Associating peripheral and foveal visual input across saccades: A default mode of the human visual system?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 14, Issue 11, 2014, Pages

  Weiß, Katharina ^a   Schneider, Werner X ^a   Herwig, Arvid ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION-EFFECT LEARNING; ADULT; ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; OBJECT CONTINUITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION; RETINA FOVEA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TRANSSACCADIC LEARNING; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ACTION-EFFECT LEARNING; EYE MOVEMENTS; OBJECT CONTINUITY; PREDICTION; TRANSSACCADIC LEARNING;

ADULT; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FOVEA CENTRALIS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; SACCADES; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908501381     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/14.11.7     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
2. Bar, M. (2009). The proactive brain: Memory for predictions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1235-1243.
3. Boi, M., Ögmen, H., Krummenacher, J., Otto, T. U., & Herzog, M. H. (2009). A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. Journal of Vision, 9(13):5, 1-11, http:// journalofvision.org/9/13/5/, doi:10.1167/9.13.5. [PubMed] [Article]
4. Bompas, A., & O'Regan, J. K. (2006a). Evidence for a role of action in color perception. Perception, 35, 65-78.
5. Bompas, A., & O'Regan, J. K. (2006b). More evidence for sensorimotor adaptation in color perception. Journal of Vision, 6(2):5, 145-153, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/6/2/5, doi:10.1167/6.2. 5. [PubMed] [Article]
6. Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D., & Stark, L. (1975). Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 15, 719- 722.
7. Bridgeman, B., & Stark, L. (1979). Omnidirectional increase in threshold for image shifts during saccadic eye movements. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 241-243.
8. Burr, D. C., Morrone, M. C., & Ross, J. (1994). Selective suppression of the magnocellular pathway during saccadic eye movements. Nature, 371, 511- 513.
9. Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2011). Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 890-896.
10. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
11. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
12. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
13. Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingsworth (Eds.), Visual memory (Oxford series in visual cognition) (pp. 209-245). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Cox, D., Meier, P., Oertelt, N., & DiCarlo, J. (2005). Breaking position-invariant object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1145-1147.
15. Demeyer, M., De Graef, P., Wagemans, J., & Verfaillie, K. (2010). Object form discontinuity facilitates displacement discrimination across saccades. Journal of Vision, 10(6):17, 1-14, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/6/17, doi:10.1167/ 10.6.17. [PubMed] [Article]
16. Deubel, H., Bridgeman, B., & Schneider, W. X. (1998). Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy. Vision Research, 38, 3147-3159.
17. Deubel, H., Bridgeman, B., & Schneider, W. X. (2004). Different effects of eyelid blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 772-778.
18. Deubel, H., & Schneider, W. X. (1994). Perceptual stability and postsaccadic visual information: Can man bridge a gap? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 259-260.
19. Deubel, H., Schneider, W. X., & Bridgeman, B. (1996). Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement. Vision Research, 36, 985-996.
20. Duhamel, J. R., Colby, C. L., & Goldberg, M. E. (1992). The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science, 255, 90-92.
21. Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11(5):14, 1-36, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/11/5/14, doi:10.1167/ 11.5.14. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229-240.
23. Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138-154.
24. Flombaum, J. I., Scholl, B. J., & Santos, L. R. (2009). Spatiotemporal priority as fundamental principle of object persistence. In B. Hood & L. Santos (Eds.), The origins of object knowledge (pp. 135- 164). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.), Perception (Vancouver studies in cognitive science) (Vol. 5; pp. 89-110). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
27. Henderson, J. M. (2008). Eye movements and scene memory. In S. J. Luck & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 87-121). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
28. Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2004). Introduction to interface of vision, language, and action. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 1-58). New York: Psychology Press.
29. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003a). Eye movements and visual memory: Detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 58-71.
30. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2003b). Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Psychological Science, 14, 493-497.
31. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
32. Herwig, A., & Horstmann, G. (2011). Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 531-537.
33. Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intentionbased and stimulus-based actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1540-1554.
34. Herwig, A., & Schneider, W. X. (in press). Predicting object features across saccades: Evidence from object recognition and visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
35. Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2009). Intention and attention in ideomotor learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 219-227.
36. Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(444), 1-18, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00444.
37. Hillstrom, A. P., Scholey, H., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2012). The effect of the first glimpse at scene on eye movements during search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 204-210.
38. Hein, E., & Cavanagh, P. (2012). Motion correspondence in the Ternus display shows feature bias in spatiotopic coordinates. Journal of Vision, 12(7):16, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/7/ 16, doi:10.1167/12.7.16. [PubMed] [Article]
39. Hollingworth, A. (2012). Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge. In M. D. Dodd & J. H. Flowers (Eds.), The influence of attention, learning, and motivation on visual search (pp. 63-89). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
40. Hunt, A. R., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Remapped visual masking. Journal of Vision, 11(1):13, 1-8, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/11/1/1/13, doi:10. 1167/11.1.13. [PubMed] [Article]
41. Kahnemann, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
42. Land, M. F., & Tatler, B. W. (2009). Looking and acting: Vision and action in natural behaviour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Li, N., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2008). Unsupervised natural experience rapidly alters invariant object representation in visual cortex. Science, 321, 1502-1507.
44. Li, N., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2010). Unsupervised natural visual experience rapidly reshapes size-invariant object representation in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron, 67, 1062-1075.
45. MacKay, D. M. (1972). Visual stability. Investigative Ophthalmology, 11, 518-524.
46. Mathôt, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2011). Visual attention and stability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 516-527, doi:10.1098/rstb.2010. 0187.
47. Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917.
48. Meinecke, C. (1989). Retinal eccentricity and the detection of targets. Psychological Research, 51, 107-116.
49. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391.
50. Nuthmann, A. (2014). How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 342-360.
51. Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., & Shen, J. (2003). Area activation: A computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cognitive Science, 27, 299-312.
52. Richters, D. (2008). Hand-eye correlation: An arbitrary sensorimotor contingency can alter visual sensitivity. Psychology Dissertations, paper 6, http://hdl. handle.net/2047/d1001651x.
53. Richters, D. P., & Eskew, R. T. (2009). Quantifying the effect of natural and arbitrary sensorimotor contingencies on chromatic judgments. Journal of Vision, 9(4):27, 1-11, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/9/4/27, doi:10.1167/9.4.27. [PubMed] [Article]
54. Rolfs, M., Jonikaitis, D., Deubel, H., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 252-256.
55. Schreij, D., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2013). The role of space and time in object-based visual search. Visual Cognition, 21, 306-329.
56. Schneider, W. X. (2013). Selective visual processing across competition episodes: A theory of task driven visual attention and working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 1-13.
57. Shanks, D. R., Pearson, S. M., & Dickinson, A. (1989). Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality by human subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41B, 139-159.
58. Szinte, M., & Cavanagh, P. (2011). Spatiotopic apparent motion reveals local variations in space constancy. Journal of Vision, 11(2):4, 1-20, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/11/2/4, doi:10. 1167/11.2.4. [PubMed] [Article]
59. Tas, A. C., Moore, C. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2012). An object-mediated updating account of insensitivity to transsaccadic change. Journal of Vision, 12(11):18, 1-13, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/12/11/18, doi:10.1167/12.11.18. [PubMed] [Article]
60. Thiele, A., Henning, P., Kubischik, M., & Hoffmann, K.-P. (2002). Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science, 295, 2460-2462.
61. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
62. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A featureintegration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
63. Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., & Hughes, G. (2012). Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 943-959.
64. Waszak, F., & Herwig, A. (2007). Effect anticipation modulates deviance processing in the brain. Brain Research, 1183, 74-82.
65. Wischnewski, M., Belardinelli, A., Schneider, W. X., & Steil, J. J. (2010). Where to look next? Combining static and dynamic proto-objects in a TVA-based model of visual attention. Cognitive Computation, 2, 326-343.
66. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0-A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
67. Wolfe, J. M., O'Neill, P., & Bennett, S. C. (1998). Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypotheses. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 140-156.
68. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787-835.