The influence of spillback modelling when assessing consequences of blockings in a road network

European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 287-300

  Knoop, Victor ^a   van Zuylen, Henk ^a   Hoogendoorn, Serge ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Blocking back; Robustness; Spillback; Vulnerable links

Indexed keywords

EID: 65449131643     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15677141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2008.8.4.3358     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rijkswaterstaat Adviesdienst Verkeer en Vervoer (2007). Inventarisatie beleidseffecten incidentmanagement (in Dutch). Rotterdam (English summary).
2. Bates, J., Polak, J., Jones, P. and Cook, A. (2001). The valuation of reliability for personal travel. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 37, no. 2-3, pp. 191-229.
3. Bell, M.G.H. (2000). A game theory approach to measure the performance reliability of transport networks. Transportation Research Part B, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 533-545.
4. Bell, M.G.H. and Cassir, C. (2002). Risk-adverse user equilibrium traffic assignment: an application of game theory. Transportation Research Part B, vol. 36, pp. 671-681.
5. Bogers, E.A.I. and Van Zuylen, H.J. (2004). The importance of reliability in route choices in freight transport for various actors on various levels. Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Strasbourg.
6. Bogers, E.A.I., Viti, F. and Hoogendoorn, S.P. (2005). Joint Modeling of Advanced Travel Information Service, Habit, and Learning Impacts on Route Choice by Laboratory Simulator Experiments. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, vol., pp. 189-197.
7. Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991). Game Theory, MIT Press.
8. Godunov, S.K. (1959). A difference scheme for numerical computation of of discontinuous solutions of equations of fluid dynamics. Math. Sb., vol. 47, pp. 271-290.
9. Jenelius, E., Petersen, T. and Mattsson, L.-G. (2006). Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis. Transportation 7Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 537-560.
10. Knoop, V.L., Hoogendoorn, S.P. and Van Zuylen, H.J. (2005). Approach to Critical Link Analysis of Robustness for Dynamical Road Networks. Proceedings of Traffic & Granular Flow, Berlin.
11. Knoop, V.L., Hoogendoorn, S.P. and Van Zuylen, H.J. (2007a). Quantification of the impact of spillback modeling in assessing network reliability. Proceedings of 86th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
12. Knoop, V.L., Snelder, M. and Van Zuylen, H.J. (2007b). Comparison of Link-Level Robustness Indicators. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Transportation Network Reliability (INSTR), Den Haag, the Netherlands.
13. Kraan, M., Schreuder, M. and Tamminga, G. (2008). Vulnerability of a National Road Network. Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 13-17, 2008, Washington D.C.
14. Kwon, J., Mauch, M. and Varaiya, P. (2006). The components of congestion: delay from incidents, special events, lane closures, weather, potential ramp metering gain, and excess demand. Proceedings of the 85th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington.
15. Lebacque, J.P. (1996). The Godunov Scheme and What it Means for First Order Traffic Flow Models. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory.
16. Li, M. (2008). Combining DTA Approaches for Studying Road Network Robustness. TRAIL PhD thesis, Delft, Delft University of Technology (to be published).
17. Lighthill, M. J. and Whitham, G. B. (1955). On Kinematic Waves. II. A Theory of Traffic Flow on Long Crowded Roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 229, no. 1178, pp. 317 - 345.
18. Liu, H. X., Recker, W. and Chen, A. (2004). Uncovering the contribution of travel time reliability to dynamic route choice using real-time loop data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 435-453.
19. Murray-Tuite, P.M. and Mahmassani, H.S. (2004). A Methodology for the determination of Vulnerable Links in a Transportation Network. Transportation Research Records: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 1881, pp. 88-96.
20. Nagae, T. and Akamatsu, T. (2007). An Efficient Algorithm for a Maxmin Routing Model for Hazardous Materials. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Transport Network Reliability, The Hague, the Netherlands.
21. Ngoduy, D. (2006). Macroscopic Discontinuity Modelling for Multiclass Multilane Traffic Flow Operations. PhD thesis, Delft, Delft University of Technology.
22. Richards, P.I. (1956). Shock waves on the highway. Operations Research, vol. 4, pp. 42-51.
23. Tampère, M.J., Stada, J. and Immers, L.H. (2007). Methodology for Identifying Vulnerable Section in a National Road network. Proceedings of 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
24. Tu, H., Van Lint, J. W. C. and Van Zuylen, H. J. (2005). Real-time modelling travel time reliability on freeway. Proceedings of 10th Jubilee Meeting of the EURO Working Group of Transportation, Poznan.