Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 63-89

  Hollingworth, Andrew ^a  

^a E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

Goal directed vision; Memory; Natural scenes; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; MOTIVATION; REVIEW; VISION;

ATTENTION; GOALS; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84873572656     PISSN: 01467875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_4     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell System Technical Journal, 40(1), 309-328
2. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1), 66-80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66
3. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K., & Rao, R. P. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(4), 723-767
4. Beck, V. M., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2012). Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological Science, 23(8), 887-898. doi: 10.1177/0956797612439068
5. Becker, M.W., & Rasmussen, I. P. (2008). Guidance of attention to objects and locations by longterm memory of natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1325-1338. doi: 10.1037/a0013650
6. Berlucchi, G. (2006). Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a mechanism and a better name. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(7), 1065-1074. doi: 10.1080/02643290600588426
7. Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 143-177. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007
8. Brady, T. F., & Chun, M. M. (2007). Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: Modeling contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 798-815. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4. 798
9. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(38), 14325-14329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803390105
10. Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2009). The specificity of the search template. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 34, 31-39. doi: 10.1167/9.1.34
11. Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2012). Task demands determine the specificity of the search template. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(1), 124-131. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0224-5
12. Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(4), 699-706. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.699
13. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cueing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(7), 1177-1187. doi: 10.1080/17470210600665996
14. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13(1), 99-108. doi: 10.1080/13506280500165188
15. Brooks, D. I., Rasmussen, I. P., & Hollingworth, A. (2010). The nesting of search contexts within natural scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1406-1418. doi: 10.1037/a0019257
16. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97(4), 523-547. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.4.523
17. Bundesen, C., Habekost, T.,&Kyllingsbaek, S. (2005).Aneural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review, 112(2), 291-328. doi: 10.1037/0033- 295x.112.2.291
18. Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(6), 970-981. doi: 10.3758/BF03194827
19. Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2010). The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1283-1297. doi: 10.3758/app.72.5.1283
20. Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2011). Scene context influences without scene gist: Eye movements guided by spatial associations in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 890-896. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0107-8
21. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 1017-1040. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000634
22. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753-763. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.753
23. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(5), 170-178. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01476-5
24. Chun, M. M., &Jiang,Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28-71. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
25. Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck, & A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 209-246). New York: Oxford University Press
26. Coltheart, M. (1980). The persistences of vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 290(1038), 269-294 (1980). doi: 10.1098/rstb.1980.0082
27. Desimone, R.,&Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
28. Dodd, M. D.,Van der Stigchel, S., &Hollingworth, A. (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy: Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20(3), 333-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x.
29. Downing, P. E., & Dodds, C. M. (2004). Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition, 11(6), 689-703. doi: 10.1080/13506280344000446
30. Droll, J. A., Hayhoe, M. M., Triesch, J., & Sullivan, B. T. (2005). Task demands control acquisition and storage of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(6), 1416-1438. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1416
31. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96(3), 433-458. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.96.3. 433
32. Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Visual search: A retrospective. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 14: 11-36. doi: 10.1167/11.5.14
33. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., &Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17(11), 973-980. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2006.01815.x.
34. Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(7), 1366-1378. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.7.1366
35. Ehinger, K. A., Hidalgo-Sotelo, B., Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2009). Modelling search for people in 900 scenes:A combined source model of eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 945-978. doi: 10.1080/13506280902834720
36. Einhauser, W., Rutishauser, U., & Koch, C. (2008a). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8(2), 2: 1-19. doi: 10.1167/8.2.2
37. Einhauser,W., Spain, M., & Perona, P. (2008b). Objects predict fixations better than early saliency. Journal of Vision, 8(14), 18: 11-26. doi: 10.1167/8.14.18
38. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press
39. Foulsham, T., Alan, R., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Scrambled eyes? Disrupting scene structure impedes focal processing and increases bottom-up guidance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(7), 2008-2025. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0158-y.
40. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? Perception, 36(8), 1123-1138. doi: 10.1068/p5659
41. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2008). What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. Journal of Vision, 8(2), 6: 1-17. doi: 10.1167/8.2.6
42. Gibson, B. S., Li, L., Skow, E., Brown, K., & Cooke, L. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science, 11(4), 324-327. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00264
43. Gilchrist, I. D., North, A., & Hood, B. (2001). Is visual search really like foraging? Perception, 30(12), 1459-1464. doi: 10.1068/p3249
44. Han, S. W., & Kim, M. S. (2009). Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1292-1302. doi: 10.1037/a0016452
45. Harrison, S. A., & Tong, F. (2009). Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas. Nature, 458(7238), 632-635. doi: 10.1038/nature07832
46. Hayhoe, M. (2000).Vision using routines:A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 43-64. doi: 1080/135062800394676
47. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(11), 498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.006
48. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., &Mack, M. (2007).Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during search in real-world scenes. In R. van Gompel, M. Fischer, W. Murray, & R. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537-562 Oxford: Elsevier
49. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243-271. doi: 10.1146/annurev. psych.50.1.243
50. Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., &Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 850-856. doi: 10.3758/pbr.16.5.850
51. Henderson, J. M.,Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(1), 210-228. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.1.210
52. Hillstrom, A. P., Scholey, H., Liversedge, S. P., & Benson, V. (2012). The effect of the first glimpse at a scene on eye movements during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(2), 204-210. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0205-7
53. Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of shortand long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 519-537. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.519
54. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and longterm scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), 396-411. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.396
55. Hollingworth, A. (2006). Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition, 14(4-8), 781-807. doi: 10.1080/13506280500193818
56. Hollingworth, A. (2008).Visual memory for natural scenes. In S. J. Luck, &A. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 123-162). NewYork: Oxford University Press
57. Hollingworth, A. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition, 17(1-2), 273-291. doi: 10.1080/13506280802193367
58. Hollingworth, A. (in press). Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: Commentary onVõ andWolfe (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(1), 113-136. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.1.113
59. Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 936-949. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.4.936
60. Hollingworth, A., & Matsukura, M](2011). Visual working memory content biases the allocation of gaze during search through natural scenes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle,WA.
61. Hollingworth, A., Matsukura, M., & Luck, S. J. (in press).Visual working memory modulates rapid eye movements to simple onset targets. Psychological Science Hollingworth, A., & Maxcey-Richard, A. M. (in press). Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
62. Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008 Understanding the function of visual shortterm memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(1), 163-181. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.163
63. Hooge, I. T. C., Over, E. A. B., vanWezel, R. J. A., &Frens, M.A. (2005). Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. Vision Research, 45(14), 1901-1908 doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005. 01.030
64. Horowitz, T. S., &Wolfe, J. M. (1998).Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394(6693), 575-577 doi: 10.1038/29068
65. Howard, C. J., Pharaon, R. G., Körner, C., Smith, A. D., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2011). Visual search in the real world: Evidence for the formation of distractor representations. Perception, 40(10), 1143-1153. doi: 10.1068/p7088
66. Hwang, A. D., Higgins, E. C., & Pomplun, M. (2009). A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 9(5), 25: 21-18. doi: 10.1167/9.5.25
67. Irwin, D. E. (1991). Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 420-456. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(91) 90015-G.
68. Itti, L. (2005). Quantifying the contribution of low-level saliency to human eye movements in dynamic scenes. Visual Cognition, 12(6), 1093-1123. doi: 10.1080/13506280444000661
69. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000).A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10-12), 1489-1506. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
70. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modelling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(3), 194-203. doi: 10.1038/35058500
71. Kanan, C., Tong, M. H., Zhang, L., &Cottrell, G.W. (2009). SUN: Top-down saliency using natural statistics. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 979-1003. doi: 10.1080/13506280902771138
72. Kang, M. S., Hong, S.W., Blake, R., &Woodman, G. F. (2011). Visual working memory contaminates perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 860-869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011- 0126-5
73. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334(6181), 430-doi: 10.1038/334430a0
74. Klein, R. M., &MacInnes,W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346-352. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00166
75. Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2010). Scene memory is more detailed than you think: The role of categories in visual long-term memory. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1551-1556. doi: 10.1177/0956797610385359
76. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Finding a new target in an old display: Evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 846-851. doi: 10.3758/bf03194110
77. Kristjánsson, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11(4), 328-332. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00265
78. Land, M. F., & Hayhoe, M. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research, 41(25-26), 3559-3565. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00102-X.
79. Land, M. F., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28(11), 1311-1328. doi: 10.1068/p2935
80. Ludwig, C. J. H., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2002). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(4), 902-912. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.4. 902
81. Mack, S. C., & Eckstein, M. P. (2011). Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Journal of Vision, 11(9), 9: 1-16. doi: 10.1167/11.9.9
82. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 8: 1-13. doi: 10.1167/9.11.8
83. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Journal of Vision, 10(2), 4: 1-11. doi: 10.1167/10.2.4
84. Mannan, S. K., Kennard, C., Potter, D., Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2010). Early oculomotor capture by new onsets driven by the contents of working memory. Vision Research, 50(16), 1590-1597. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.015
85. McCarley, J. S., Wang, R. X. F., Kramer, A. F., Irwin, D. E., & Peterson, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search havë Psychological Science, 14(5), 422-426. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01457
86. McPeek, R. M., & Keller, E. L. (2002). Superior colliculus activity related to concurrent processing of saccade goals in a visual search task. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87(4), 1805-1815. doi: 10.1152/jn.00501.2001
87. Müller, H. J., &Von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1591-1605. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.5.1591
88. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45(2), 205-231. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.042
89. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46(5), 614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.025
90. Olivers, C. N. L. (2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capturë The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1275-1291. doi: 10.1037/a0013896
91. Olivers, C. N. L. (2011). Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 243-247. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001
92. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1243-1265. doi: 10.1037/0096- 1523.32.5.1243
93. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9(3), 273-302. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000162
94. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42(1), 107-123. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00250-4
95. Pearson, J., Clifford, C. W. G., & Tong, F. (2008). The functional impact of mental imagery on conscious perception. Current Biology, 18(13), 982-986. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.048
96. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E., & McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12(4), 287-292. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00353
97. Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 16(2), 283-290. doi: 10.3758/BF03203943
98. Pomplun, M. (2006). Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays. Vision Research, 46(12), 1886-1900. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.12.003
99. Posner, M. I., &Cohen,Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, &D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum
100. Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1904-1914. doi: 10.1080/17470210902853530
101. Schneider,W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information-processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. doi: 10.1037/0033- 295x.84.1.1
102. Serences, J. T., Ester, E. F., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2009). Stimulus-specific delay activity in human primary visual cortex. Psychological Science, 20(2), 207-214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 9280.2009.02276.x.
103. Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14(1), 59-75. doi: 10.1163/156856801741369
104. Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Facilitation of return during scene viewing. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 1083-1108. doi: 10.1080/13506280802678557
105. Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2011a). Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(8), 2384-2398 (2011a). doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0191-x.
106. Smith, T. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2011b). Looking back atWaldo: Oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations. Journal of Vision, 11(1), 3: 1-11 (2011b). doi: 10.1167/11.1.3
107. Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 248-261. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.248
108. Soto, D., & Humphreys, G.W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 730-737. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.730
109. Soto, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2006). Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research, 46(6-7), 1010-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.008
110. Soto, D., Wriglesworth, A., Bahrami-Balani, A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2010). Working memory enhances visual perception: Evidence from signal detection analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 441-456. doi: 10.1037/a0018686
111. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs, 74, (11, Whole no. 498
112. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(2), 207-222. doi: 10.1080/14640747308400340
113. Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19(2), 73-74
114. Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception&Psychophysics, 62(5), 927-934 (2000). doi: 10.3758/BF03212078
115. Tatler, B.W., Hayhoe, M. M., Land, M. F., & Ballard, D. H. (2011). Eye guidance in natural vision: Reinterpreting salience. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 5: 1-23. doi: 10.1167/11.5.5
116. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766-786. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.766
117. Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980).A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 97-136. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005- 5
118. Underwood, G., Foulsham, T., &Humphrey, K. (2009). Saliency and scan patterns in the inspection of real-world scenes: Eye movements during encoding and recognition. Visual Cognition, 17(6- 812-834. doi: 10.1080/13506280902771278
119. van Zoest, W., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 746-759. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.746
120. Vickery, T. J., King, L. W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 81-92. doi: 10.1167/5.1.8
121. Võ, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. Journal of Vision, 10(3), 14: 11-13. doi: 10.1167/10.3.14
122. Võ, M. L. H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2012). When Does Repeated Search in Scenes Involve Memory? LookingAtVersus Looking For Objects in Scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 23-41. doi: 10.1037/a0024147
123. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2006). The time course of consolidation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1436-1451. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6. 1436
124. von Mühlenen, A., Müller, H. J., & Müller, D. (2003). Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14(4), 309-314. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.14441
125. Wang, Z., & Klein, R. M. (2010). Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: A review. Vision Research, 50(2), 220-228. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.013
126. Weierich, M. R., Treat, T. A., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Theories and measurement of visual attentional processing in anxiety. Cognition & Emotion, 22(6), 985-1018. doi: 10.1080/02699930701597601
127. Williams, C. C., Henderson, J. M., & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(5), 816-827. doi: 10.3758/BF03193535
128. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202-238. doi: 10.3758/bf03200774
129. Wolfe, J. M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 71-94 Cambridge: MIT Press
130. Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G.A., Rosenholtz, R., Kuzmova,Y. I.,&Sherman, A. M. (2011).Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(6), 1650-1671 (2011). doi: 0.3758/s13414-011-0153-3
131. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411-1426. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003. 11.024
132. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(2), 693-716. doi: 10.1037/0096- 1523.26.2.693
133. Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001
134. Woodman, G. F., & Arita, J. T. (2011). Direct electrophysiological measurement of attentional templates in visual working memory. Psychological Science, 22(2), 212-215. doi: 10.1177/0956797610395395
135. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2004).Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 269-274. doi: 10.3758/BF03196569
136. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 363-377. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.363
137. Woodman, G. F., Luck, S. J., & Schall, J. D. (2007). The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 118-124. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm065
138. Yang, H., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets. Vision Research, 49(16), 2095-2103. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.017
139. Zelinsky, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36(14), 2177-2187. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95) 00300-2
140. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008).A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115(4), 787-835. doi: 10.1037/a0013118
141. Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R. P. N., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8(6), 448-453. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00459.x.
142. Zelinsky, G. J., Zhang, W., Yu, B., Chen, X., & Samaras, D. (2006). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in guiding eye movements during visual search. InY.Weiss, B. Scholkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 18, pp. 1569-1576). Cambridge: MIT Press
143. Zhang,W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 24-25 (2009). doi: 10.1038/nn.2223