Review of speech-to-text recognition technology for enhancing learning

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 65-84

  Shadiev, Rustam ^a   Hwang, Wu Yuin ^b   Chen, Nian Shing ^c   Huang, Yueh Min ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Group of users; Literature review; Speech to text recognition technology; Supporting and enhancing learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908510752     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alapetite A., Andersen H. B., & Hertzum M. (2009). Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(1), 36-49.
2. Bain K., Basson S., Faisman A., & Kanevsky D. (2005). Accessibility, transcription, and access everywhere. IBM systems journal, 44(3), 589-603.
3. Bennett, S., Hewitt, J., Mellor, B., & Lyon, C. (2007). Critical success factors for automatic speech recognition in the classroom. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services (pp. 224-233). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
4. Camiciottoli, B. C. (2005). Adjusting a business lecture for an international audience: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 183-199.
5. Chen, N. S., Ko, H. C., Kinshuk & Lin, T. (2005). A model for synchronous learning using the Internet. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 181-194.
6. Colwell, C., Jelfs, A., & Mallett, E. (2005). Initial requirements of deaf students for video: Lessons learned from an evaluation of a digital video application. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 201-217.
7. Coniam, D. (1999). Voice recognition software accuracy with second language speakers of English. System, 27(1), 49-64.
8. Elliot, L., Foster, S., & Stinson, M. (2002). Student study habits using notes from a speech-to-text support service. Exceptional children, 69(1), 25-40.
9. Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J. V., Barile, M., Fossey, M., & Simone, C. (2000). Access to educational and instructional computer technologies for post-secondary students with disabilities: Lessons from three empirical studies. Journal of Educational Media, 25(3), 179-201.
10. Fiscus, J. G., Ajot, J., & Garofolo, J. S. (2007). The rich transcription 2007 meeting recognition evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4625, 373-389.
11. Goddard, W., Kaplan, L., Kuehnle, J., & Beglau, M. (2007). Voice recognition and speech-to-text pilot implementation in primary general education technology-rich eMINTS classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.emints.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/TtS-VRpilot-qualitative.pdf
12. Huang, Y. M., & Chiu, P. S. (2014). The effectiveness of a meaningful learning-based evaluation model for context-aware mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12147
13. Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Kuo, T. C. T., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of speech-to-text recognition application on learning performance in synchronous cyber classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 367-380.
14. Hwang, W. Y., Shadiev, R., Kuo, T. C. T., & Chen, N. S. (2010). A study of speech to text recognition and its effect to synchronous learning. In J. Herrington & B. Hunter (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2010 (pp. 546-555). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
15. Jones, D. (2005). Voice recognition: A new assessment tool? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 413-427.
16. Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561.
17. Kanevsky, D., Basson, S., Chen, S., Faisman, A., Zlatsin, A., Conrod, S., & McCormick, A. (2006). (2006, June). Speech transcription services. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference Speech and Computer, St. Petersburg, Russia.
18. Kheir, R., & Way, T. (2006, June). Improving speech recognition to assist real-time classroom note taking. Paper presented at the 29th Rehabilitation engineering and assistive technology society of North America conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.
19. Kirsh, D. (2010). Thinking with external representations. AI & Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 25(4), 441-454.
20. Konur, O. (2007). Computer-assisted teaching and assessment of disabled students in higher education: the interface between academic standards and disability rights. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 207-219.
21. Kuo, T. C. T., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Effects of applying STR for group learning activities on learning performance in a synchronous cyber classroom. Computers & Education, 58(1), 600-608.
22. Kuo, T. C. T., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y. & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of applying STR for group learning activities on learning performance in a synchronous cyber classroom. In I. Aedo, N. S. Chen, D. G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, & Kinshuk (Eds), The 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2011 (pp. 232-236). Los Alamitos, CA: The IEEE Computer Society Press.
23. Lee, I. X. (2011). The application of speech recognition technology for remediating the writing difficulties of students with learning disabilities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
24. Leitch, D. (2008). GIFT Atlantic liberated learning high school pilot project: A study of the transfer of speech recognition technology from university classrooms to high school classrooms. (Phase III Report). Nova Scotia, Canada: Saint Mary's University press.
25. Li Y., Wald M., Wills G., Khoja S., Millard D., Kajaba J., Singh P., & Gilbert L. (2011). Synote: Development of a web-based tool for synchronized annotations. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(3), 295-312.
26. Luppi, E., Primiani, R., Raffaelli, C., Tibaldi, D., & Violi, A. M. (2009). Net4Voice-new technologies for voice-converting in barrier-free learning environments: Development of innovative learning methodologies, experiment and results. eLearning papers, 13, 1-13.
27. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63(8), 760-769.
28. Miller L. (2007). Issues in lecturing in a second language: Lecturer's behaviour and students' perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 32(6), 747-760.
29. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156-163.
30. Neilsen, M. (2009). Supporting struggling writers with the use of voice recognition software in class. Literacy, 49(1), 30-39.
31. Nisbet, P. D., & Spooner, R. (1999). Supportive writing technology. Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh CALL Centre.
32. Nisbet, P. & Wilson, A. (2002). Introducing speech recognition in schools. Edinburgh, UK: CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh.
33. Nisbet, P., Wilson, A., & Aitken, S. (2005). Speech recognition for students with disabilities. Proceedings of the Inclusive and Supportive Education Congress, ISEC 2005 Conference. Delph, UK: Inclusive Technology.
34. Nisbet, P., Wilson, A., & Balfour, F. (2008). Introducing speech recognition in schools: Using dragon naturally speaking. Edinburgh, UK: CALL Centre, University of Edinburgh.
35. Petta, T. D., & Woloshyn, V. E. (2001). Voice recognition for on-line literacy: continuous voice recognition technology in adult literacy training. Education and Information Technologies, 6(4), 225-240.
36. Ranchal, R., Taber-Doughty, T., Guo, Y., Bain, K., Martin, H., Robinson, J., & Duerstock, B. (2013). Using speech recognition for real-time captioning and lecture transcription in the classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(4), 299 -311.
37. Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
38. Ryba, K., McIvor, T., Shakir, M., & Paez, D. (2006). Liberated learning: Analysis of university students' perceptions and experiences with continuous automated speech recognition. Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-19.
39. Shadiev, R. (2011). A study of speech to text recognition and its effects on learning performance in synchronous cyber classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Central University, Jhongli, Taiwan.
40. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (in press). A pilot study of facilitating cross-cultural understanding with project-based collaborative learning activity in online environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.
41. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (in press). Investigating applications of speech to text recognition for face to face seminar to assist learning of non-native English participants. Technology, Pedagogy and Education.
42. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2014). Investigating applications of speech-to-text recognition to assist learning in online and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 8(supplement), 179-189.
43. Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Investigating learning strategies of using texts generated by Speech to Text Recognition technology in traditional classroom. In Childress et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the AECT International Conference on the Frontier in e-Learning Research (pp.279-286). Taichung, Taiwan: National Central University & AECT.
44. Shadiev, R., Huang, Y. M., & Hwang, W. Y. (2014, July). Investigating visual attention of students with different learning ability on texts generated by speech-to-text recognition. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, Greece.
45. Wald, M. (2008). Learning through multimedia: Automatic speech recognition enhancing accessibility and interaction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17(2), 215-233.
46. Wald, M. (2010). Synote: Accessible and assistive technology enhancing learning for all students. In K. Miesenberger et al. (Eds.), ICCHP 2010, LNCS 6180 (pp. 177-184). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
47. Wald, M., & Bain, K. (2008). Universal access to communication and learning: the role of automatic speech recognition. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society, 6(4), 435-447.
48. Way, T., Kheir, R., & Bevilacqua, L. (2008). Achieving aceptable accuracy in a low-cost, assistive note-taking, Speech Transcription System. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Telehealth and Assistive Technologies (pp. 72-77). Retrieved from http://www.csc.villanova.edu/~tway/publications/wayAT08.pdf
49. Wang, Y., Chen, N. S., & Levy, M. (2008). The design and implementation of a holistic training model for language teacher education in a cyber face-to-face learning environment. Computers and Education, 55(2), 777-788.
50. Weggerle, A., Schmidt, P., & Schulthess, P. (2009, November). Speech to multi-media document transcription for university lectures. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Madrid, Spain.
51. Wu, S. H., & Alrabah, S. (2009). A cross-cultural study of Taiwanese and Kuwaiti EFL students' learning styles and multiple intelligences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(4), 393-403.
52. Zhili, L., Wanjie, T., & Jiacheng, X. (2010). A study and application of speech recognition technology in primary and secondary school for deaf/hard of hearing students. Proceedings of the 4th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology (pp. 44-46). Singapore: Singapore Therapeutic, Assistive & Rehabilitative Technologies Centre.
53. Zschorn, A., Littlefield, J. S., Broughton, M., Dwyer, B., & Hashemi-Sakhtsari, A. (2003). Transcription of multiple speakers using speaker dependent speech recognition. (DSTO Technical Report DSTO_TR_1498). Canberra, Australia: The Defense Science and Technology Organization.