Allele frequency changes due to hitch-hiking in genomic selection programs

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Liu, Huiming ^a   Sørensen, Anders C ^a   Meuwissen, Theo H E ^b   Berg, Peer ^a,c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c Nordic Genetic Resource Center   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANIMAL; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; INBREEDING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; HUMAN HERPESVIRUS 4;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; GENOMICS; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84893174042     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1297-9686-46-8     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Long-term genomic improvement-new challenges for population genetics. Bijma P, J Anim Breed Genet 2012 129 1 2 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2011.00985.x 22225578
2. Falconer D, Mackay T, Introduction to Quantitative Genetics London: Longman 1996
3. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME, Genetics 2001 157 1819 1829 11290733
4. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Calus MPL, Meuwissen THE, de Roos APW, Veerkamp RF, Genetics 2008 178 553 561 10.1534/genetics.107.080838 18202394
5. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, Genet Sel Evol 2009 41 37 10.1186/1297-9686-41-37 19566932
6. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA, J Anim Breed Genet 2007 124 369 376 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007. 00693.x 18076474
7. Quantification of inbreeding due to distant ancestors and its detection using dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. Keller MC, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Genetics 2012 190 283
8. Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. Hill WG, Weir BS, Genet Res 2011 93 47 64 10.1017/S0016672310000480
9. The distribution of the proportion of the genome which is homozygous by descent in inbred individuals. Franklin IR, Theor Popul Biol 1977 11 60 80 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90007-7 404725
10. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Smith JM, Haigh J, Genet Res 1974 23 23 35 10.1017/S0016672300014634 4407212
11. Genetic hitchhiking. Barton NH, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2000 355 1553 1562 10.1098/rstb.2000.0716 11127900
12. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding. Sonesson AK, Woolliams JA, Meuwissen TH, Genet Sel Evol 2012 44 27 10.1186/1297-9686-44-27 22898324
13. Marker-assisted selection reduces expected inbreeding but can result in large effects of hitchhiking. Pedersen LD, Sorensen AC, Berg P, J Anim Breed Genet 2010 127 189 198 20536636
14. Long homozygous chromosomal segments in reference families from the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain. Broman KW, Weber JL, Am J Hum Genet 1999 65 1493 1500 10.1086/302661 10577902
15. Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Jannink JL, Genet Sel Evol 2010 42 35 10.1186/1297-9686-42-35 20712894
16. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL, Crop Sci 2009 49 1 12 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0512
17. QMSim: a large scale genome simulator for livestock. Sargolzaer M, Schenkel FS, Bioinformatics 2009 25 680 681 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp045 19176551
18. R Development Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computation 2012
19. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Henderson CR, Biometrics 1975 31 423 447 10.2307/2529430 1174616
20. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Hayes BJ, Visscher PM, Goddard ME, Genet Res 2009 91 47 60 10.1017/S0016672308009981
21. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, Crossa J, Legarra A, Manfredi E, Weigel K, Cotes JM, Genetics 2009 182 375 385 10.1534/genetics.109. 101501 19293140
22. Comparison between linear and non-parametric regression models for genome-enabled prediction in wheat. Perez-Rodriguez P, Gianola D, Gonzalez-Camacho JM, Crossa J, Manes Y, Dreisigacker S, G3 (Bethesda) 2012 2 1595 1605 23275882
23. Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks. Gonzalez-Camacho JM, De Los Campos G, Perez P, Gianola D, Cairns JE, Mahuku G, Babu R, Crossa J, Theor Appl Genet 2012 125 759 771 10.1007/s00122-012-1868-9 22566067
24. The Bayesian Lasso. Park T, Casella G, J Am Stat Assoc 2008 103 681 686 10.1198/016214508000000337
25. BLR: Bayesian linear regression (version 1.3). de los Campos G, Perez-Rodriguez P, 2012 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BLR
26. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Smith JM, Haigh J, Genet Res 2007 89 391 403 10.1017/S0016672308009579 18976527
27. GeneticsPed: Pedigree and genetic relationship functions (R package version1.20.0). Gregor G, David AH, 2007 http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/ release/bioc/html/GeneticsPed.html
28. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Meuwissen THE, Luo Z, Genet Sel Evol 1992 24 305 313 10.1186/1297-9686-24-4-305
29. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC, Am J Hum Genet 2007 81 559 575 10.1086/519795 17701901
30. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, Genetics 2007 177 2389 2397 18073436
31. Priors in whole-genome regression: the Bayesian alphabet returns. Gianola D, Genetics 2013 194 573 596 10.1534/genetics.113.151753 23636739
32. The hitchhiking effect revisited. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH, Genetics 1989 123 887 899 2612899
33. Benefits from marker-assisted selection under an additive polygenic genetic model. Villanueva B, Pong-Wong R, Fernandez J, Toro MA, J Anim Sci 2005 83 1747 1752 16024693
34. The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock. Hayes B, Goddard ME, Genet Sel Evol 2001 33 209 229 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 11403745
35. The sex-specific impact of meiotic recombination on nucleotide composition. Popa A, Samollow P, Gautier C, Mouchiroud D, Genome Biol Evol 2012 4 412 422 10.1093/gbe/evs023 22417915
36. Hot and cold spots of recombination in the human genome: the reason we should find them and how this can be achieved. Arnheim N, Calabrese P, Nordborg M, Am J Hum Genet 2003 73 5 16 10.1086/376419 12772086
37. Large-scale adaptive hitchhiking upon high recombination in Drosophila simulans. Quesada H, Ramirez UEM, Rozas J, Aguade M, Genetics 2003 165 895 900 14573496
38. Evidence for hitchhiking of deleterious mutations within the human genome. Chun S, Fay JC, Plos Genet 2011 7 1002240 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002240 21901107
39. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Goddard M, Genetica 2009 136 245 257 10.1007/s10709-008-9308-0 18704696