst.
45. Stone, D. N., & Ziebart, D. A. (1995). A model of financial incentive effects in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 250-261.
46. Tordesillas, R. S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). Thinking too much or too little? The effects of introspection on the decision-making process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 623-629.
47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
48. Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 557-580.
49. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
50. Zakay, D. (1993). The impact of time perception processes on decision making under time stress. In O. Svenson & A. J. Maule (Eds.), Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making (pp. 59-72). New York: Plenum Press.