Experts’ Judgments of Management Journal Quality: An Identity Concerns Model

Journal of Management

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1785-1812

  Peters, Kim ^a   Daniels, Kevin ^b   Hodgkinson, Gerard P ^c   Haslam, S Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

journal lists; journal quality; self favoring bias; social identity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84910050818     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: 15571211     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0149206311434532     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aiken L. S.,West S. G.Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1991:
2. Ashkanasy N. M.Playing the citations game.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2007;28:643-645
3. Australian Business Deans Council Journal Ratings List. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.abdc.edu.au/3.43.0.0.1.0.htm on 6January2012.
4. Bauer D. J.,Curran P. J.Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques.Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2005;40:373-400
5. Bensman S. J.The impact factor, total citations, and better citation mouse traps: A commentary.Journal for the American Society of Information Science and Technology. 2007;58:1904-1908
6. Bezrukova K.,Jehn K. A.,Zanutto E.,Thatcher S. M. B.Do workgroup faultlines help or hurt? A moderated model of group faultlines, team identification, and group performance.Organization Science. 2009;20:35-50
7. Boyacigiller N.,Adler N. J.The parochial dinosaur: Organizational science in a global context.Academy Management Review. 1991;:262-290
8. Bruner J. S.On perceptual readiness.Psychological Review. 1957;64:123-152
9. Byrne B. M.Structural equation modeling with EQS. 2006. Structural equation modeling with EQS (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2006:
10. Campbell W. K.,Sedikides C.Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration.Review of General Psychology. 1999;3:23-43
11. Cartter A. M.An assessment of quality in graduate education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education; 1966:
12. Clark T.,Wright M.Reviewing journal rankings and revisiting peer review: Editorial perspectives.Journal of Management Studies. 2007;46:612-621
13. Coe R.,Weinstock I.Evaluating the management journals: A second look.Academy of Management Journal. 1984;2:660-666
14. Cohen J.,Cohen P.,West S. G.,Aiken L. S.Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003:
15. Cunningham G. B.The influence of group diversity on intergroup bias following recategorization.Journal of Social Psychology. 2006;146:533-547
16. Extejt M. M.,Smith J. E.The behavioral sciences and management: An evaluation of relevant journals.Journal of Management. 1990;16:539-551
17. Financial Times Business School Survey.2006. Retrieved from http://rankings.ft.com/businessschoolrankings/european-business-school-rankings-2006 on 6January2012.
18. Franke R. H.,Edlund T. W.,Oster F.The development of strategic management: Journal quality and article impact.Strategic Management Journal. 1990;11:243-253
19. Glick W. H..Paper presented at the 2009 Academy of Management meeting; 2009Chicago, IL; 2009.
20. Gomez-Mejia L. R.,Balkin D. B.Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective.Academy of Management Journal. 1992;35:921-955
21. Han J.Crossover linear modeling: Combining multilevel heterogeneities in crossover relationships.Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8:290-316
22. HarveyC.MorrisH.KellyA.2007. The Association of Business Schools academic journal quality guide. Retrieved March 1, 2009, from http://www.the-abs.org.uk/?id=257.
23. Haslam S. A.,Ellemers N.International review of industrial and organizational psychology. Hodgkinson G. P.Ford J. K., ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2005:39-118.
24. Hodge D. R.,Lacasse J. R.Evaluating journal quality: Is the H-index a better measure than impact factors?.Research on Social Work Practice. 2011;21:222-230
25. Hodgkinson G. P.Opening the black box of editorship. Baruch Y.Konrad A. M.Aguinis H.Starbuck W. H., ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008:104-113.
26. Johnson J. L.,Podsakoff P. M.Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik’s index in a dependency network.Academy of Management Journal. 1994;37:1392-1407
27. Judge T. A.Marginalizing the.Journal of Applied Psychology. Industrial Psychologist. 2003;40:56-59
28. Lewis B.BizEd. November/December: ; 2008:42-45.
29. Lewis B. R.,Templeton G. F.,Luo X.A scientometric investigation into the validity of IS journal quality measures.Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2007;8:619-633
30. Link A. M.US and non-US submissions: An analysis of reviewer bias.Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280:246-247
31. Lowe A.,Locke J.Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: Results of a web-based survey of British accounting academics.Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2005;30:81-98
32. Macdonald S.,Kam J.Aadrvark et al.: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies.Journal of Information Science. 2007;33:702-717
33. Mahoney M. J.Psychology of the scientist: An evaluative review.Social Studies of Science. 1979;9:349-375
34. Marsh S. J.,Hunt C. S.Not quite as simple as A-B-C.Journal of Management Inquiry. 2006;15:301-315
35. Messick D. M.,Bloom S.,Boldizar J. P.,Samuelson C. D.Why we are fairer than others.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1985;21:480-500
36. Mingers J.,Harzing A.-W.Ranking journals in business and management: A statistical analysis of the Harzing data set.European Journal of Information Systems. 2007;16:303-316
37. Mitra D.,Golder P. N.Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs?.Journal of Marketing. 2008;72:31-49
38. Nunnally J. C.Psychometric theory. 1978. Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978:
39. Oakes P. J.,Haslam S. A.Understanding prejudice, racism and social conflict. Augoustinos M.Reynolds K., ed. London: Sage; 2001:179-194.
40. Oakes P. J.,Haslam S. A.,Turner J. C.Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1994:
41. Orne M. T.On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications.American Psychologist. 1962;17:776-783
42. Pendlebury D. A.The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators.Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis. 2009;57:1-11
43. Pfeffer J.Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable.Academy of Management Review. 1993;18:599-620
44. Podsakoff P. M.,MacKenzie S. B.,Lee J. Y.,Podsakoff N. P.Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88:879-903
45. Podsakoff P. M.,MacKenzie N. P.,Podsakoff N. P.,Bacharach D. G.Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century.Journal of Management. 2008;34:641-720
46. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2002:
47. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.,Cheong Y. F.,Congdon R.,du Toit M.HLM6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago: Scientific Software International; 2004:
48. Roese N. J.,Olson J. M.Better, stronger, faster: Self-serving judgment, affect regulation, and the optimal vigilance hypothesis.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2007;2:124-141
49. Saha S.,Saint S.,Christakis D. A.Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality?.Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2003;91:42-47
50. Satorra A.,Bentler P. M.Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research. von Eye A.Clogg C. C., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:399-419.
51. Serenko A.,Bontis N.What’s familiar is excellent: The impact of exposure effect on perceived journal quality.Journal of Informetrics. 2011;5:219-223
52. Siemsen E.,Roth A.,Oliveria R.Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects.Organizational Research Methods. 2010;13:456-476
53. Starbuck W. H.How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication.Organization Science. 2005;16:180-200
54. Tahai A.,Meyer M. J.A revealed preference study of management journals’ direct influences.Strategic Management Journal. 1999;20:279-296
55. Tajfel H.,Flament C.,Billig M. G.,Bundy R. F.Social categorization and intergroup behaviour.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1971;1:149-177
56. Tajfel H.,Turner J. C.The social psychology of intergroup relations. Austin W. G.Worchel S., ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1979:33-47.
57. Terry D. J.,O’Brien A. T.Status, legitimacy and ingroup bias in the context of an organizational merger.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 2001;4:271-289
58. Turner J. C.Social identity and intergroup relations. Tajfel H., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1982:15-40.
59. Turner J. C.,Hogg M. A.,Oakes P. J.,Reicher S. D.,Wetherell M. S.Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1987:
60. Turner J. C.,Oakes P. J.,Haslam S. A.,McGarty C. A.Self and collective: Cognition and social context.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994;20:454-463
61. Van Fleet D. D.,McWilliams A.,Siegel D. S.A theoretical and empirical analysis of journal rankings: The case of formal lists.Journal of Management. 2000;26:839-861
62. Whitley R.The fragmented state of management studies: Reasons and consequences.Journal of Management Studies. 1984;21:331-348
63. Yue W.,Wilson C. S.,Boller F.Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology.Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2007;95:70-77