Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods

Heredity

Volumn 113, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 503-513

  Heidaritabar, M ^a   Vereijken, A ^b   Muir, W M ^c   Meuwissen, T ^d   Cheng, H ^e   Megens, H J ^a   Groenen, M A M ^a   Bastiaansen, J W M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Hendrix Genetics   (Netherlands)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^e AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANCESTRY; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOMICS; PHENOTYPE; POULTRY; SELECTIVE BREEDING;

ALLELE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREEDING; CHICKEN; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; MALE; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICKENS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PEDIGREE; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84909999396     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.55     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Amaral AJ (2010). Nucleotide variation and footprints of selection in the porcine and chicken genomes. PhD-thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen University Library, Wageningen, the Netherlands, ISBN 9789085856559.
2. Barton NH (2000). Genetic hitchhiking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 355: 1553-1562.
3. Bastiaansen JWM, Coster A, Calus MPL, van Arendonk JAM, Bovenhuis H (2012). Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet Sel Evol 44: 3.
4. Chevin LM, Hospital F (2008). Selective sweep at a quantitative trait locus in the presence of background genetic variation. Genetics 180: 1645-1660.
5. Dekkers JCM (2004). Commercial application of marker- and gene-assisted selection in livestock: strategies and lessons. J Anim Sci 82:E-Suppl E313-E328.
6. Elferink MG, Megens HJ, Vereijken A, Hu X, Crooijmans RPMA, Groenen MAM (2012). Signatures of selection in the genomes of commercial and non-commercial chicken breeds. PloS ONE 7: E32720.
7. Ennis S (2007). Linkage disequilibrium as a tool for detecting signatures of natural selection. Methods Mol Biol 376: 59-70.
8. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn, Longman: Harlow, England.
9. Garnett I, Falconer DS (1975). Protein variation in strains of mice differing in body size. Genet Res 25: 45-57.
10. Goddard M (2009). Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica 136: 245-257.
11. Groenen MAM, Megens HJ, Zare Y, Warren WC, Hillier LW, Crooijmans RPMA et al. (2011). The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 12: 274.
12. Groenen MAM, Wahlberg P, Foglio M, Cheng HH, Megens HJ, Crooijmans RPMA et al. (2009). A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate. Genome Res 19: 510-519.
13. Jannink JL (2010). Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 42: 35.
14. Johansson AM, Pettersson ME, Siegel PB, Carlborg Ö (2010). Genome-wide effects of long-term divergent selection. PLoS Genet 6: E1001188.
15. Kimura M (1989). The neutral theory of molecular evolution and the world view of the neutralists. Genome 31: 24-31.
16. Kinghorn BP, Hickey JM, van der Werf JHJ (2011). Long-range phasing and use of crossbred data in genomic selection. 7th European Symposium on Poultry Genetics. World's Poultry Science Association (WPSA): Beekbergen, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 1-3.
17. Liu H, Sørensen AC, Meuwissen TH, Berg P (2014). Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs. Genet Sel Evol 46: 8.
18. MacCluer JW, Vandeberg JL, Read B, Ryder OA (1986). Pedigree analysis by computersimulation. Zoo Biol 5: 147-160.
19. Megens HJ, Crooijmans RPMA, Bastiaansen JWM, Kerstens HHD, Coster A, Jalving R et al. (2009). Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken. BMC Genet 10: 86.
20. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
21. Misztal I, Legarra A, Aguilar I (2009). Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information. J Dairy Sci 92: 4648-4655.
22. Muir WM (2007). Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124: 342-355.
23. Park JH, Wacholder S, Gail MH, Peters U, Jacobs KB, Chanock SJ et al. (2010). Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat Genet 42: 570-575.
24. Przeworski M, Coop G, Wall JD (2005). The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution 59: 2312-2323.
25. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JRS, Sherwood E, Webster MT et al. (2010). Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464: 587-591.
26. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM, Levine HZP, Richter DJ, Schaffner SF et al. (2002). Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419: 832-837.
27. Schaeffer LR (2006). Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet 123: 218-223.
28. Smith JM, Haigh J (1974). The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res 23: 23-35.
29. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE (2009). Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol 41: 37.
30. Villanueva B, Dekkers JCM, Woolliams JA, Settar P (2004). Maximizing genetic gain over multiple generations with quantitative trait locus selection and control of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 82: 1305-1314.
31. Wang J, Lin M, Crenshaw A, Hutchinson A, Hicks B, Yeager M et al. (2009). High-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using nanofluidic Dynamic Arrays. BMC Genomics 10: 561.