Learning affordances of collaborative software design

The Design of Instruction and Evaluation: Affordances of Using Media and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 77-100

  Kafai, Yasmin B ^a   Ching, Cynthia Carter ^b   Marshall, Sue ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909081898     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611376     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. American Association of University Women. (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
2. Björklund, D. F. (1991). Children's strategies: Contemporary views of cognitive development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M, & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.
4. Brown, A. (1992). "Design experiments:" Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 1-37.
5. Canada, K., & Brusca, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational Technology Research & Development, 39(2), 43-51.
6. Ching, C. C. (2000). Apprenticeship, learning and technology: Children as oldtimers and newcomers in a culture of learning through design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
7. Ching, C. C., Kafai, Y. B., & Marshall, S. (2000). Spaces for change: Gender and technology access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9, 67-78.
8. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
9. Colella, V. (2002). Participatory simulations: Building collaborative understanding through immersive dynamic modeling. In T. Koschman, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 357-391). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Cone, C. (2001). Technically speaking: Girls and computers. In P. O'Reilly, E. Penn, & K. Mareis (Eds.), Educating young adolescent girls (pp. 171-187). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Davis, E. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91-141.
12. Erickson, J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). The evolution of critical standards as students design hypermedia documents. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3 & 4), 351-386.
13. Fey, M. H. (2001). Gender and technology: A question of empowerment. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 17, 357-361.
14. Finegold, M., & Pundak, D. (1991). A study of change in students' conceptual frameworks in astronomy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 17, 151-166.
15. Friedman, S. L., & Scholnick, E. K. (Eds.). (1997). The developmental psychology of planning: Why, how and when do we plan? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Friedman, S. L., Scholnick, E. K., & Cocking R. R. (Eds.). (1987). Blueprints for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17. Harel, I. (1991). Children designers. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18. Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1990). Software design as a learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-32.
19. Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247-298.
20. Kafai, Y. B. (1995). Minds in play: computer game design as a context for children's learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Kafai, Y. B. (1998). Children as designers, testers and evaluators of educational software. In A. Druin (Ed.), The design of children's technology (pp. 123-146). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
22. Kafai, Y. B., & Ching, C. C. (2001). Affordances of collaborative software design planning for elementary students' science talk. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 70(3), 323-363.
23. Kafai, Y. B., Ching, C. C., & Marshall, S. (1998). Children as designers of educational multimedia software. Computers and Education, 29, 117-126.
24. Kaiser Family Foundation. (1999). Kids, media and the millennium. Sacramento, CA: Author.
25. Kinnear, A. (1995). Introduction of microcomputers: A case study of patterns of use and children's perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 27-40.
26. Lammers, S. (1986). Programmers at work. Redmond, WA: Tempus Books.
27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Linn, M. C., Bell, P., & Hsi, S. (1998). Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The Knowledge Integration Environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 6(1-2), 4-38.
29. Marshall, S. (2000). Planning in context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
30. Palumbo, D. B. (1990). Programming language/problem-solving research: A review of relevant issues. Review of Educational Research, 60(1), 65-89.
31. Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3&4), 429-450.
32. Roth, M. (1995). Inventors, copycats, and everyone else: The emergence of shared resources and practices as defining aspects of classroom communities. Science Education, 79(5), 475-502.
33. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
34. Sandoval, W. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 5-52.
35. Shaffer, D. (2002). Design, collaboration, and computation: The design studio as a model for computer-supported collaboration in mathematics. In T. Koschman, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 197-222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Shashaani, L. (1994). Gender differences in computer experience and its influence on computer attitudes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 347-367.
37. Spoehr, K. (1995). Enhancing the acquisition of conceptual structures through hypermedia. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 75-101). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
39. Webb, N., & Palincsar, A. (1996). Collaborative learning. In D. Berliner (Ed.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 345-413). New York: Macmillan.