Road network vulnerability analysis: Conceptualization, implementation and application

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 49, Issue , 2015, Pages 136-147

  Jenelius, Erik ^a   Mattsson, Lars Göran ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Disruption; GIS; Road network; Robustness; Transport; Vulnerability

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; ROADS AND STREETS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURES; DISRUPTION; ROAD NETWORK; TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE; TRANSPORT; VULNERABILITY; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS; VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT;

NETWORK SECURITY;

ALGORITHM; GIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; ROAD TRANSPORT; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; VULNERABILITY;

EID: 84909642061     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bell M.G.H., Kanturska U., Schmöcker J.-D., Fonzone A. Attacker-defender models and road network vulnerability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2008, 366:1893-1906.
2. Berdica K. An introduction to road vulnerability: What has been done, is done and should be done. Transport Policy 2002, 9:117-127.
3. Beser M., Algers S. SAMPERS - The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool. National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, advances in spatial science 2001, 101-118. Springer. L. Lundqvist, L.-G. Mattsson (Eds.).
4. Bono F., Gutiérrez E. A network-based analysis of the impact of structural damage on urban accessibility following a disaster: The case of the seismically damaged Port Au Prince and Carrefour urban road networks. Journal of Transport Geography 2011, 19:1443-1455.
5. Buriol, L. S., Resende, M. G. C., & Thorup, M. (2004). Speeding up dynamic shortest path algorithms. Technical report TD-5RJ8B. AT&T Labs. September 2003. Revised August 2004.
6. Chen A., Yang C., Kongsomsaksakul S., Lee M. Network-based accessibility measures for vulnerability analysis of degradable transportation networks. Networks and Spatial Economics 2007, 7:241-256.
7. Cherkassky, B. V., Goldberg, A. V., & Radzik, T. (1993). Shortest paths algorithms: Theory and experimental evaluation. Technical report 93-1480. Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
8. Dalziell E.P., Nicholson A.J. Risk and impact of natural hazards on a road network. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering 2001, 127:159-166.
9. D'Este G.M., Taylor M.A.P. Network vulnerability: An approach to reliability analysis at the level of national strategic transport networks. The network reliability of transport 2003, 23-44. Pergamon-Elsevier, Oxford. M.G.H. Bell, Y. Iida (Eds.).
10. Duan Y., Lu F. Structural robustness of city road networks based on community. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2013, 41:75-87.
11. Erath A., Birdsall J., Axhausen K.W., Hajdin R. Vulnerability assessment methodology for Swiss road network. Transportation Research Record 2009, 2137:118-126.
12. Jenelius E. Network structure and travel patterns: Explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport Geography 2009, 17:234-244.
13. Jenelius E. User inequity implications of road network vulnerability. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2010, 2:57-73.
14. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.-G. Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46:746-760.
15. Jenelius E., Mattsson L.-G., Levinson D. Traveler delay costs and value of time with trip chains, flexible activity scheduling and information. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45:789-807.
16. Jenelius E., Petersen T., Mattsson L.-G. Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation Research Part A 2006, 40:537-560.
17. Kaplan S., Garrick B.J. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1981, 1:11-27.
18. Keynes J.M. A treatise on probability 1921, Macmillan & Co., London.
19. Knoop V., van Zuylen H., Hoogendoorn S. The influence of spillback modelling when assessing consequences of blockings in a road network. European Journal of Transportation and Infrastructure Research 2008, 8:287-300.
20. Luathep P., Sumalee A., Ho H.W., Kurauchi F. Large-scale road network vulnerability analysis: A sensitivity analysis based approach. Transportation 2011, 38:799-817.
21. Mas-Colell A., Whinston M.D., Green J.R. Microeconomic theory 1995, Oxford University Press, New York.
22. Matisziw T.C., Murray A.T. Modeling s-t path availability to support disaster vulnerability assessment of network infrastructure. Computers & Operations Research 2009, 36:16-26.
23. Nicholson, A. J. & Du, Z. P. (1994). Improving network reliability: A framework. In Proceedings of 17th Australian road research board conference (Vol. 3, pp. 1-17).
24. Qiang Q., Nagurney A. A unified network performance measure with importance identification and the ranking of network components. Optimization Letters 2008, 2:127-142.
25. Sullivan J.L., Novak D.C., Aultman-Hall L., Scott D.M. Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44:323-336.
26. Tatano H., Tsuchiya S. A framework for economic loss estimation due to seismic transportation network disruption: A spatial computable general equilibrium approach. Natural Hazards 2008, 44:253-265.
27. Taylor M.A.P., Susilawati Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks. Transportation Research Part A 2012, 46:761-771.
28. Trafikanalys (2013). Transportarbete 1950-2012. Trafikanalys (Swedish government agency for Transport Analysis), PM 2013-06-26 (in Swedish).
29. Zhan F.B., Noon C.E. Shortest path algorithms: An evaluation using real road networks. Transportation Science 1998, 22:65-73.
30. Zhu S., Levinson D., Liu H.X., Harder K. The traffic and behavioral effects of the I-35W Mississippi River bridge collapse. Transportation Research Part A 2010, 44:771-784.