Gender and technology: A question of empowerment

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 357-361

  Fey, Marion Harris ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008848820     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/105735601317095089     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Belenky, M. F., Clinc-hy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R, & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
2. Blair, K., & Takayoshi, P. (Eds.) (1999). Feminist cyberscapes: Mapping gendered academic spaces. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.
3. Christie, A. A. (1995). No chips on their shoulders: Girls, boys, and telecommunications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University West, Phoenix.
4. Ess, C. (Ed.) (1996). Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Fey, M. (1994a). Finding voice through computer communication: A new venue for collaboration. Journal of Advanced Composition, 14, 221-237.
6. Fey, M. H. (1994b). Transforming the literacy classroom through reader response and computer networking. In C. K. Kinzer, K. A. Hinchman, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Mtiltidimensional aspects of litemcy research, theory, and practice. 43rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 296-305). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
7. Fey, M. (1997). Literate behavior in a cross-age computer-mediated discussion: A question of empowerment, hi C. K. Kinzer, K. A. Hinchman, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries in literacy theory and practice. 46th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 507-518). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
8. Fey, M. (1998). Critical literacy in sc-hool-college collaboration through computer networking: A feminist research project. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 85-117.
9. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Guzzetti, B., & Fey, M. H. (2001, Feb.). Critical perspectives on teachers research: Gender and post-typographical text. Reading Online. Accessed January 22, 2001: http://readingonline.org
11. Guzzetti, B., Young, J., Gritsavage, M., Fyfe, L., & Hardenbrook, M. (in press). Reading, ivriting, and talking gender in literacy learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association, The National Reading Conference Literary Series.
12. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2000). But will it work in the heartland? A response and illustration. Journal of Adolescent Literacy 43, 462-469.
13. Nicholson, J., Gelpi, A., Young, S., & Sulzby, E. (1998). Influences of gender and open-ended software on first graders' collaborative composing activities on computers. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 9, 3-42.
14. Pryor, J. (1995). Gender issues in group work: A case study involved with computers. British Educational Research Journal, 21, 277-288.
15. Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Fail ing at fairness: Hoiv America 's schools cheat girls. New York: Macmillan.
16. Selfe, C. L. (1992). Preparing English teachers for the virtual age: The case for technology clitics. In G. Hawisher & P. LeBlanc- (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition: Teaching and research in the virtual age (pp. 24-42). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
17. Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. Journal of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, 50, 411-437.
18. Tomow, J. (1993). Discussing literature in high school Engl ish classes using a local area computer network. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
19. Tomow, J. (1997). Link/Age: Composing in the online classroom. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.