Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intentionand stimulus-based actions

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue OCT, 2012, Pages

  Herwig, Arvid ^a,b   Waszak, Florian ^c,d  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Action effect; Event file; Feature binding; Ideomotor learning; Sensorimotor integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870929838     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00444     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Barlow, H. B. (1972). Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology. Perception 1, 371-394.
2. Bliss, T. V. P., and Collingridge, G. L. (1993). A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361, 31-39.
3. Brown, G. J., and Wang, D. L. (2006). "Timing is of the essence: neural oscillator models of auditory grouping in speech," in Listening to Speech: An Auditory Perspective, eds S. Greenberg and W. A. Ainsworth (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers), 375-392.
4. Colzato, L. S., Raffone, A., and Hommel, B. (2006). What do we learn from binding features? Evidence for multilevel feature integration. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 705-716.
5. Cowey, A. (1985). "Aspects of cortical organization related to selective attention and selective impairments of visual perception: a tutorial review," in Attention and Performance XI, eds M. I. Posner and O. S. M. Marin (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.), 41-62.
6. Deiber, M. P., Ibanez, V., Sadato, N., and Hallett, M. (1996). Cerebral structures participating in motor preparations in humans: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurophysiol. 75, 233-246.
7. Dutzi, I. B., and Hommel, B. (2009). The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychol. Res. 73, 425-435.
8. Elsner, B., and Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 229-240.
9. Elsner,B.,and Hommel,B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in the acquisition of action effects. Psychol. Res. 68, 138-154.
10. Engel,A. K.,and Singer,W. (2001). Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 5, 16-25.
11. Fell,J.,Fernandez,G.,Klaver,P.,Elger,C. E., and Fries, P. (2003). Is synchronized neuronal gamma activity relevant for selective attention? Brain Res. Rev. 42, 265-272.
12. Felleman, D. J., and van Essen, D. C. V. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 1, 1-47.
13. Gluck, M. A., Meeter, M., and Myers, C. E. (2003). Computational models of the hippocampal region: linking incremental learning and episodic memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 7, 269-276.
14. Gluck, M. A., and Myers, C. E. (1993). Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: a computational theory. Hippocampus 3, 491-516.
15. Godden, D. R., and Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br. J. Psychol. 66, 325-331.
16. Goldberg, G. (1985). Supplementary motor area structure and function: review and hypotheses. Behav. Brain Sci. 8, 567-588.
17. Haggard, P. (2008). Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 934-946.
18. Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens [The Apparatus of Will]. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 38, 50-73.
19. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.
20. Herwig, A., Beisert, M., and Prinz, W. (2013). "Action science emerging: introduction and leitmotifs," in Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline,edsW. Prinz,M. Beisert, and A. Herwig (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
21. Herwig, A., and Horstmann, G. (2011). Action-effect associations revealed by eye movements. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18, 531-537.
22. Herwig, A., Prinz, W., and Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 60, 1540-1554.
23. Herwig, A., and Waszak, F. (2009). Intention and attention in ideomotor learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 219-227.
24. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Vis. Cogn. 5, 183-216.
25. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 8, 494-500.
26. Hommel, B. (2005). How much attention does an event file need? J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 1067-1082.
27. Hommel, B., and Colzato, L. S. (2004). Visual attention and the temporal dynamics of feature integration. Vis. Cogn. 11, 483-521.
28. Hotermans, C., Peigneux, P., Maertens de Noordhout, A., Moonen, G., and Maquet, P. (2006). Early boost and slow consolidation in motor skill learning. Learn. Mem. 13, 580-583.
29. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Dover.
30. Janczyk, M., Heinemann, A., and Pfister, R. (2012). Instant attraction: immediate action-effect bindings occur for both, stimulusand goaldriven actions. Front. Psychol. 3:446. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00446
31. Kahneman, D., Treisman,A., and Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cogn. Psychol. 24, 175-219.
32. Kruschke, J. K., and Blair, N. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7, 636-645.
33. Lhermitte,F. (1983)."Utilization behaviour"and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 106, 237-255.
34. Loftus, G. R., and Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1, 476-490.
35. McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memorya century of consolidation. Science 287, 248-251.
36. Mueller, V, Brass, M., Waszak, F., Prinz, W. (2007). The role of the preSMA and the rostral cingulate zone in internally selected actions. Neuroimage 37, 1354-1361.
37. Nattkemper, D., Ziessler, M., Frensch, P. A. (2010). Binding in voluntary action control. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1092-1101.
38. Passingham, R. (1993). The Frontal Lobes and Voluntary Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Pfister, R., Janczyk, M. (2012). Harleß' apparatus of will: 150 years later. Psychol. Res. 76, 561-565.
40. Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., and Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: actioneffect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychol. Res. 75, 61-65.
41. Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., and Melcher, T. (2010). Adaptive control of ideomotor effect anticipations. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 135, 316-322.
42. Praamstra, P., Stegeman, D. F., Horstink, M. W., Brunia, C. H., and Cools, A. R. (1995). Movement-related potentials preceding voluntary movement are modulated by the mode of movement selection. Exp. Brain Res. 103, 429-439.
43. Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., and Miall,R. C. (2004). Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 576-582.
44. Shallice, T., Burgess, P. W., Schon, F., and Baxton, D. M. (1989). The origins of utilization behavior. Brain 112, 1587-1598.
45. Shin, Y. K., Proctor, R. W., and Capaldi, E. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychol. Bull. 136, 943-974.
46. Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 6, 171-178.
47. von der Malsburg, C. (1999). The what and why of binding: the modeler's perspective. Neuron 24, 95-104.
48. Wagner, A. D. (2001). Synchronicity: when you're gone I'm lost without a trace? Nat. Neurosci. 4, 1159-1160
49. Waszak, F., Cardoso-Leite, P., and Hughes, G. (2012). Action effect anticipation: neurophysiological basis and functional consequences. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36,943-959
50. Waszak, F., Wascher, E., Keller, P., Koch, I., Aschersleben, G., Rosenbaum, D., et al. (2005). Intention-based and stimulus-based mechanisms in action selection. Exp. Brain Res. 162, 346-356.
51. Wickens, J., Hyland, B., and Anson, G. (1994). Cortical cell assemblies: a possible mechanism for motor programs. J. Mot. Behav. 26, 66-82.
52. Wolfensteller, U., and Ruge, H. (2011). On the timescale of stimulus-based action-effect learning. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 64, 1273-1289.
53. Zalutsky, R. A., and Nicoll, R. A. (1990). Comparison of two forms of long-term potentiation in single hippocampal neurons. Science 248, 1619-1624.