Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 890-896

  Castelhano, Monica S ^a   Heaven, Chelsea ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053120968     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0107-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aminoff, E., Gronau, N., & Bar, M. (2007). The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations. Cerebral Cortex, 27, 1493-1503.
2. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 5, 617-629.
3. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143-177.
4. Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2010). The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1283-1297.
5. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33, 753-763.
6. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The influence of color on perception of scene gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 34, 660-675.
7. Castelhano, M. S., Pollatsek, A., & Cave, K. (2008). Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 795-801.
8. Chamizo, V. D. (2003). Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: Assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 102-113.
9. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
10. Ehinger, K., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2009). Modelling search for people in 900 scenes: A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17, 945-978.
11. Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598-601.
12. Epstein, R., & Ward, E. J. (2010). How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area? Cerebral Cortex, 20, 294-303.
13. Epstein, R., Graham, K. S., & Downing, P. E. (2003). Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron, 37, 865-876.
14. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 108, 316-355.
15. Gillner, S., & Mallot, H. A. (1998). Navigation and acquisition of spatial knowledge in a virtual maze. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 445-463.
16. Henderson, J. M. (1992). Object identification in context: The visual processing of natural scenes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 319-341.
17. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271.
18. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
19. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextualcueing-Configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 454-463.
20. Kanan, C., Tong, M. H., Zhang, L., & Cottrell, G. W. (2009). SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics. Visual Cognition, 17, 979-1003.
21. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33, 816-828.
22. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(11, Art. 8), 1-13.
23. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during search. Vision Research, 46, 614-621.
24. Oliva, A. (2005). Gist of the scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neurobiology of attention (pp. 251-256). San Diego: Elsevier.
25. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520-527.
26. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1992). Eye movements and scene perception. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 342-376.
27. Sturz, B. R., Kelly, D. M., & Brown, M. F. (2010). Facilitation of learning spatial relations among locations by visual cues: Generality across spatial configurations. Animal Cognition, 13, 341-349.
28. Tatler, B. W. (2009). Current understanding of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17, 777-789.
29. Zelinsky, G. J., & Schmidt, J. (2009). An effect of referential scene constraint on search implies scene segmentation. Visual Cognition, 17, 1004-1028.